Understanding interdisciplinarity in its argumentative context: thought and rhetoric in the perception of academic practices

References

• Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., and G. Born, eds. 2013. Interdisciplinarity. Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03085140701760841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1990). Physicists on physics. Studies in Higher Education, 25 (1): 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1996. Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 2009. “Discursive Psychology, Rhetoric and the Issue of Agency.” Semen. Revue de Semio-Linguistique Des Textes et Discours 27: 1–23. http://semen.revues.org/8930.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 2012. “Undisciplined Beginnings, Academic Success, and Discursive Psychology.” British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (3): 413–424. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02086.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton, and A. Radley. 1988. Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brew, A. 2008. “Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Affiliations of Experienced Researchers.” Higher Education 56 (4): 423–438. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9102-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. 2009. “The Lively Process of Interdisciplinarity.” Area 41 (4): 395–403. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00856.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callard, F., and D. Fitzgerald. 2015. Rethinking Interdisciplinarity Across the Social Sciences and Neurosciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. 2001. Shaping Science with Rhetoric. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Centellas, K. M., R. E. Smardon, and S. Fifield. 2014. “Calibrating Translational Cancer Research: Collaboration Without Consensus in Interdisciplinary Laboratory Meetings.” Science, Technology & Human Values 39 (3): 311–335. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913505650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Garcia, C. A. 2015. “‘I Have Never Cared for Particular Disciplines’ – Negotiating an Interdisciplinary Self in Biographical Narrative.” Contemporary Social Science 10 (1): 86–98. http://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2014.974664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFG. 2015. Institutional Website. Accessed August 19, 2015. http://www.dfg.de/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, A. 2015. “How Broad Is Broad.” Accessed July 20, 2015. http://occamstypewriter.org/athenedonald/.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N. 2001. “Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoires, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions.” In Discourse as Data – A Guide for Analysis, edited by M. Wtherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 189–228. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing Horizon 2020: The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020). https://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/pdf/proposals/proposal_for_a_regulation_of_the_european_parliament_and_of_the_council_establishing_horizon_2020_-_the_framework_programme_for_research_and_innovation_(2014-2020).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, P. 2012. “On the Historical Forms of Knowledge Production and Curation: Modernity Entailed Disciplinarity, Postmodernity Entails Antidisciplinarity.” Osiris 27: 56–97. doi: 10.1086/667823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friman, M. 2010. “Understanding Boundary Work Through Discourse Theory: Inter/Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity.” Science Studies 23 (2): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R. 2014. Sustainable Knowledge: A Theory of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. http://doi.org/10.2307/2095325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., and M. Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box. A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S. E. J. 2004. “A Rhetorical Theory of Diffusion.” Academy of Management Review 29 (4): 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, B. 1999. “Interdisciplinarity: For What Purpose?” Policy Sciences 32 (4): 339–343. doi: 10.1023/A:1004718320735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. 2010. “Sociology’s Misfortune: Disciplines, Interdisciplinarity and the Impact of Audit Culture.” The British Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 639–658. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01332.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. A. 2013. In Defense of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2013. “Fields and Fallows: A Political History of STS.” In Interdisciplinarity. Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, edited by A. Barry, and G. Born, 99–118. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Journet, D. 1993. “Interdisciplinary Discourse and “Boundary Rhetoric”: The Case of S. E. Jelliffe.” Written Communication 10 (4): 510–541. doi: 10.1177/0741088393010004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity. History, Theory & Practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 1996. Crossing Boundaries. Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2009. “The Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity. Boundary Work in the Creation of New Knowledge.” In The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, edited by A. A. Lunsford, 265–283. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2010a. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, 15–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2010b. Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures. San Francisco: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W. 2010. “Interdisciplinary Cases and Disciplinary Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and C. Mitcham, 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. 2001. Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., A. Bruce, W. Marsden, and L. Meagher. 2013. “The Role of Funding Agencies in Creating Interdisciplinary Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 40 (1): 62–71. http://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., and I. Fletcher. 2013. “Experiments in Interdisciplinary Capacity-building: The Successes and Challenges of Large-scale Interdisciplinary Investments.” Science and Public Policy 40 (1): 1–7. http://spp.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/scipol/scs113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, M. 2006. “Interdisciplinarity and Political Science.” Politics 26 (2): 73–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAS. 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in the Age of Uncertainty. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, M., S. D. Eigenbrode, and J. D. Wulfhorst. 2014. Enhancing Communication and Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research, edited by M. O’Rourke, S. D. Eigenbrode, and J. D. Wulfhorst. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paglieri, F. 2010. “Discipline Beyond Disciplines.” Nature 464: 1–1. http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj7306-1. doi: 10.1038/nj7290-1
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 2012. “Discourse Analysis and Discursive Psychology.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2, Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, Vol. 2, 119–138. Washington: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P., and G. Bennett. 2012. Designing Human Practices. An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., and M. Wetherell. 2003. “The Discursive Climate of Singleness: The Consequences for Women’s Negotiation of a Single Identity.” Feminism & Psychology 13 (4): 489–510. http://doi.org/10.1177/09593535030134014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, L., and A. Hearn, eds. 1996. Outside the Lines: Issues in Interdisciplinary Research. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, S. 2013. “How Disciplines Look.” In Interdisciplinarity. Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, edited by A. Barry, and G. Born, 57–81. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schoolman, E. D., J. S. Guest, K. F. Bush, and A. R. Bell. 2012. “How Interdisciplinary is Sustainability Research? Analyzing the Structure of an Emerging Scientific Field.” Sustainability Science 7 (1): 67–80. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0139-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strober, M. H. 2011. Interdisciplinary Conversations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and K. Littleton. 2006. Biographies in talk: a narrativediscursive research approach. Qualitative Sociology Review 2 (1): 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 2000. “Interdisciplinarity: The Paradoxical Discourse.” In Practising Interdisciplinarity, edited by P. Weingart, and N. Stehr, 25–41. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 2010. “A Short History of Knowledge Formations. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, C. Mitcham, and J. B. Holbrook, 3–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar