The importance of collaboration and supervisor behaviour for gender differences in doctoral student performance and early career development

References

• Abramo, G., C. A. D'Angelo, and A. Caprasecca. 2009. “Gender Differences in Research Productivity: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Academic System.” Scientometrics 79 (3): 517–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajiferuke, I., Q. Burell, and T. Tague. 1988. “Collaborative Coefficient: A Single Measure of the Degree of Collaboration in Research.” Scientometrics 14 (5–6): 421–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D., and J. S. Long. 1990. “Departmental Effects on Scientific Productivity.” American Sociological Review 55 (4): 469–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. 2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate Education as Socialization to the Academic Career.” Journal of Higher Education 73 (2): 94–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. 2009. “Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory and its Implications for Doctoral Education.” International Journal of Academic Development 14 (3): 173–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106494.
   Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., M. East, and J. Bitchener. 2012. “Supervisors’ On-Script Feedback Comments on Drafts of Dissertations: Socialising Students Into the Academic Discourse Community.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (4): 432–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. 2003. “Defining ‘Early Career’ in Research.” Higher Education 45 (3): 257–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. 1994. “The Significance of Disciplinary Differences.” Studies in Higher Education 19 (2): 151–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, C. J., B. A. Center, D. A. Finstad, K. R. Risbey, and J. Staples. 2006. “The Impact of Appointment Type on the Productivity and Commitment of Full-Time Faculty in Research and Doctoral Institutions.” The Journal of Higher Education 77 (1): 89–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. 2004. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (2): 349–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, S. W., and R. T. Blackburn. 1981. “Sponsorship and Academic Career Success.” The Journal of Higher Education 52 (4): 369–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1981.11780155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayol, N., and M. Matt. 2006. “Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists on Productivity.” Information Economics and Policy 18 (1): 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams. 2014. “Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15 (3): 75–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, C. 1996. “Mentoring and Women in Academia: Reevaluating the Traditional Model.” NWSA Journal 8 (3): 79–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.1996.8.3.79.
   Google Scholar
• Clarivate Analytics. 2018. InCites Indicators Handbook. Advance Online Publication. https://incites.help.clarivate.com/Content/Resources/Docs/InCites-Indicators-Handbook%20-%20June%202018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, S., and H. Zuckerman. 1984. “The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication of Men and Women Scientists.” In Advances in Motivation and Achievement, edited by M. W. Steinkamp and M. Maer, 217–58. Greenwich: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costas, R., T. N. van Leeuwen, and M. Bordons. 2010. “A Bibliometric Classificatory Approach for the Study and Assessment of Research Performance at the Individual Level: The Effects of Age on Productivity and Impact.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (8): 1564–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronan-Hillix, T., L. K. Gensheimer, W. A. Cronan-Hillix, and W. S. Davidson. 1986. “Students’ Views of Mentors in Psychology Graduate Training.” Teaching of Psychology 13 (3): 123–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1303_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danell, R., and M. Hjerm. 2013. “Career Prospects for Female University Researchers Have Not Improved.” Scientometrics 94 (3): 999–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., P. Atkinson, and O. Parry. 2000. The Doctoral Experience. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Duch, J., X. H. T. Zeng, M. Sales-Pardo, F. Radicchi, S. Otis, T. K. Woodruff, and L. A. N. Amaral. 2012. “The Possible Role of Resource Requirements and Academic Career-Choice Risk on Gender Differences in Publication Rate and Impact.” PLoS ONE 7 (12): e51332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundar, H., and D. R. Lewis. 1998. “Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education.” Research in Higher Education 39 (6): 607–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, A., and A. Schiffauerova. 2016. “Gender Difference in Research Output, Funding and Collaboration.” International Scholarly and Scientific Research and Innovation 10 (4): 1313–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E., and A. E. Lincoln. 2011. “Scientists Want More Children.” PLoS ONE 6 (8): e22590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. 2006. “Theory and Practise of the G-Index.” Scientometrics 69 (1): 131–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, N., and D. Lachmann. 2018. “Gender Inequity During the Ph.D.: Females in the Life Sciences Benefit Less from Their Integration Into the Scientific Community.” Social Sciences 7 (8): 140. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080140.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, and B. Uzzi. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. “Meta-Analysis of Gender and Science: Synthesis Report.” Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Feldon, D. F., J. Peugh, M. A. Maher, J. Roksa, and C. Tofel-Grehl. 2017. “Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences.” CBE - Life Sciences Education 16 (1): ar4 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenge, L. A. 2012. “Enhancing the Doctoral Journey: The Role of Group Supervision in Supporting Collaborative Learning and Creativity.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 401–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferriman, K., D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow. 2009. “Work Preferences, Life Values, and Personal Views of Top Math/Science Graduate Students and the Profoundly Gifted: Developmental Changes and Gender Differences During Emerging Adulthood and Parenthood.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (3): 517–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 1995. “Women in Scientific Careers.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 205–23. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, T. F., R. H. Jacobsen, J. A. Wallinc, K. Brixena, and J. Ousagerc. 2015. “Gender Differences in Scientific Performance: A Bibliometric Matching Analysis of Danish Health Sciences Graduates.” Journal of Informetrics 9 (4): 1007–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S., J. von Stebut, and J. Allmendinger. 2001. “Gender, Science, and Scientific Organizations in Germany.” Minerva 39 (2): 175–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaule, P., and M. Piacentini. 2018. “An Advisor Like Me? Advisor Gender and Post-Graduate Careers in Science.” Research Policy 47 (4): 805–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginther, D., and S. Kahn. 2006. “Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973–2001.” In Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment, edited by R. B. Freeman and D. L. Goroff, 163–94. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. 2000. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Student Descriptions of the Doctoral Attrition Process.” The Review of Higher Education 23 (2): 199–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M. 2005. “The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition: Lessons Learned from Three Departments.” Journal of Higher Education 76 (6): 669–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, L., and K. B. Ward. 1991. ““Gender and Publishing in Sociology.” Gender and Society 5 (2): 207–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. G. 1991. “Professional Entry and the Adviser Relationship: Socialization, Commitment, and Productivity.” Group and Organization Studies 16 (4): 387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, J., Y. Lin, D. Vogel, and W. Tian. 2011. “What Are the Major Impact Factors on Research Performance of Young Doctorate Holders in Science in China: a USTC Survey.” Higher Education 62 (4): 483–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9400-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HSV. 2011. Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011. Stockholm: Högskoleverket (Swedish National Agency for Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, L. A., and E. Leahey. 2010. “Parenting and Research Productivity: New Evidence and Methods.” Social Studies of Science 40 (3): 433–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, G., and G. Rowley. 2005. “Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: PhD Students’ Progress and Outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (5): 535–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, B. H. 1997. “Style and Quality in Research Supervision: The Supervisor Dependency Factor.” Higher Education 34 (1): 81–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurance, W., C. Useche, S. Laurance, and C. Bradshaw. 2013. “Predicting Publication Success for Biologists.” BioScience 63 (10): 817–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.10.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E. 2006. “Gender Differences in Productivity: Research Specialization as a Missing Link.” Gender and Society 20 (6): 754–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., and D. Boud. 2009. “Framing Doctoral Education as Practice.” In Changing Practices of Doctoral Education, edited by D. Boud and A. Lee, 10–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and B. Bozeman. 2005. “The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 673–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemoine, W. 1992. “Productivity Patterns of Men and Women Scientists in Venezuela.” Scientometrics 24 (2): 281–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, J., Cristian C., and Rickard D. 2019. “Early Career Performance and its Correlation with Gender and Publication Output during Doctoral Education.” Scientometrics 122 (1): 309–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03262-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. 1992. “Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity.” Social Forces 71 (1): 159–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., and C. P. Benbow. 2006. “Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for Math–Science Expertise.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (4): 316–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutter, M., and M. Schröder. 2019. “Is There a Motherhood Penalty in Academia? The Gendered Effect of Children on Academic Publications.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 19 (2), doi:186320808/.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W., D. Scroggins, and P. B. Rule. 1990. “The Mentor in Graduate Education.” Studies in Higher Education 15 (3): 277–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079012331377400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchester, C. F., and D. Barbezat. 2013. “The Effect of Time Use in Explaining Male-Female Productivity Differences Among Economists.” Industrial Relations 52 (1): 53–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., K. J. Rowe, and A. Martin. 2002. “PhD Students’ Evaluations of Research Supervision.” The Journal of Higher Education 73 (3): 313–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and J. Norton. 2006. “Reframing Our Approach to Doctoral Programs: An Integrative Framework for Action and Research.” Higher Education Research and Development 25 (1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, S. J., C. L. Willis, and A. M. Rotchford. 1990. “Gender Differences in Patterns of Publication in Leading Sociology Journals, 1960-1985.” The American Sociologist 21 (2): 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1988. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property.” ISIS 79 (4): 606–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. 2001. “The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (2): 404–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A. 1988. “Women and Mentoring: A Review and Research Agenda.” The Academy of Management Review 13 (1): 65–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paglis, L., L. Green, and S. Bauer. 2006. “Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? A Longitudinal Study of Mentoring and Doctoral Student Outcomes.” Research in Higher Education 47 (4): 451–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, O., W. Glänzel, and R. Danell. 2003. “Inflationary Bibliometric Values: The Role of Scientific Collaboration and the Need for Relative Indicators in Evaluative Studies.” Scientometrics 60 (3): 421–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzoni, M., J. Mairesse, P. Stephan, and J. Lane. 2016. “Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study.” PLoS ONE 11 (1): e0145146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prozesky, H. 2008. “A Career-History Analysis of Gender Differences in Publication Productivity among South African Academics.” Science Studies 21 (2): 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Prpic, K. 2002. “Gender and Productivity Differentials in Science.” Scientometrics 55 (1): 27–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puuska, H. M. 2010. “Effects of Scholar's Gender and Professional Position on Publishing Productivity in Different Publication Types: Analysis of a Finnish University.” Scientometrics 82 (2): 419–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2009. “Developing Scholarly Communities as Learning Environments for Doctoral Students.” International Journal for Academic Development 14 (3): 221–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., J. Vekkaila, and J. Keskinen. 2015. “Fit Matters in the Supervisory Relationship: Doctoral Students and Supervisors’ Perceptions About the Supervisory Activities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 52 (1): 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, L. A., H. Aldrich, and J. Moody. 2000. “Family Matters: Gender, Networks, and Entrepreneurial Outcomes.” Social Forces 79 (2): 523–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reskin, B. F. 1979. “Academic Sponsorship and Scientists’ Careers.” Sociology of Education 52 (3): 129–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2112319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, M. W. 1993. “The Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salton, G. 1989. Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, U., A. Wold, B. Jordansson, B. Ohlsson, and Å Smedberg. 2010. Hans Excellens: Om Miljardsatsningarna på Starka Forskningsmiljöer. Stockholm: Delegationen för jämställdhet i högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., L. S. Hagedorn, M. Arredondo, and F. A. Dicrisi. 2002. “Faculty Research Productivity: Exploring the Role of Gender and Family-Related Factors.” Research in Higher Education 43 (4): 423–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, A., and T. Braun. 1986. “Relative Indicators and Relational Charts for Comparative Assessment of Publication Output and Citation Impact.” Scientometrics 9 (5–6): 281–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., R. Barnacle, and D. Cuthbert. 2014. “How the Doctorate Contributes to the Formation of Active Researchers: What the Research Tells Us.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1972–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stack, S. 2004. “Gender, Children and Research Productivity.” Research in Higher Education 45 (8): 891–920. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-5953-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. W., B. F. Fender, and K. G. Burke. 2006. “Unraveling the Academic Productivity of Economists: The Opportunity Costs of Teaching and Service.” Southern Economic Journal 72 (4): 846–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utbildningsdepartementet. 1994. Jämställdhet Mellan Kvinnor och män Inom Utbildningsområdet. Proposition 1994/95:164. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
   Google Scholar
• van den Besselaar, P., and U. Sandström. 2016. “Gender Differences in Research Performance and Its Impact on Careers: A Longitudinal Case Study.” Scientometrics 106 (1): 143–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. 2018. Reformer inom forskning och forskarutbildning 1990-2017. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Vinkler, P. 1986. “Evaluation of Some Methods for the Relative Assessment of Scientific Publications.” Scientometrics 10 (3–4): 157–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L. 2016. “A Review of the Literature on Citation Impact Indicators.” Journal of Informetrics 10 (2): 365–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidman, J., and C. Stein. 2003. “Socialization of Doctoral Students to Academic Norms.” Research in Higher Education 44 (6): 641–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026123508335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidman, J. C., D. J. Twale, and E. L. Stein. 2001. Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education: A Perilous Passage? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I. O., and D. M. Cable. 2003. “Predicting Early Career Productivity: The Case of Management Faculty.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (1): 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C. A., and S. D. Wright. 1987. “The Role of Mentors in the Career Development of Young Professionals.” Family Relations 36 (2): 204–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/583955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 1998. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence About an Old Puzzle.” American Sociological Review 63 (6): 847–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 2003. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. 1991. “The Careers of Men and Women Scientists: A Review of Current Research.” In The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J. Cole, and J. Bruer, 27–56. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar