685
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Omics technologies in poultry health and productivity – part 2: future applications in the poultry industry

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 418-423 | Received 27 Apr 2022, Accepted 27 May 2022, Published online: 27 Jun 2022

References

  • Astill, J., Fraser, E., Dara, R. & Sharif, S. (2018). Detecting and predicting emerging disease in poultry with the implementation of new technologies and big data: a focus on avian influenza virus. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 263.
  • Bindari, Y.R. & Gerber, P.F. (2022). Centennial review: factors affecting the chicken gastrointestinal microbial composition and their association with gut health and productive performance. Poultry Science, 101, 101612.
  • Chen, J., Tellez, G., Richards, J.D. & Escobar, J. (2015). Identification of potential biomarkers for gut barrier failure in broiler chickens. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2, 14.
  • D’Adamo, G.L., Widdop, J.T. & Giles, E.M. (2021). The future is now? Clinical and translational aspects of “Omics” technologies. Immunology and Cell Biology, 99, 168–176.
  • Dal Pont, G.C., Belote, B.L., Lee, A., Bortoluzzi, C., Eyng, C., Sevastiyanova, M., Khadem, A., Santin, E., Farnell, Y.Z., Gougoulias, C. & Kogut, M.H. (2021). Novel models for chronic intestinal inflammation in chickens: intestinal inflammation pattern and biomarkers. Frontiers in Immunology, 12, 1–15.
  • De Meyer, F., Eeckhaut, V., Ducatelle, R., Dhaenens, M., Daled, S., Dedeurwaerder, A., De Gussem, M., Haesebrouck, F., Deforce, D. & Van Immerseel, F. (2019). Host intestinal biomarker identification in a gut leakage model in broilers. Veterinary Research, 50, 1–14.
  • Ducatelle, R., Goossens, E., De Meyer, F., Eeckhaut, V., Antonissen, G., Haesebrouck, F. & Van Immerseel, F. (2018). Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry, present status and future perspectives. Veterinary Research, 49, 1–9.
  • Feng, Y., Zhang, Y., Ying, C., Wang, D. & Du, C. (2015). Nanopore-based fourth-generation DNA sequencing technology. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 13, 4–16.
  • Giannuzzi, D., Biolatti, B., Longato, E., Divari, S., Starvaggi Cucuzza, L., Pregel, P., Scaglione, F.E., Rinaldi, A., Chiesa, L.M. & Cannizzo, F.T. (2021). Application of RNA-sequencing to identify biomarkers in broiler chickens prophylactic administered with antimicrobial agents. Animal, 15, 100113.
  • Goossens, E., Debyser, G., Callens, C., De Gussem, M., Dedeurwaerder, A., Devreese, B., Haesebrouck, F., Flügel, M., Pelzer, S., Thiemann, F., Ducatelle, R. & Van Immerseel, F. (2018). Elevated faecal ovotransferrin concentrations are indicative for intestinal barrier failure in broiler chickens. Veterinary Research, 49, 1–8.
  • John, A., Qin, B., Kalari, K.R., Wang, L. & Yu, J. (2020). Patient-specific multi-omics models and the application in personalized combination therapy. Future Oncology, 16, 1737–1750.
  • Kang, M., Ko, E. & Mersha, T.B. (2022). A roadmap for multi-omics data integration using deep learning. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23, 1–8.
  • Kellogg, R.A., Dunn, J. & Snyder, M.P. (2018). Personal omics for precision health. Circulation Research, 122, 1169–1171.
  • Kers, J.G., Velkers, F.C., Fischer, E.A.J., Hermes, G.D.A., Lamot, D.M., Stegeman, J.A. & Smidt, H. (2019). Take care of the environment: housing conditions affect the interplay of nutritional interventions and intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens. Animal Microbiome, 1, 1–14.
  • Kers, J.G., Velkers, F.C., Fischer, E.A.J., Hermes, G.D.A., Stegeman, J.A. & Smidt, H. (2018). Host and environmental factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in chickens. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1–14.
  • Koenig, A., Hoenig, M.E. & Jimenez, D.A. (2016). Effect of sensor location in dogs on performance of an interstitial glucose monitor. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 77, 805–817.
  • Kogut, M.H. (2019). The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 250, 32–40.
  • Kubasova, T., Kollarcikova, M., Crhanova, M., Karasova, D., Cejkova, D., Sebkova, A., Matiasovicova, J., Faldynova, M., Pokorna, A., Cizek, A. & Rychlik, I. (2019). Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks. PLoS One, 14, e0212446.
  • Lee, Y., Bok, J.D., Lee, H.J., Lee, H.G., Kim, D., Lee, I., Kang, S.K. & Choi, Y.J. (2016). Body temperature monitoring using subcutaneously implanted thermo-loggers from Holstein steers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29, 299.
  • Li, N., Ren, Z., Li, D. & Zeng, L. (2020). Review: automated techniques for monitoring the behaviour and welfare of broilers and laying hens: towards the goal of precision livestock farming. Animal, 14, 617–625.
  • Neethirajan, S. (2017). Recent advances in wearable sensors for animal health management. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research, 12, 15–29.
  • Olivier, M., Asmis, R., Hawkins, G.A., Howard, T.D. & Cox, L.A. (2019). The need for multi-omics biomarker signatures in precision medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20, 19.
  • Piening, B.D., Zhou, W., Contrepois, K., Röst, H., Gu Urban, G.J., Mishra, T., Hanson, B.M., Bautista, E.J., Leopold, S., Yeh, C.Y., Spakowicz, D., Banerjee, I., Chen, C., Kukurba, K., Perelman, D., Craig, C., Colbert, E., Salins, D., Rego, S., Lee, S., Zhang, C., Wheeler, J., Sailani, M.R., Liang, L., Abbott, C., Gerstein, M., Mardinoglu, A., Smith, U., Rubin, D.L., Pitteri, S., Sodergren, E., McLaughlin, T.L., Weinstock, G.M., & Snyder, M.P. (2018). Integrative personal omics profiles during periods of weight gain and loss. Cell Systems, 6, 157–170.e8.
  • Reynolds, J., Ahmmed, P. & Bozkurt, A. (2018). Preliminary evaluation of an injectable sensor for subcutaneous photoplethysmography in animals. 2018 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference, BioCAS 2018 - Proceedings.
  • Ringenier, M., Caekebeke, N., De Meyer, F., Van Limbergen, T., Eeckhaut, V., Ducatelle, R., Van Immerseel, F. & Dewulf, J. (2021). A field study on correlations between macroscopic gut health scoring, histological measurements and performance parameters in broilers. Avian Pathology, 50, 500–506.
  • Rios, H.V., Waquil, P.D., de Carvalho, P.S. & Norton, T. (2020). How are information technologies addressing broiler welfare? A systematic review based on the welfare quality® assessment. Sustainability, 12, 1413.
  • Rychlik, I. (2020). Composition and function of chicken gut microbiota. Animals, 10, 103.
  • Sassi, N.B., Averós, X. & Estevez, I. (2016). Technology and poultry welfare. Animals, 6, 62.
  • Schillings, J., Bennett, R. & Rose, D.C. (2021). Exploring the potential of precision livestock farming technologies to help address farm animal welfare. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2, 13.
  • Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose, S.M., Contrepois, K., Moneghetti, K.J., Zhou, W., Mishra, T., Mataraso, S., Dagan-Rosenfeld, O., Ganz, A.B., Dunn, J., Hornburg, D., Rego, S., Perelman, D., Ahadi, S., Sailani, M.R., Zhou, Y., Leopold, S.R., Chen, J., Ashland, M., Christle, J.W., Avina, M., Limcaoco, P., Ruiz, C., Tan, M., Butte, A.J., Weinstock, G.M., Slavich, G.M., Sodergren, E., McLaughlin, T.L., Haddad, F. & Snyder, M.P. (2019). A longitudinal big data approach for precision health. Nature Medicine, 25, 792–804.
  • Stanberry, L., Mias, G., Haynes, W., Higdon, R., Snyder, M. & Kolker, E. (2013). Integrative analysis of longitudinal metabolomics data from a personal multi-omics profile. Metabolites, 3, 741–760.
  • Stanley, D., Geier, M.S., Hughes, R.J., Denman, S.E. & Moore, R.J. (2013). Highly variable microbiota development in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One, 8, 1–7.
  • Stanley, D., Hughes, R.J., Geier, M.S. & Moore, R.J. (2016). Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 187.
  • Theuns, S., Vanmechelen, B., Bernaert, Q., Deboutte, W., Vandenhole, M., Beller, L., Matthijnssens, J., Maes, P. & Nauwynck, H.J. (2018). Nanopore sequencing as a revolutionary diagnostic tool for porcine viral enteric disease complexes identifies porcine kobuvirus as an important enteric virus. Scientific Reports, 8, 1–13.
  • Van Limbergen, T., Sarrazin, S., Chantziaras, I., Dewulf, J., Ducatelle, R., Kyriazakis, I., McMullin, P., Méndez, J., Niemi, J.K., Papasolomontos, S., Szeleszczuk, P., Van Erum, J. & Maes, D. (2020). Risk factors for poor health and performance in European broiler production systems. BMC Veterinary Research, 16, 1–13.
  • Wiedmeyer, C.E. & DeClue, A.E. (2008). Continuous glucose monitoring in dogs and cats. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 22, 2–8.
  • Wu, W.T., Li, Y.J., Feng, A.Z., Li, L., Huang, T., Xu, A.D. & Lyu, J. (2021). Data mining in clinical big data: the frequently used databases, steps, and methodological models. Military Medical Research, 8, 1–12.
  • Zeevi, D., Korem, T., Zmora, N., Israeli, D., Rothschild, D., Weinberger, A., Ben-Yacov, O., Lador, D., Avnit-Sagi, T., Lotan-Pompan, M., Suez, J., Mahdi, J.A., Matot, E., Malka, G., Kosower, N., Rein, M., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Dohnalová, L., Pevsner-Fischer, M., Bikovsky, R., Halpern, Z., Elinav, E. & Segal, E. (2015). Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell, 163, 1079–1094.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.