Can I believe what I see? Data visualization and trust in the humanities

References

• Ada Lovelace Institute. 2020. Examining the Black Box: Tools for Assessing Algorithmic Systems. London: Ada Lovelace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Agostinho, Daniela, Katrine Dirckinck-Holmfeld, and Karen Louise Grova Søilen. 2019. “Archives That Matter: Infrastructures for Sharing Unshared Histories.” Special Issue of Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab og Kulturformidling 8 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ayesha, Shaeela, Muhammad Kashif Hanif, and Ramzan Talib. 2020. “Overview and Comparative Study of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for High Dimensional Data.” Information Fusion 59: 44–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babuta, Alexander, and Marion Oswald. 2020. Data Analytics and Algorithms in Policing in England and Wales: Towards A New Policy Framework. London: Royal United Services Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Barredo Arrieta, Alejandro, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, Javier Del Ser, Adrien Bennetot, Siham Tabik, Alberto Barbado, Salvador Garcia, et al. 2020. “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges Toward Responsible AI.” Information Fusion 58: 82–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Mark, and Sonia Ranade. 2015. “Traces Through Time: A Case-Study of Applying Statistical Methods to Refine Algorithms for Linking Biographical Data.” In Proceedings of Biographical Data in a Digital World 2015 (BD 2015), edited by S. ter Braake, A. Fokkens, R. Sluijter, T. Declerck, and E. Wandl Vogt, 24–32. Amsterdam, 9 April.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, Sanford. 1971. Prejudices and Antipathies: Tract on the LC Subject Heads Concerning People. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
   Google Scholar
• Bolukbasi, Tolga, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y. Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T. Kalai. 2016. “Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 5-10 December 2016, edited by D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, U. V. Luxburg, I. Guyon, and R. Garnett, 29, 4349–4357. Curran Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bouk, Dan. 2020. “Error, Uncertainty, and the Shifting Ground of Census Data.” Harvard Data Science Review, doi https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.962cb309. (Accessed 8 July 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, Adrian W. 2019. “Graphics for Uncertainty.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 182 (Part 2): 403–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd Davis, Stephen, and Florian Kräutli. 2015. “The Idea and Image of Historical Time: Interactions Between Design and Digital Humanities.” Visible Language 49 (3):Special issue ‘Critical Making: Design and the Digital Humanities’ 100–119.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd Davis, Stephen, and Olivia Vane. 2020. “Design as Externalization: Enabling Research.” Information Design Journal 25 (1): 28–42.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd Davis, Stephen, Olivia Vane, and Florian Kräutli. 2016. “Using Data Visualisation to Tell Stories About Collections.” In Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, 221–228. London. 12–14 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Briant, Emma L. 2018. “Explanatory Essays Giving Context and Analysis to Submitted Evidence.” In Research on Leave.EU and Cambridge Analytica. UK Parliament. Accessed 13 June 2020. https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/digital-culture-media-and-sport-committee/news/fake-news-briant-evidence-17-19/.
   Google Scholar
• British Library. 2019. ‘British and Irish Newspapers’ by British Library Contemporary British and British Library Collections Metadata. Accessed 09/03/2020. https://bl.iro.bl.uk/work/7da47fac-a759-49e2-a95a-26d49004eba8.
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, Joy, and Timnit Gebru. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 81: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Lucie C. 2016. “Provenance in Digital Libraries: Source, Context, Value and Trust.” In Building Trust in Information, edited by Victoria L. Lemieux, 81–91. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cairo, Alberto. 2019. How Charts Lie: Getting Smarter About Visual Information. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, Aylin, Joanna J. Bryson, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017. “Semantics Derived Automatically from Language Corpora Contain Human-Like Biases.” Science 356 (6334): 183–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, Alissa, and Keshav Mukunda. 2015. “A Case Study in Indigenous Classification: Revisiting and Reviving the Brian Deer Scheme.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 53: 548–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilcott, Alicia. 2019. “Towards Protocols for Describing Racially Offensive Language in UK Public Archives.” Archival Science 19 (4): 359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, Jeffrey. 1987. A Survey of Hypertext. Austin, TX: Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, Sam. 2017. “Understanding Textual Uncertainty in Dates Using Interactive Timelines.” In Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2017), edited by Jonathan P. Bowen, Nick Lambert, and Graham Diprose, 68–73. London: British Computer Society, 11–13 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate, and Trevor Paglen. 2019. Excavating AI: The Politics of Training Sets for Machine Learning. Accessed 15 June 2020. https://excavating.ai.
   Google Scholar
• Criado-Perez, Caroline. 2019. Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. London: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Crymble, Adam. 2016. “Digital Library Search Preferences Amongst Historians and Genealogists: British History Online User Survey.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 10 (4). Accessed 21 January 2021. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/4/000270/000270.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, Jennifer L. 2018. “Challenging the “Love of Possessions”: Repatriation of Sacred Objects in the United States and Canada.” Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals 14 (1): 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, Catherine. 2017. “Creative Data Literacy: Bridging the Gap Between the Data-Haves and Data-Have Nots.” Information Design Journal 23 (1): 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2016. “Feminist Data Visualization.” Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH). Baltimore, MD: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörk, Marian, Patrick Feng, Christopher Collins, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2013. “Critical InfoVis: Exploring the Politics of Visualization.” In CHI 13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 13). Association for Computing Machinery. 2189–2198.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, Joanna. 2011. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 5(1) Accessed 27 July 2020. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, Marisa Elena, and Miranda Belarde-Lewis. 2015. “Imagining: Creating Spaces for Indigenous Ontologies.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 53 (5–6): 677–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmond, Jennifer. 2019. “Strategies and Recommendations for the Management of Uncertainty in Research Tools and Environments for Digital History.” Informatics 6 (3): 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Lilian, and Michael Veale. 2017. “Slave to the Algorithm? Why a “Right to an Explanation” is Probably Not the Remedy You are Looking For.” Duke Law & Technology Review 16 (1): 18–84.
   Google Scholar
• Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers, etc. [1766] 2017. Edited by Denis Diderot and Jean le Rond d’Alembert. University of Chicago: ARTFL Encyclopédie Project (Autumn 2017 Edition), Accessed 21 June 2020. http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Favaretto, Maddalena, Eva De Clercq, and Bernice Simone Elger. 2019. “Big Data and Discrimination: Perils, Promises and Solutions: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Big Data 6 (1): 12.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, Max, Ralph Barczok, Steffen Koch, and Dorothea Weltecke. 2019. “Confidence as First-class Attribute in Digital Humanities Data.” 4th IEEE Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH) 2019, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, Paul. 2016. “An Archaeology of Victorian Newspapers.” Victorian Periodicals Review 49 (4): 546–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazi, Andromache. 2014. “Exhibition Ethics - An Overview of Major Issues.” Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies 12 (1): 1–10. Article 4.
   Google Scholar
• Giblin, John, Imma Ramos, and Nikki Grout. 2019. “Dismantling the Master’s House.” Third Text 33 (4-5): 471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givens, Alexandra Reeve. 2020. “Algorithmic Bias Hurts People with Disabilities, Too.” Slate. Accessed 16 June 2020. https://slate.com/technology/2020/02/algorithmic-bias-people-with-disabilities.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Bryce W. 2016. “A Step Towards Accountable Algorithms? Algorithmic Discrimination and the European Union General Data Protection.” In 29th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016). Barcelona. [n.p.]
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Gabrielle, and Matthew Hayler. 2018. “Collaboration in Digital Humanities Research – Persisting Silences.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 12 (1): n.p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Jessica Milstead, and Doris Clack. 1979. “Treatment of People and Peoples in Subject Analysis.” Library Resources and Technical Services 23 (4): 374–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauswedell, Tessa, Julianne Nyhan, M. H. Beals, Melissa Terras, and Emily Bell. 2020. “Of Global Reach yet of Situated Contexts: an Examination of the Implicit and Explicit Selection Criteria That Shape Digital Archives of Historical Newspapers.” Archival Science 20 (2): 139–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe, Geoff, and Mitchell Whitelaw. 2015. “Colouring Digital Collections: Challenges and Opportunities for the Use of Colour Metadata in Cultural Collections.” Museums and the Web Asia 2015 (MWA2015). Accessed 30 December 2020. https://mwa2015.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/colouring-digital-collections-challenges-and-opportunities-for-the-use-of-colour-metadata-in-cultural-collections/.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper Greenhill, Eilean. 1992. Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huxtable, Sally-Anne, Corinne Fowler, Christo Kefalas, and Emma Slocombe. 2020. Interim Report on the Connections Between Colonialism and Properties now in the Care of the National Trust, Including Links with Historic Slavery. Swindon: National Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Junginger, Pauline, Dennis Ostendorf, Barbara Avila Vissirini, Anastasia Voloshina, Timo Hausmann, Sarah Kreiseler, and Marian Dörk. 2020. “The Close-up Cloud: Visualizing Details of Image Collections in Dynamic Overviews.” International Journal for Digital Art History 5: 6.2–6.13.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, Sean, Jeffrey Heer, Catherine Plaisant, Jessie Kennedy, Frank van Ham, Nathalie Henry Riche, Chris Weaver, Bongshin Lee, Dominique Brodbeck, and Paolo Buono. 2011. “Research Directions in Data Wrangling: Visualizations and Transformations for Usable and Credible Data.” Information Visualization 10 (4): 271–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Jenny. 2017. “Debating Contemporary Museum Ethics: Reporting Sekhemka.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 23 (6): 493–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Lauren F. 2013. “The Image of Absence: Archival Silence, Data Visualization, and James Hemings.” American Literature 85 (4): 661–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, Jon, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Cass R. Sunstein. 2018. “Discrimination in the Age of Algorithms.” Journal of Legal Analysis 10: 113–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosminsky, Doris, Jagoda Walny, Jo Vermeulen, Søren Knudsen, Wesley Willett, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2019. “Belief at First Sight: Data Visualization and the Rationalization of Seeing.” Information Design Journal 25 (1): 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kräutli, Florian. 2016. Visualising Cultural Data: Exploring Digital Collections Through Timeline Visualisations. PhD Thesis. Royal College of Art. Accessed 30 July 2020. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/1774/.
   Google Scholar
• Kräutli, Florian, and Matteo Valleriani. 2018. “CorpusTracer: A CIDOC Database for Tracing Knowledge Networks.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 33 (2): 336–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kräutli, Florian, and Stephen Boyd Davis. 2013. “Known Unknowns: Representing Uncertainty in Historical Time.” In Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts 2013, edited by Benjamin R. Cowan, Chris P. Bowers, and Russell Beale, 61–68. London: British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kusner, Matt J., and Joshua R. Loftus. 2020. “The Long Road to Fairer Algorithms: Build Models That Identify and Mitigate the Causes of Discrimination.” Nature 578: 34–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster, Marc W., Christoph Ludwig, Yahya Al-Hajj, and Thomas Selig. 2011. “TextGrid Provenance Tools for Digital Humanities Ecosystems.” 5th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2011), 31 May–3 June 2011, Daejeon, Korea. 317–323
   Google Scholar
• Lengyel, Dominik, and Catherine Toulouse. 2020. “Artificial Imagination Induced by Visualised Hypotheses in Archaeology.” Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts 2020, London. 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Dawei, Jonathan Crabtree, Ingrid Dillo, Robert R. Downs, Rorie Edmunds, David Giaretta, Marisa De Giusti, et al. 2020. “The TRUST Principles for Digital Repositories.” Scientific Data 7 (144). Accessed 21 January 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, Astrid, and M. Y. Svensson. 2019. “Road Safety: the Average Male as a Norm in Vehicle Occupant Crash Safety Assessment.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 44 (2): 140–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LwM. 2019a. “Living with Machines: Rethinking Research to Illuminate Our Past.” Living with Machines. Accessed 28 July 2020. http://livingwithmachines.ac.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• LwM. 2019b. “Living with Machines: Understanding History with New Eyes”. Living with Machines. Accessed 31 July 2020. http://livingwithmachines.ac.uk/about/.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, Alan M., Robert E. Roth, James O’Brien, Bonan Li, Derek Swingley, and Mark Gahegan. 2012. “Visual Semiotics & Uncertainty Visualization: An Empirical Study.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18 (12): 2496–2505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malis, Jon. 2020. “Accurate Representations of Digital Copyslides: The Colour of Yves Klein.” Proc. Electronic Visualisation and the Arts 2020, London. 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Rodilla, Patricia, and Cesar Gonzalez-Perez. 2019. “Conceptualization and Non-Relational Implementation of Ontological and Epistemic Vagueness of Information in Digital Humanities.” Informatics 6 (2): 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft Corporation. 2020. In Brands We Trust: the Intersection of Privacy and Trust in the Age of the Empowered Consumer. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Moltrup, Megan. 2019. “Herstory of Graphic Design: Elaine Lustig Cohen.” Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals 15 (2-3): 167–177.
   Google Scholar
• Moncla, Ludovic, Katherine McDonough, Denis Vigier, Thierry Joliveau, and Alice Brenon. 2019. “Toponym Disambiguation in Historical Documents Using Network Analysis of Qualitative Relationships.” In Proc. 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL (GeoHumanities 19), Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Oonagh, and Elena Villaespesa. 2020. AI: A Museum Planning Toolkit. Goldsmiths, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• NLS Maps. 2020. Ordnance Survey Maps – Six-inch England and Wales, 1842-1952. Accessed 30 July 2020. https://maps.nls.uk/os/6inch-england-and-wales/info1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowviskie, Bethany. 2004. “Speculative Computing: Instruments for Interpretive Scholarship.” (PhD Dissertation). Department of English, University of Virginia., Accessed 29 July 2020. http://nowviskie.org/dissertation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nowviskie, Bethany, David McClure, Wayne Graham, Adam Soroka, Jeremy Boggs, and Eric Rochester. 2013. “Geo-temporal Interpretation of Archival Collections with Neatline.” Literary & Linguistic Computing 28 (4): 692–699.
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, Julianne, and Andrew Flinn. 2016. Computation and the Humanities: Towards an Oral History of Digital Humanities. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Obermeyer, Ziad, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. “Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations.” Science 366 (6464): 447–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sora, and Justine Humphry. 2019. “Exclusion by Design: Intersections of Social, Digital and Data Exclusion.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (7): 934–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvaneh, Giv. 2013. RoyGBiv. Accessed 29 July 2020. https://github.com/givp/RoyGBiv.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, Bhin, Alex Streit, and Ross Brown. 2009. “Visualisation of Information Uncertainty: Progress and Challenges.” In Trends in Interactive Visualization, edited by Elena Zudilova-Seinstra, Tony Adriaansen, and Robert Robert van Liere, 19–48. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pim, H. 2018. Exploring Wellcome Collection with Computer Vision. Wellcome Collection. Weblog. Accessed 30 July 2020. https://stacks.wellcomecollection.org/exploring-wellcome-collection-with- computer-vision-7513dff8126d.
   Google Scholar
• Poletti, Chiara, and Daniel Gray. 2019. “Good Data Is Critical Data: An Appeal for Critical Digital Studies.” In Good Data, edited by Angela Daly, S. Kate Devitt, and Monique Mann, 260–276. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu, Vinay Uday, and Abeba Birhane. 2020. Large Image Datasets: A Pyrrhic Win for Computer Vision? Accessed 31 July 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.16923.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. 1764. A Description of a Chart of Biography, Warrington: [no publisher]. British Library General Reference Collection 10604.aa.11.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, Joseph. 1765. A Chart of Biography. London: [no publisher]. British Library General Reference Collection 611.l.19.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha Souza, Renato, Amelie Dorn, Barbara Piringer, and Eveline Wandl-Vogt. 2019. “Towards A Taxonomy of Uncertainties: Analysing Sources of Spatio-Temporal Uncertainty on the Example of Non-Standard German Corpora.” Informatics 6 (3): 34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruis, A. R., and David Williamson Shaffer. 2017. “Annals and Analytics: The Practice of History in the Age of Big Data.” Medical History 61 (2): 336–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacha, Dominik, Hansi Senaratne, Bum Chul Kwon, Geoffrey Ellis, and Daniel A. Keim. 2016. “The Role of Uncertainty, Awareness, and Trust in Visual Analytics.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22 (1): 240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandahl, Jette. 2019. “Addressing Societal Responsibilities Through Core Museum Functions and Methods: The Museum Definition, Prospects and Potentials.” Museum International 71 (1-2): iv–iv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, Una Ulrike. 2018. “Uncertainty Visualization and Digital 3D Modeling in Archaeology – a Brief Introduction.” Digital Art History 3: 86–106.
   Google Scholar
• Setlhabi, Keletso Gaone. 2012. “The Curation of Transition: From Manual to Electronic Documentation Systems.” Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals 8 (1): 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Kathleen L. 2010. “Flinders Petrie and Eugenics at UCL.” Bulletin of the History of Archaeology 20 (1): 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Simonyan, Karen, and Andrew Zisserman. 2015. “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition.” Proc. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2015). San Diego, CA, 7–9 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Skeels, Meredith, Bongshin Lee, Greg Smith, and George G. Robertson. 2009. “Revealing Uncertainty for Information Visualization.” Information Visualization 9 (1): 70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilkov, Daniel, Shan Carter, D. Sculley, Fernanda B. Viégas, and Martin Wattenberg. 2017. Direct-Manipulation Visualization of Deep Networks. ArXiv abs/1708.03788. n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, David A., and Ryan Cordell. 2019. A Research Agenda for Historical and Multilingual Optical Character Recognition. Boston, MA: Northeastern University.
   Google Scholar
• Strothotte, Thomas, Maic Masuch, and Tobias Isenberg. 1999. “Visualizing Knowledge about Virtual Reconstructions of Ancient Architecture.” Proceedings Computer Graphics International, Canmore, Alta., Canada, 1999. 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tateosian, Laura, Michelle Glatz, and Makiko Shukunobe. 2020. “Story-telling Maps Generated from Semantic Representations of Events.” Behaviour & Information Technology 39 (4): 391–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therón Sánchez, Roberto, Alejandro Benito Santos, Rodrigo Santamaría Vicente, and Antonio Losada Gómez. 2019. “Towards an Uncertainty-Aware Visualization in the Digital Humanities.” Informatics 6 (3): 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolfo, Giorgia, Olivia Vane, Kaspar Beelen, Kasra Hosseini, Jon Lawrence, David Beavan, and Katherine McDonough. 2021. “Hunting for Treasure: Living with Machines and the British Library Newspaper Collection.”
   Google Scholar
• Tóth-Czifra, Erzsébet. 2020. “The Risk of Losing the Thick Description: Data Management Challenges Faced by the Arts and Humanities in the Evolving FAIR Data Ecosystem.” In Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research, edited by Jennifer Edmond. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. 235–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0192
   Google Scholar
• Trček, Denis. 2009. “A Formal Apparatus for Modeling Trust in Computing Environments.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 49 (1–2): 226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufte, Edward Rolf. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. 2nd ed. Cheshire, Conn: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, Ted. 2018. “Why an Age of Machine Learning Needs the Humanities.” Public Books. Accessed 2 July 2020. https://www.publicbooks.org/why-an-age-of-machine-learning-needs-the-humanities/.
   Google Scholar
• Valleriani, Matteo, Florian Kräutli, Maryam Zamani, Alejandro Tejedor, Christoph Sander, Malte Vogl, Sabine Bertram, Gesa Funke, and Holger Kantz. 2019. “The Emergence of Epistemic Communities in the Sphaera Corpus: Mechanisms of Knowledge Evolution.” Journal of Historical Network Research 3: 50–91.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ruymbeke, Muriel, Pierre Hallot, and Roland Billen. 2017. “Enhancing CIDOC-CRM and Compatible Models with the Concept of Multiple Interpretation.” Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences IV-2/W2: 287–294.
   Google Scholar
• Vane, Olivia. 2019. Timeline Design for Visualising Cultural Heritage Data. PhD Thesis, Royal College of Art. Accessed 29 July 2020. https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/4325/.
   Google Scholar
• Verbert, Katrien, Karsten Seipp, Chen He, Denis Parra, Chirayu Wongchokprasitti, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2016. “Scalable Exploration of Relevance Prospects to Support Decision Making.” Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems (IntRS 2016) 16 September 2016, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, Howard. 1997. Visual Revelations: Graphical Tales of Fate and Deception from Napoleon Bonaparte To Ross Perot. New York: Copernicus/Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Ken. 2018. “Social Networks, the 2016 US Presidential Election, and Kantian Ethics: Applying the Categorical Imperative to Cambridge Analytica’s Behavioral Microtargeting.” Journal of Media Ethics 33 (3): 133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Anne, and Patrick Dunleavy. 2010. Making and Breaking Whitehall Departments: A Guide to Machinery of Government Changes. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Lyneise. 2019. “What Computational Archival Science Can Learn from Art History and Material Culture Studies.” Proc. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. 3153–3155.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Betsy Anne, Catherine F. Brooks, and Yotam Shmargad. 2018. “How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications.” Journal of Information Policy 8: 78–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windhager, Florian, Paolo Federico, Günther Schreder, Katrin Glinka, Marian Dörk, Silvia Miksch, and Eva Mayr. 2018. “Visualization of Cultural Heritage Collection Data: State of the Art and Future Challenges.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25 (6): 2311–2330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windhager, Florian, Saminu Salisu, and Eva Mayr. 2019. “Exhibiting Uncertainty: Visualizing Data Quality Indicators for Cultural Collections.” Informatics 6 (3): 29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windhager, Florian, Saminu Salisu, Günther Schreder, and Eva Mayr. 2019. “Uncertainty of What and for Whom – and Does Anyone Care? Propositions for Cultural Collection Visualization.” 4th IEEE Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (VIS4DH 2019) Vancouver. [n.p.].
   Google Scholar
• Won, Miguel, Patricia Murrieta-Flores, and Bruno Martins. 2018. “Ensemble Named Entity Recognition (NER): Evaluating NER Tools in the Identification of Place Names in Historical Corpora.” Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5 (2): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Kirsten. 2019. “Archival Interventions and the Language we Use.” Archival Science 19 (4): 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yale University Library Digital Humanities Lab. 2017. Neural Neighbors. Accessed 30 July 2020. https://dhlab.yale.edu/projects/neural-neighbors/.
   Google Scholar
• Zamani, Maryam, Alejandro Tejedor, Malte Vogl, Florian Kräutli, Matteo Valleriani, and Holger Kantz. 2020. “Evolution and Transformation of Early Modern Cosmological Knowledge: A Network Study.” Nature Scientific Reports 10: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žliobaitė, Indrė. 2017. “Measuring Discrimination in Algorithmic Decision Making.” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 31 (4): 1060–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar