Unsavory medicine for technological civilization: Introducing ‘Artificial Intelligence & its Discontents’

References

• Adali, Sibel. 2013. Modeling Trust Context in Networks. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, Alison. 1998. Artificial Knowing: Gender and the Thinking Machine. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Agre, Philip. 1997. Computation and Human Experience. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Stuart, Kaj Sotala, and Seán S. Ó hÉigeartaigh. 2014. “The Errors, Insights and Lessons of Famous AI Predictions – and What They Mean for the Future.” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 26 (3): 317–342. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2014.895105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasoski, Neda, and Kalindi Vora. 2019. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Perverse Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, William Sims, Edward E. Brent, Kathleen M. Carley, David R. Heise, Michael W. Macy, Barry Markovsky, and John Skvoretz. 1994. “Artificial Social Intelligence.” Annual Review of Sociology 20 (1): 407–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.002203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrat, James. 2013. Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bellman, Richard. 1958. “On ‘Heuristic Problem Solving’ by Simon and Newell.” Operations Research 6 (3): 448–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. 1st ed. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Beusmans, Jack, and Karen Wieckert. 1989. “Computing, Research, and War: If Knowledge Is Power, Where Is Responsibility?” Communications of the ACM 32 (8): 939–951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/65971.65973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Brian P. 1987. The Question of Artificial Intelligence: Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives. New York, NY: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, Margaret A., ed. 1996. Artificial Intelligence. 1st ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Born, Rainer P., ed. 1987. Artificial Intelligence: The Case Against. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brödner, Peter. 1990. The Shape of Future Technology: The Anthropocentric Alternative. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London: Springer London. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1733-9.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Rodney Allen. 1999. Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broussard, Meredith. 2018. Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2012. Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution Is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2016. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in the Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York; London: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Tom Mitchell. 2017. “What Can Machine Learning Do? Workforce Implications.” Science 358 (6370): 1530–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2020. “2020 Doomsday Clock Statement.” Edited by John Mecklin. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, January, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1963. “Implications of Automation and Other Technological Developments: A Selected Annotated Bibliography.” 1319–1. US Department of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Samuel. 1872. Erewhon. London: Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Cabitza, Federico, Raffaele Rasoini, and Gian Franco Gensini. 2017. “Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning in Medicine.” JAMA 318 (6): 517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, John Law, and Arie Rip, eds. 1986. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cava, Marco Della. 2018. “Elon Musk Says AI Could Doom Human Civilization. Zuckerberg Disagrees. Who’s Right?” USA TODAY, January 2, 2018. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2018/01/02/artificial-intelligence-end-world-overblown-fears/985813001/.
   Google Scholar
• Char, Danton S., Nigam H. Shah, and David Magnus. 2018. “Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care – Addressing Ethical Challenges.” New England Journal of Medicine 378 (11): 981–983. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1714229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, Danielle Keats, and Frank A. Pasquale. 2014. “The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions.” Washington Law Review 89 (1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Stuart. 2014. “Artificial Intelligence Could Spell End of Human Race – Stephen Hawking.” The Guardian, December 2, sec. Science. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/dec/02/stephen-hawking-intel-communication-system-astrophysicist-software-predictive-text-type.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, John. 1966. Human Robots in Myth and Science. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Coiera, Enrico W. 1996. “Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: The Challenges Ahead.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 3 (6): 363–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1996.97084510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M. 1989. “Computers and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 19 (4): 613–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M. 1990. Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligence Machines. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M. 1992. “Hubert L. Dreyfus, Forms of Life, and a Simple Test for Machine Intelligence.” Social Studies of Science 22 (4): 726–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M. 2018. Artifictional Intelligence: Against Humanity’s Surrender to Computers. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M., and Martin Kusch. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Randall. 1992. “Can Sociology Create an Artificial Intelligence?” In Sociological Insight: An Introduction to Non-Obvious Sociology, 155–188. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comiter, Marcus. 2019. Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. Martin, Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen, and Felix Rauner. 1991. Crossing the Border: The Social and Engineering Design of Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London; New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Crevier, Daniel. 1993. AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, Michael, Thomas Ray, William A Dembski, John R Searle, George Gilder, and Ray Kurzweil. 2002. Are We Spiritual Machines?: Ray Kurzweil vs the Critics of Strong A.I. Edited by Jay W. Richards. 1st ed. Seattle, WA: Discovery Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diamandis, Peter H., and Steven Kotler. 2012. Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think. 1st Free Press hardcover ed. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Stuart. 1962. “Artificial Intelligence: Deus Ex Machina.” The Second Coming, June.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1965. Alchemy and Artificial Intelligence. P-3244. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1972. What Computers Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do. New York, NY: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2007. “Why Heideggerian AI Failed and How Fixing It Would Require Making It More Heideggerian.” Philosophical Psychology 20 (2): 247–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080701239510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart E. Dreyfus. 1986. “Competent Systems: The Only Future for Inference-Making Computers.” Future Generation Computer Systems 2 (4): 233–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-739X(86)90023-3.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L., and Stuart E. Dreyfus. 1988. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Stuart E. 2004. “Totally Model-Free Learned Skillful Coping.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24 (3): 182–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264813.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Stuart E. 2009. “A Modern Perspective on Creative Cognition.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 29 (1): 3–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467608328708.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Stuart E. 2014. “System 0: The Overlooked Explanation of Expert Intuition.” In Handbook of Research Methods on Intuition, edited by Marta Sinclair, 15–27. Handbooks of Research Methods in Management. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, Tim, Brent Barron, and Gaga Boskovic. 2018. Building an AI World: Report on National and Regional AI Strategies. Toronto, ON: CIFAR. https://www.cifar.ca/docs/default-source/ai-society/buildinganaiworld_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Paul N. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, Jacques. 1964. The Technological Society. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ennals, Richard. 1991. Artificial Intelligence and Human Institutions. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London; New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, Virginia. 2017. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. 1st ed. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, and Joint Research Centre. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence: A European Perspective.” http://publications.europa.eu/publication/manifestation_identifier/PUB_KJNA29425ENE.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciano, Josh Cowls, Monica Beltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Christoph Luetge, et al. 2018. “AI4People—an Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28 (4): 689–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foer, Franklin. 2018. World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, Diana E. 2001. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Martin. 2009. The Lights in the Tunnel: Automation, Accelerating Technology and the Economy of the Future. Acculant Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Martin. 2015. Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, E. M. 1909. “The Machine Stops.” The Oxford and Cambridge Review, November.
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, Diana E. 1993. “The Construction of Work in Artificial Intelligence.” Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (4): 460–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. 1961. Civilization and Its Discontents. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, Carl Benedikt. 2019. The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Simson, and Rachel H Grunspan. 2018. The Computer Book: From the Abacus to Artificial Intelligence, 250 Milestones in the History of Computer Science. https://www.overdrive.com/search?q=62FCFE29-6B04-40AC-BFA4-3FFCD565784B.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2018a. “AI Risk Mitigation Through Democratic Governance: Introducing the 7-Dimensional AI Risk Horizon.” In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 366–367. AIES ‘18. New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278801.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2018b. “Interview with Colin Garvey, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Artificial Intelligence and Systems Medicine Convergence.” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 22 (2): 130–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2017.0218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2018c. “Broken Promises and Empty Threats: The Evolution of AI in the USA, 1956-1996.” Technology’s Stories, March. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15763/jou.ts.2018.03.16.18.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2018d. “ A Framework for Evaluating Barriers to the Democratization of Artificial Intelligence.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, Louisiana USA - February 2-7, 2018, 8079-8080. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press. https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI18/paper/view/17320/16477.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2019a. “Hypothesis: Is ‘Terminator Syndrome’ a Barrier to Democratizing Artificial Intelligence and Public Engagement in Digital Health?” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 23 (7): 362–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2019.0070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2019b. “Artificial Intelligence and Japan’s Fifth Generation: The Information Society, Neoliberalism, and Alternative Modernities.” Pacific Historical Review 88 (4): 619–658. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2019.88.4.619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin, and Chandler Maskal. 2019. “Sentiment Analysis of the News Media on Artificial Intelligence Does Not Support Claims of Negative Bias Against Artificial Intelligence.” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 23: 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2019.0078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraci, Robert M. 2010. Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven in Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gimpel, Jean. 1977. The Medieval Machine: The Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, Evelyn Nakano, and Roslyn L. Feldberg. 1977. “Degraded and Deskilled: The Proletarianization of Clerical Work.” Social Problems 25 (1): 52–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/800467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göranzon, Bo, ed. 1995. Skill, Technology, and Enlightenment: On Practical Philosophy. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London; New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Göranzon, Bo, and Magnus Florin, eds. 1990. Artifical Intelligence, Culture and Language: On Education and Work. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London: Springer London. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1729-2.
   Google Scholar
• Göranzon, Bo, and Magnus Florin, eds. 1991. Dialogue and Technology: Art and Knowledge. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London; New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberger, Martin. 1962. Computers and the World of the Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendler, James, and Alice M. Mulvehill. 2016. Social Machines: The Coming Collision of Artificial Intelligence, Social Networking, and Humanity. Berkeley, CA: Apress.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks-Jansen, Horst. 1996. Catching Ourselves in the Act: Situated Activity, Interactive Emergence, Evolution, and Human Thought. Complex Adaptive Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herper, Matthew. 2017. “MD Anderson Benches IBM Watson in Setback For Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.” Forbes, February 19. https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2017/02/19/md-anderson-benches-ibm-watson-in-setback-for-artificial-intelligence-in-medicine/.
   Google Scholar
• Herzfeld, Noreen L. 2002. In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, Alice Mary. 1964. “Cyberculture – The Age of Abundance and Leisure.” Michigan Quarterly Review 3 (4). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.act2080.0003.004:03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoos, Ida R. 1960a. “The Impact of Office Automation on Workers.” International Labour Review 82 (4): 363–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoos, Ida R. 1960b. “The Sociological Impact of Automation in the Office.” Management Science MT-1 (2): 10–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mantech.1.2.10.
   Google Scholar
• Hoos, Ida R. 1978. “Paperwork Control.” Society 16 (1): 5–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02712550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, E. 1968. “Computer Simulation: Artificial Intelligence Studies and Their Relevance to Psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology 19 (1): 135–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.19.020168.001031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaidka, Kokil, Salvatore Giorgi, H. Andrew Schwartz, Margaret L. Kern, Lyle H. Ungar, and Johannes C. Eichstaedt. 2020. “Estimating Geographic Subjective Well-Being from Twitter: A Comparison of Dictionary and Data-Driven Language Methods.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (19): 10165–10171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906364117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaki, Stanley L. 1969. Brains, Minds, and Computers. New York, NY: Herder and Herder, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 1996. “Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science.” Social Studies of Science 26 (2): 393–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Clive, and Barrie Sherman. 1979. The Collapse of Work. London: Eyre Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Johannessen, Jon-Arild. 2019. The Workplace of the Future: The Fourth Industrial Revolution, the Precariat and the Death of Hierarchies. Routledge Studies in the Economics of Innovation. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, James S. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence: A Threat to Strategic Stability.” Strategic Studies Quarterly 24: 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, Ronald. 2011. “Cybernetics, Automata Studies, and the Dartmouth Conference on Artificial Intelligence.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 33 (4): 5–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2010.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, Rob. 1996. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices. San Diego, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama, Akihito. 2016. Jinkō chinō wa watashitachi wo horobosunoka: keisanki ga kami ni naru 100 nen no monogatari [Will AI Destroy us all? The 100 Year Story of Calculators Becoming Gods]. Tokyo: Diamond Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Krittanawong, C. 2018. “The Rise of Artificial Intelligence and the Uncertain Future for Physicians.” European Journal of Internal Medicine 48 (February): e13–e14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2017.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Kai-Fu. 2018. AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Leontief, Wassily, and Faye Duchin. 1986. The Future Impact of Automation on Workers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lighthill, James. 1973. Lighthill Report: Artificial Intelligence. London: Science Research Council (SRC).
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Herbert. 2019. “The Existential Threat from Cyber-Enabled Information Warfare.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75 (4): 187–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1629574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, Alan. n.d. Getting to the Future First: How Britain Can Lead the Fourth Industrial Revolution. London: ConservativeHome: the home of conservativism.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, Gary, and Ernest Davis. 2019. Rebooting AI: Building Artificial Intelligence We Can Trust. 1st ed. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. Dianne. 1993. “The Myth of the Awesome Thinking Machine.” Communications of the ACM 36 (4): 120–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/255950.153587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maturana, Humberto R., and Francisco J. Varela. 1992. The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Rev. ed. Boston, MA; New York, NY: Shambhala; Distributed in the U.S. by Random House.
   Google Scholar
• McAfee, Andrew, and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2017. Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• McCorduck, Pamela. 1979. Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry Into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• McCorduck, Pamela. 2004. Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry Into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence. 25th anniversary update. Natick, MA: A.K. Peters.
   Google Scholar
• McCorduck, Pamela. 2019. This Could Be Important: My Life and Times with the Artificial Intelligentsia. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University: ETC Press: Signature.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, Drew. 1976. “Artificial Intelligence Meets Natural Stupidity.” ACM SIGART Bulletin 57 (April): 4–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1045339.1045340.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, Scott Mayer, Marcin Sieniek, Varun Godbole, Jonathan Godwin, Natasha Antropova, Hutan Ashrafian, Trevor Back, et al. 2020. “International Evaluation of an AI System for Breast Cancer Screening.” Nature 577 (7788): 89–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecklin, John. 2019. “Dealing Realistically with the Artificial Intelligence Revolution.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 75 (3): 93–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2019.1604812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, Donald N. 1962. Cybernation: The Silent Conquest. Santa Barbara, CA: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, Masahiro. 1981. The Buddha in the Robot. 1st. English ed. Tokyo: Kosei Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Motzkin, Elhanan, and John R. Searle. 1989. “Artificial Intelligence and the Chinese Room: An Exchange.” The New York Review of Books, February 16. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1989/02/16/artificial-intelligence-and-the-chinese-room-an-ex/.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Vincent C.2016. Risks of Artificial Intelligence. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1963. Technics and Civilization. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1964. “Authoritarian and Democratic Technics.” Technology and Culture 5 (1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1965. “Utopia, The City and The Machine.” In Utopias and Utopian Thought, edited by Frank E. Manuel, 3–24. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1967. Technics and Human Development. Vol. 1. 2 vols. The Myth of the Machine. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1970. The Pentagon of Power. Vol. 2. 2 vols. The Myth of the Machine. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Negrotti, Massimo, ed. 1991. Understanding the Artificial: On the Future Shape of Artificial Intelligence. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London and New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, Ulric. 1963. “The Imitation of Man by Machine.” Science 139 (3551): 193–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newquist, H. P. 1994. The Brain Makers. 1st ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sams Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, Nils J. 2010. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, David F. 1978. “Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools, and a Challenge for Labor.” Politics & Society 8 (3–4): 313–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, David F. 1999. The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nourbakhsh, Illah Reza, and Jennifer Keating. 2020. AI & Humanity. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSCAI. 2019. Interim Report. Washington, DC: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Olazaran, Mikel. 1996. “A Sociological Study of the Official History of the Perceptrons Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 26 (3): 611–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. London: Allen Lane, Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein, Severo M., Brian C. Smith, and Lucy A. Suchman. 1984. “Strategic Computing.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 40 (10): 11–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1984.11459292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ornstein, Severo M., Brian C. Smith, and Lucy A. Suchman. 1985. “Strategic Computing: An Assessment.” Communications of the ACM 28 (2): 134–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2786.314986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, Vural, and Simon Springer. 2018. “What Does ‘Diversity’ Mean for Public Engagement in Science? A New Metric for Innovation Ecosystem Diversity.” OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 22 (3): 184–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquinelli, Matteo, ed. 2015. Alleys of Your Mind: Augmented Intelligence and Its Traumas. Lüneburg: Meson press.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, Roger. 1989. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrault, Raymond, Yoav Shoham, Erik Brynjolfsson, Jack Clark, John Etchemendy, Barbara Grosz, Terah Lyons, James Manyika, and Juan Carlos Niebles. 2019. AI Index 2019. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, John R., John B. Carroll, Eric P. Hamp, David G. Hays, Charles F. Hockett, Anthony G. Oettinger, and Alan Perlis. 1966. Language and Machines: Computers in Translation and Linguistics. 1416. Washington, DC: Automatic Language Processing Advisory Committee, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, Abishur. 2019. “The Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence.” Scientific American Blog Network (blog). July 11. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-geopolitics-of-artificial-intelligence/.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbrock, H. H., ed. 1989. Designing Human-Centred Technology: A Cross-Disciplinary Project in Computer-Aided Manufacturing. The Springer Series on Artificial Intelligence and Society. London ; New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Casey. 2018. “IBM’s Watson Recommended ‘Unsafe and Incorrect’ Cancer Treatments.” STAT. July 25. https://www.statnews.com/2018/07/25/ibm-watson-recommended-unsafe-incorrect-treatments/.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Gene, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (2): 251–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Stuart J. 2019. Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Stuart J., and Peter Norvig. 2010. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scharre, Paul. 2018. Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War. 1st ed. New York ; London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Eric, Robert O. Work, Safra Catz, Steve Chien, Mignon Clyburn, Christopher Darby, Kenneth Ford, et al. 2020. NSCAI First Quarter Recommendations. Washington, DC: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, Klaus. 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York, NY: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1980. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1999. “I Married a Computer.” The New York Review of Books, April 8. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1999/04/08/i-married-a-computer/.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 2014. “What Your Computer Can’t Know.” New York Review of Books, October.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R., and Ray Kurzweil. 1999. “‘I Married a Computer’: An Exchange.” The New York Review of Books, May 20. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/1999/05/20/i-married-a-computer-an-exchange/.
   Google Scholar
• Shoham, Yoav, Raymond Perrault, Erik Brynjolfsson, and Jack Clark. 2017. AI Index 2017. Stanford, CA: One Hundred Year Study on AI at Stanford University. http://aiindex.org/2017/.
   Google Scholar
• Shoham, Yoav, Raymond Perrault, Erik Brynjolfsson, Jack Clark, James Manyika, Juan Carlos Niebles, Terah Lyons, John Etchemendy, Barbara Grosz, and Zoe Bauer. 2018. The AI Index 2018 Annual Report. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Silberman, Charles. 1966. The Myths of Automation. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Elizabeth S. 1993. “On the Shoulders of Giants: From Boole to Shannon to Taube: The Origins and Development of Computerized Information from the Mid-19th Century to the Present.” Information Technology and Libraries 12 (2): 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Brian Cantwell. 2019. The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solo, Robert A. 1963. “Automation: Technique, Mystique, Critique.” The Journal of Business 36 (2): 166–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513518154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, E. 2019. “IBM Watson, Heal Thyself: How IBM Overpromised and Underdelivered on AI Health Care.” IEEE Spectrum 56 (4): 24–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2019.8678513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy A. 2007. “Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 3rd ed., 139–163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press : Published in cooperation with the Society for the Social Studies of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, Jamie. 2018. Future Politics: Living Together in a World Transformed by Tech. 1st ed. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taplin, Jonathan T. 2018. Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Taube, Mortimer. 1961. Computers and Common Sense: The Myth of Thinking Machines. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tegmark, Max. 2017. Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. 1st ed. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Terborgh, George. 1965. The Automation Hysteria. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Topol, Eric J. 2019. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. 1st ed. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• United States Congress Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare. 1963. Nation’s Manpower Revolution: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Employment and Manpower of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, United States Senate, Eighty-Eighth Congress, First Session, Relating to the Training and Utilization of the Manpower Sources of the Nation … U.S. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2018. Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects US and Undermines Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter-Boettcher, Sara. 2017. Technically Wrong: Sexist Apps, Biased Algorithms, and Other Threats of Toxic Tech. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Amy. 2019. The Big Nine: How the Tech Titans and Their Thinking Machines Could Warp Humanity. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Graham, Rogier Creemers, Paul Triolo, and Elsa Kania. 2017. “Full Translation: China’s ‘New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan’ (2017).” New America. https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/full-translation-chinas-new-generation-artificial-intelligence-development-plan-2017/.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Alvin M. 1962. “Review: Computers and Common Sense: The Myth of Thinking Machines by Mortimer Taube.” The Library Quarterly 32 (4): 309–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizenbaum, Joseph. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Harvey. 1972. “Artificial Reasoning Machines and Politics.” In Computers and the Problems of Society, edited by Harold Sackman, and Harold Borko, 467–493. Montvale, NJ: AFIPS Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, Lynn. 1980. Medieval Technology and Social Change. Reprinted. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence for the American People.” The White House (blog). May 10. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/artificial-intelligence-american-people/.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Norbert. 1960. “Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation.” Science 131 (3410): 1355–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, Norbert. 1964. God and Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, Norbert. 1989. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. London: Free Association.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. 1989. Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Seventh Printing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. 2016. The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Global Challenge Insight Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Community Genetics 9 (3): 211–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000092659.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamagishi, Toshio. 2011. Trust. The Science of the Mind. Tokyo: Springer Tokyo. http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53936-0.
   Google Scholar
• Yampolskiy, Roman V. 2015. Artificial Superintelligence: A Futuristic Approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, Shoshana. 2018. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. 1st ed. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar