Daring to disentangle: towards a framework for art-science-technology collaborations

References

• Anzures, F. A. S., and L. Marques. 2022. “The LED Lamp Metaphor: Knowledge and the Creative Process in new Media art.” Poetics, 92: 101644. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, K. 2017. “A Very Public Affair: Art Meets Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 42 (4): 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascott, R. 2000. Art, Technology, Consciousness mind@large. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ausburg, T. 2017. “Interdisciplinary Arts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Robert Froedman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Roberto C. S. Pacheco, 131–143. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., G. Born, and G. Weszkalnys. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H. 2012. The Conflict of the Faculties – Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. The Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H., P. Peters, and T. Pinch. 2020. Dialogues between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Born, G., and A. Barry. 2010. “ART-SCIENCE from Public Understanding to Public Experiment.” Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (1): 103–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, L. 2003. “A Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration.” Social Work 48 (3): 297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and M. Stone. 2015. “Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 647–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, J., and P. Schyfter. 2017. “What can Science and Technology Studies Learn from Art and Design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics.’” Social Studies of Science 47 (2): 195–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas, E., S. Rodegher, and K. Hamilton. 2021. “The Future of Arts Integrative Work; Creating New Avenues for Advancing and Expanding the Field.” In Routledge Handbook of Art, Science and Technology Studies, edited by Megan K. Halpern, Dehlia Hannah, and Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone, 273–395. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cateforis, D., S. Duval, and S. Steiner. 2019. Hybrid Practices Art in Collaboration with Science and Technology in the Long 1960s. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darbellay, F., Z. Moody, A. Sedooka, and G. Steffen. 2014. “Interdisciplinary Research Boosted by Serendipity.” Creativity Research Journal 26 (1): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A. 2005. Transvergence in Art History. Switch, 20, CADRE Laboratory for New Media, San Jose State University, CA. Accessed January 7, 2021. http://www.ekac.org/transvergence.html
   Google Scholar
• De Wachter, E. M. 2017. Co-Art: Artists on Creative Collaboration. London: Phaidon Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, H. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Artful Doing in Spaces of Experimentation and Imagination.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 3: 44–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, H. 2017. “Transdisciplinary Hermeneutics: A Symbiosis of Science, Art, Philosophy, Reflective Practice, and Subjective Experience.” Issues In Interdisciplinary Studies 35: 170–199.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated from the French by George Simpson. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ede, S. 2005. Art and Science. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. 2009. “Aesthetics and the Two Cultures: Why Art and Science Should Be Allowed to Go their Separate Ways.” In Rediscovering Aesthetics, Transdisciplinary Voices from Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice, edited by T. O’Connor, F. Hallsall, and J. Jansen, 34–50. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, L. 2014. “Arts-Science Collaboration, Embodied Research Methods, and the Politics of Belonging: ‘SiteWorks’ and the Shoalhaven River, Australia.” Cultural Geographies 21 (2): 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B., and D. J. Wood. 1991. “Collaborative Alliances: Moving from Practice to Theory.” Journal of Behavioral Science 27 (1): 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. 1990. Groups that Work (and Those That Don't). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K. L., A. L. Vogel, B. Stipelman, D. Stokols, G. Morgan, and S. Gehlert. 2012. “A Four-Phase Model of Transdisciplinary Team-Based Research: Goals, Team Processes, and Strategies.” TBM 2: 415–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, M., J. Suoranta, and T. Vaden. 2014. Artistic Research Methodology, Narrative, Power and the Public, e-book, www.peterlang.com.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1972) 2002. Critical Theory Selected Essays. New York: The Continuum. (Horkheimer, Max, 1895–1973. Critical Theory. Translation of: Kritische Theorie. “Essays from the Zeitschrift fur Soaalforschung” – Pref. Reprint, Originally published, New York: Seabury Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. A., and P. Gallison. 1998. Picturing Science Producing Art. New York: Routlage.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. H. 2011. The One and the Many, Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. 2017. “Typologies of Interdisciplinarity: The Boundary Work of Definition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 2nd ed., edited by R. Froedman, J. T. Klein, and C. S. Pacheco, 21–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.42 (e-book).
   Google Scholar
• Koek, A. 2017. “In/Visible: The Inside Story of the Making of Arts at CERN.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 42 (4): 345–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, J. 2005. “‘Being in Between’: Art-Science Collaborations and a Technological Culture, Social Analysis.” The International Journal of Anthropology 49 (1): 141–160.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J. 2011. “The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist – Emergent Distinctions in an Interdisciplinary Collaboration.” Social Analysis 55 (3): 143–163.
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, J. E., and M. Macklin. 2019. “Art-Geoscience Encounters and Entanglements in the Watery Realm.” Journal of Maps 15 (3): 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malina, R. F. 2006. “Welcoming Uncertainty: The Strong Case for Coupling the Contemporary Arts to Science and Technology.” In Artists in Labs: Process of Inquiry, edited by Jill Scott, 15–23. Wien: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mansilla, V. B. 2006. “Interdisciplinary Work at The Frontier: An Empirical Examination of Expert Interdisciplinary Epistemologies.” Issues in Integrative Studies 24: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. 2006. “Activism vs. Antagonism: Socially Engaged Art from Bourriaud to Bishop and Beyond.” FIELD Journal of Socially Engaged Arts Criticism 3: 165–183.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. 2014. Colliding Worlds How Cutting-Edge Science is Redefining Contemporary Art. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, L., J. Bennett, L. Froggett, and V. Bartlett. 2020. “Emergent Knowledge in the Third Space of Art-Science.” Leonardo 53 (3): 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2010. “Methodology of Transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 1 (1): 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2014. “Methodology of Transdisciplinarity.” World Futures 70 (3-4): 186–199. doi:10.1080/02604027.2014.934631.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozog, M. 2009. “Art Investigating Science: Critical Art as a Meta-discourse of Science, Cognition and Creativity.” Digital Arts and Culture. Arts Computation Engineering, UC Irvine. Accessed September 2, 2021. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4k9509qj.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., J. T. Klein, S. Hoffmann, C. Mitchell, and D. Fam. 2021. “Conceptualising Transdisciplinary Integration as a Multidimensional Interactive Process.” Environmental Science and Policy 118: 18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl C, B. Truffer, and G.H. Hadorn. 2017. Addressing Wicked Problems Through Transdisciplinary Research. In: The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd ed., edited by Robert Frodeman, J. T. Klein, and R. S. C. Pacheco, 319–331. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., N. H. Newell, and R. Szostak. 2012. Case Studies in Interdisciplinary Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, S. 1984. “The Interaction of Art and Science.” Leonardo 17 (2): 81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Root-Bernstein, R. S. 1996. “The Sciences and Arts Share a Common Creative Aesthetic.” In The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science, edited by Alfred I. Tauber, 49–82 . Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 182. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1786-6_3
   Google Scholar
• Root-Bernstein, R. S., T. Siler, A. Brown, and K. Snelson. 2011. “ArtScience: Integrative Collaboration to Create a Sustainable Future.” Leonardo 44 (3): 192. doi:10.1162/LEON_e_00161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2007. “Unstated Contributions – How Artistic Inquiry Can Inform Interdisciplinary Research.” International Journal of Design 1 (3): 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, C. 2021. “The art-Science Complex.” In Routledge Handbook of Art, Science and Technology Studies, edited by Megan K. Halpern, Dehlia Hannah, and Kathryn de Ridder-Vignone, 273–395. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schnugg, C. 2019. Creating Art Science Collaboration. Switzerland: Cham: Palgrave MacMillen.
   Google Scholar
• Shanken, E. A. 2005. “Artists in Industry and the Academy: Interdisciplinary Research Collaborations.” Leonardo 38 (4): 278–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, R. 1984. “The Interaction of Art and Science.” Leonardo 17 (2): 81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleigh, C., and S. Craske. 2017. “Art and Science in the UK: A Brief History and Critical Reflection.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 42 (4): 313–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. 1959. The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. The Rede Lecture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. 1964. The Two Cultures and a Second Look: An Expanded Version of the Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., S. Misra, R. P. Moser, K. L. Hall, and B. K. Taylor. 2008. “The Ecology of Team Science Understanding Contextual Influences on Transdisciplinary Collaboration.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 (2S): S96–S115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., and J. L. Perry. 2006. “Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box.” Public Administration Review. Special Issue, 66: 20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., J. L. Perry, and T. K. Miller. 2009. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (1): 23–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verena, H., and M. L. Kaiser. 2021. “An Alphabetical Order of Accusations, Beginnings and Groceries.” A Report on connecting, writing and improvisation. https://jegensentevens.nl/2021/11/an-alphabetic-order-of-accusations-beginnings-and-groceries-on-connecting-writing-and-improvisation/?fbclid=IwAR3YK10qHXz6EutqYtuuEj8dRwAIg3h52Zn9w-jXd4YU3KorXoZjGI6xcFU.
   Google Scholar
• Vesna, V. 2001. “Towards a Third Culture: Being in Between.” Leonardo 34 (2): 121–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesna, V., B. Campbell, and F. Samsel. 2019. “Victoria Vesna: Inviting Meaningful Organic Art-Science Collaboration.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 39 (4): 8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vienni Bapista, B., M. Maryl, P. Wciślik, I. Fletcher, A. Buchner, D. Wallace, and C. Pohl. 2019. SHAPE-ID: Shaping Interdisciplinary Practices in Europe. Preliminary Report of Literature Review on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research. www.shapeID.eu (https://www.shapeid.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/SHAPE-ID-822705-D2.1-Preliminary-Report-on-Literature-Review.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., A. L. Carew, and A. W. Russell. 2006. “Transdisciplinary Research: Characteristics, Quandaries and Quality.” Futures 38: 1046–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2002. Information Arts, Intersections of Art, Science, and Technology. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zurr, I., and O. Catts. 2020. “Tense-disciplinary Collaborations with Frontier Technologies.” Non-Traditional Research Outcomes (NTRO). Accessed September 2, 2021. https://nitro.edu.au/articles/2020/8/31/tense-disciplinary-collaborations-with-frontier-technologies.
   Google Scholar