Women scientists in knowledge exchanges with nonacademic actors: participation gap and emerging gender patterns

References

• Abreu, Maria, and Vadim Grinevich. 2013. “The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.” Research Policy 42 (2): 408–22. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abreu, Maria, and Vadim Grinevich. 2017. “Gender Patterns in Academic Entrepreneurship.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (4): 763–94. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9543-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4 (2): 139–58. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Tammy D., Lillian T. Eby, Mark L. Poteet, Elizabeth Lentz, and Lizzette Lima. 2004. “Career Benefits Associated with Mentoring for Protégés: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (1): 127–36. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschhoff, Birgit, and Christoph Grimpe. 2014. “Contemporaneous Peer Effects, Career Age and the Industry Involvement of Academics in Biotechnology.” Research Policy 43 (2): 367–81. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, David B. 2014. “From the Entrepreneurial University to the University for the Entrepreneurial Society.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 39 (3): 313–21. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailyn, Lotte. 2011. “Redesigning Work for Gender Equity and Work–Personal Life Integration.” Community, Work & Family 14 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1080/13668803.2010.532660
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, Rudi, and Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas. 2008. “Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels Between Universities and Industry: To What Degree do Sectors Also Matter?” Research Policy 37 (10): 1837–53. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Laura, Yvonne Benschop, and Marieke van den Brink. 2015. “Practising Gender When Networking: The Case of University–Industry Innovation Projects.” Gender, Work & Organization 22 (6): 556–78. doi:10.1111/gwao.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, Andrea, and Andrea Piccaluga. 1994. “A Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of University-Industry Relationships.” R&D Management 24 (3): 229–47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, Nuria, Sara Fernández-López, and David Rodeiro-Pazos. 2019. “Is University-Industry Collaboration Biased by sex Criteria?” Knowledge Management Research & Practice 17 (4): 408–20. doi:10.1080/14778238.2018.1557024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellari, Lorenzo, and Stephen P. Jenkins. 2003. “Multivariate Probit Regression Using Simulated Maximum Likelihood.” The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata 3 (3): 278–94. doi:10.1177/1536867X0300300305
   Google Scholar
• Carrigan, Coleen, Kate Quinn, and Eve A. Riskin. 2011. “The Gendered Division of Labor among STEM Faculty and the Effects of Critical Mass.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 4 (3): 131–46. doi:10.1037/a0021831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchini, Mathilde, Maria Lehmann Nielsen, and Ea Høg Utoft. 2019. “Gender Dynamics in Academic Networks – a Narrative Review.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning 1-2: 86–98. doi:10.7146/kkf.v28i1-2.116119
   Google Scholar
• Childs, Sarah, and Mona Lena Krook. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Political Representation.” Political Studies 56 (3): 725–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colyvas, Jeannette A, Kaisa Snellman, Janet Bercovitz, and Maryann Feldman. 2012. “Disentangling Effort and Performance: A Renewed Look at Gender Differences in Commercializing Medical School Research.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 37 (4): 478–89. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9235-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, Jessica A., and Jessica R. Goldberger. 2009. “University-Industry Relationships in Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences: The Role of Women Faculty.” Rural Sociology 74 (4): 498–524. doi:10.1526/003601109789864008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, Pablo, Oscar Llopis, Francesco Rentocchini, and Alfredo Yegros. 2019. “The Relationship Between Interdisciplinarity and Distinct Modes of University-Industry Interaction.” Research Policy 48 (9): 103799. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, Pablo, and Pari Patel. 2007. “University–Industry Linkages in the UK: What are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry?” Research Policy 36 (9): 1295–313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, Pablo, Irene Ramos-Vielba, Richard Woolley, and Nabil Amara. 2018. “How Do Researchers Generate Scientific and Societal Impacts? Toward an Analytical and Operational Framework.” Science and Public Policy 45 (6): 752–63. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Waverly, and Emily Choi. 2011. “Divergent Paths to Commercial Science: A Comparison of Scientists’ Founding and Advising Activities.” Research Policy 40 (1): 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, Robin J., and Debra E. Meyerson. 2000. “Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change.” Research in Organizational Behavior 22: 103–51. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, Henry, Carol Kemelgor, Michael Neuschatz, Brian Uzzi, and Joseph Alonzo. 1994. “The Paradox of Critical Mass for Women in Science.” Science 266 (5182): 51–4. doi:10.1126/science.7939644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “She Figures 2018.” Edited by X. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding-Singh, Priya, Devon Magliozzi, and Swethaa Ballakrishnen. 2018. “Why Women Stay Out of the Spotlight.” Harvard Business Review 28.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Joyce K. 2001. Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Massachussetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Mary Frank, Gerhard Sonnert, and Irina Nikiforova. 2009. “Successful Programs for Undergraduate Women in Science and Engineering: Adapting Versus Adopting the Institutional Environment.” Research in Higher Education 50 (4): 333–53. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9120-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasser, Courtney E., and Katharine S. Shaffer. 2014. “Career Development of Women in Academia: Traversing the Leaky Pipeline.” The Professional Counselor 4 (4): 332–52. doi:10.15241/ceg.4.4.332
   Google Scholar
• Gaughan, Monica, and Barry Bozeman. 2016. “Using the Prisms of Gender and Rank to Interpret Research Collaboration Power Dynamics.” Social Studies of Science 46 (4): 536–58. doi:10.1177/0306312716652249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, Rajeev K., Devrim Göktepe-Hultén, and Rati Ram. 2015. “Academics’ Entrepreneurship Propensities and Gender Differences.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (1): 161–77. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9372-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, Madeline E. 2012. “Gender Stereotypes and Workplace Bias.” Research in Organizational Behavior 32: 113–35. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Junming, Alexander J. Gates, Roberta Sinatra, and Albert-László Barabási. 2019. “Historical Comparison of Gender Inequality in Scientific Careers Across Countries and Disciplines.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (9): 4609–16. doi:10.1073/pnas.1914221117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Alan, Cornelia Lawson, Ammon Salter, Michael Kitson, Anna Bullock, and Robert Hughes. 2016. The Changing State of Knowledge Exchange: UK Academic Interactions with External Organizations 2005-2015. London: NCUB.
   Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia, Carroll J. Glynn, and Michael Huge. 2013. “The Matilda Effect in Science Communication: An Experiment on Gender Bias in Publication Quality Perceptions and Collaboration Interest.” Science Communication 35 (5): 603–25. doi:10.1177/1075547012472684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossek, Ellen Ernst, Rong Su, and Lusi Wu. 2017. “‘Opting Out’ or ‘Pushed Out’? Integrating Perspectives on Women’s Career Equality for Gender Inclusion and Interventions.” Journal of Management 43 (1): 228–54. doi:10.1177/0149206316671582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, Réjean, Malek Saïhi, Nabil Amara, and Mathieu Ouimet. 2010. “Evidence on How Academics Manage Their Portfolio of Knowledge Transfer Activities.” Research Policy 39 (10): 1387–403. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Cornelia, Alan Hughes, Ammon Salter, Michael Kitson, Anna Bullock, and Robert B Hughes. 2016. Knowledge Exchange in UK Universities: Results from a Panel of Academics 2005-2015. Centre for Research in Entrepreneurship and Innovation at Bath.
   Google Scholar
• Link, Albert N, Donald S Siegel, and Barry Bozeman. 2007. “An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Informal University Technology Transfer.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16 (4): 641–55. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. Scott, and Mary Frank Fox. 1995. “Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism.” Annual Review of Sociology 21 (1): 45–71. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.21.080195.000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueptow, Lloyd B, Lori Garovich-Szabo, and Margaret B Lueptow. 2001. “Social Change and the Persistence of sex Typing: 1974–1997.” Social Forces 80 (1): 1–36. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, Markus, Rossella Salandra, Valentina Tartari, Maureen McKelvey, and Alan Hughes. 2021. “Academic Engagement: A Review of the Literature 2011-2019.” Research Policy 50 (1). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, Markus, Valentina Tartari, Maureen McKelvey, Erkko Autio, Anders Broström, Pablo D’Este, Riccardo Fini, Aldo Geuna, Rosa Grimaldi, and Alan Hughes. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42 (2): 423–42. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkowska, Dominika. 2013. “Women Scientists in the Leaking Pipeline: Barriers to the Commercialisation of Scientific Knowledge by Women.” Journal of Technology, Management & Innovation 8 (2): 156–65. doi:10.4067/S0718-27242013000200013
   Google Scholar
• Pollitzer, Elizabeth, Carthage Smith, and Claartje Vinkenburg. 2018. “Gender in a Changing Context for STI.” In OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018: Adapting to Technological and Societal Disruption, edited by OECD. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Vielba, Irene, and Manuel Fernández-Esquinas. 2012. “Beneath the tip of the Iceberg: Exploring the Multiple Forms of University–Industry Linkages.” Higher Education 64 (2): 237–65. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9491-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society 18 (4): 510–31. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25 (1): 191–216. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronen, Shelly. 2018. “The Postfeminist Ideology at Work: Endorsing Gender Essentialism and Denying Feminine Devaluation in the Case of Design Work.” Gender, Work & Organization 25 (5): 514–30. doi:10.1111/gwao.12221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, Peter, and Alison Dawson. 2006. “Gender and the Commercialization of University Science: Academic Founders of Spinout Companies.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18 (4): 341–66. doi:10.1080/08985620600680059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savonick, Danica, and Cathy N Davidson. 2017. “Newly Updated for International Women’s Day – Gender Bias in Academe Bibliography.” https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2017/03/08/newly-updated-for-international-womens-day-gender-bias-in-academe-bibliography/.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Helen Lawton, Henry Etzkowitz, Viviana Meschitti, and Alex Poulovassilis. 2017. “Female Academic Entrepreneurship and Commercialisation.” In The Routledge Companion to Global Female Entrepreneurship, edited by Colette Henry, Teresa Nelson, and Kate Lewis, 78–91. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Spaapen, Jack, and Leonie van Drooge. 2011. “Introducing ‘Productive Interactions’ in Social Impact Assessment.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 211–8. doi:10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. 2021. Female Scientists in Figures 2021. Madrid: Women and Science Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, Cassidy R., Chaoqun Ni, Jevin D West, and Vincent Lariviére. 2015. “The Academic Advantage: Gender Disparities in Patenting.” Plos One 10 (5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartari, Valentina, Markus Perkmann, and Ammon Salter. 2014. “In Good Company: The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists.” Research Policy 43 (7): 1189–203. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartari, Valentina, and Ammon Salter. 2015. “The Engagement Gap: Exploring Gender Differences in University–Industry Collaboration Activities.” Research Policy 44 (6): 1176–91. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington, Kjersten Bunker, and Laurel Smith-Doerr. 2005. “Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (4): 355–70. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5
   Google Scholar
• Zippel, Kathrin. 2019. “Gendered Images of International Research Collaboration.” Gender, Work & Organization 26 (12): 1794–805. doi:10.1111/gwao.12233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar