1,957
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reconceptualising knowledge exchange and higher education institutions: broadening our understanding of motivations, channels, and stakeholders

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 673-682 | Received 10 Dec 2022, Accepted 06 Feb 2023, Published online: 03 Apr 2023

References

  • Bandora-Gill, J. 2023. “Knowledge Brokering Repertoires: Academic Practices at Science-Policy Interface as an Epistemological Bricolage.” Minerva 61 (1): 71–92. doi:10.1007/s11024-022-09478-5.
  • Bozeman, B., and E. Corley. 2004. “Scientific and Technical Human Capital: Science Careers and Networks as Knowledge Assets.” Research Policy 33 (4): 599–616. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008.
  • Bozeman, B., and M. Gaughan. 2011. “How Do Men and Women Differ in Research Collaborations? An Analysis of the Collaborative Motives and Strategies of Academic Researchers.” Research Policy 40 (10): 1393–402. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002.
  • Chatterjee, D., L. Leisyte, S. Dasappa, and B. Sankaran. 2018. “University Research Commercialization in Emerging Economies: A Glimpse Into the ‘Black Box’.” Science and Public Policy 45 (3): 361–372. doi:10.1093/scipol/scx066.
  • Degl’Innocenti, M., R. Matousek, and N. G. Tzeremes. 2019. “The Interconnections of Academic Research and Universities’ “Third Mission”: Evidence From the UK.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103793. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.002.
  • De Jong, S.P.L., and R. Muhonen. 2020. “Who Benefits from Ex Ante Societal Impact Evaluation in the European Funding Arena? A Cross-Country Comparison of Societal Impact Capacity in the Social Sciences and Humanities.” Research Evaluation 29: 22–33. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy036.
  • De Silva, M. 2016. “Academic Entrepreneurship and Traditional Academic Duties: Synergy or Rivalry?” Studies in Higher Education 41 (12): 2169–2183. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1029901.
  • European Commission. 2007. Improving Knowledge Transfer between Research Institutions and Industry across Europe: Embracing Open Innovation. (COM 2007/182). Brussels: European Commission.
  • Fazey, I., et al. 2014. “Evaluating Knowledge Exchange in Interdisciaplinary and Multi-Stakeholder Research.” Global Environmental Change 25: 2004–2020. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012.
  • Fuller, D., M. Benyon, and D. Pickernell. 2017. “Indexing Third Stream Activities in UK Universities: Exploring the Entrepreneurial/Enterprising University.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (1): 86–110. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1339029.
  • Geuna, A., and A. Muscio. 2009. “The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of Literature.” Minerva 47: 93–114. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2.
  • Giuliani, E., A. Morrison, and C. Pietrobelli. 2010. “Who are the Researchers That are Collaborating with Industry? An Analysis of the Wine Sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy’.” Research Policy 39: 748–61. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007.
  • Goddard, J., and P. Vallance. 2013. The University and the City. London: Routledge.
  • Haeussler, C., and J.A. Colyvas. 2011. “Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany.” Research Policy 40 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.012.
  • Jacobson, N., D. Butterill, and P. Goering. 2004. “Organizational Factors that Influence University-Based Researchers’ Engagement in Knowledge Transfer Activities.” Science Communication 25 (3): 246–259. doi:10.1177/1075547003262038.
  • Jongbloed, B., and A. Zomer. 2012. “Valorisation, Knowledge Transfer and IP: Creating Value from Academic Knowledge.” In Universities in the Knowledge Economy: Higher Education Organisation and Global Change, edited by P. Temple, 82–102. London: Routledge.
  • Kitagawa, F., and C. Lightowler. 2013. “Knowledge Exchange: A Comparison of Policies, Strategies, and Funding Incentives in English and Scottish Higher Education.” Research Evaluation 22 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs035.
  • Laredo, P. 2007. “Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities?” Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 441–456. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169.
  • Leisyte, L., J. Enders, and H. de Boer. 2009. “The Balance Between Teaching and Research in Dutch and English Universities in the Context of University Governance Reforms.” Higher Education 58: 691–35. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9213-1.
  • Llopis, O., M. Sánchez-Barrioluengo, J. Olmos-Peñuela, and E. Castro-Martínez. 2018. “Scientists’ Engagement in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange: Individual Factors, Variety of Mechanisms and Users.” Science and Public Policy 45 (6): 790–803. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy020.
  • Lockett, A., M. Wright, and A. Wild. 2014. “The Institutionalization of Third Stream Activities in UK Higher Education: The Role of Discourse and Metrics.” British Journal of Management 26: 78–92. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12069.
  • Luukkonen, T., and D. A. Thomas. 2016. “The ‘Negotiated Space’ of University Researchers’ Pursuit of a Research Agenda.” Minerva 54 (1): 99–127. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9291-z.
  • Miller, K., J. Cunningham, and E. Lehmann. 2021. “Extending the University Mission and Business Model: Influences and Implications.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (5): 915–925. doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1896799.
  • Molas-Gallart, J., and E. Casto-Martinez. 2007. “Ambiguity and Conflict in the Development of ‘Third Mission’ Indicators.” Research Evaluation 16 (4): 321–330. doi:10.3152/095820207X263592.
  • Molas-Gallart, J., and P. Tang. 2007. Policy and Practice Impacts of ESRC Funded Research: Case Study of the ESRC Centre for Business Research. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
  • Nelles, J., and T. Vorley. 2010. “From Policy to Practice: Engaging and Embedding the Third Mission in Contemporary Universities.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 30 (7-8): 341–353. doi:10.1108/01443331011060706.
  • Olmos-Peñuela, J., P. Benneworth, and E. Castro-Martinez. 2014a. “Are ‘STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus’? Challenging Disciplinary Stereotypes of Research’s Social Value.” Science and Public Policy 41 (3): 384–400. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct071.
  • Olmos-Peñuela, J., E. Castro-Martínez, and P. D´Este. 2014b. “Knowledge Transfer Activities in Social Sciences and Humanities: Explaining the Interactions of Research Groups with non-Academic Agents.” Research Policy 43 (4): 696–706. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004.
  • Perkmann, M., R. Salandra, V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, and A. Hughes. 2021. “Academic Engagement: A Review of the Literature 2011–2019.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104–114. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114.
  • Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D’este, R. Fini, et al. (2013) Academic Engagement and Commercialization: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations. Research Policy 42(2):423-442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
  • Pinheiro, R., P.V. Langa, and A. Pausits. 2015. “The Institutionalization of Universities’ Third Mission: Introduction to the Special Issue.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (3): 227–232. doi:10.1080/21568235.2015.1044551.
  • Rosli, A., and F. Rossi. 2016. “Third-mission Policy Goals and Incentives from Performance-Based Funding: Are They Aligned?” Research Evaluation 25 (4): 427–441. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvw012.
  • Rothaermel, F.T., S.D. Agung, and L. Jiang. 2007. “University Entrepreneurship: A Taxonomy of the Literature.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16 (4): 691–791. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm023.
  • Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. 2014. “Articulating the ‘Three-Missions’ in Spanish Universities.” Research Policy 43 (10): 1760–1773. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.001.
  • Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., and P. Benneworth. 2019. “Is the Entrepreneurial University also Regionally Engaged? Analysing the Influence of University's Structural Configuration on Third Mission Performance.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 141: 206–218. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017.
  • Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., E. Uyarra, and F. Kitagawa. 2019. “Understanding the Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University. The Case of English Higher Education Institutions.” Higher Education Quarterly 73 (4): 469–495. doi:10.1111/hequ.v73.4.
  • Sharifi, H., W. Liu, and H.F. Ismail. 2014. “Higher Education System and the ‘Open’ Knowledge Transfer: A View from Perception of Senior Managers at University Knowledge Transfer Offices.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1860–1884. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.818645.
  • Taxt, R.E., D.K.R. Robinson, A. Schoen, and A. Fløysand. 2022. “The Embedding of Universities in Innovation Ecosystems: The Case of Marine Research at the University of Bergen.” Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography 76 (1): 42–60. doi:10.1080/00291951.2022.2041718.
  • Uyarra, E. 2010. “Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions.” European Planning Studies 18 (8): 1227–1246. doi:10.1080/09654311003791275.
  • Watermeyer, R. 2016. “Public Intellectuals vs. New Public Management: The Defeat of Public Engagement in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (12): 2271–2285. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1034261.