Scientism and scientific fundamentalism: what science can learn from mainstream religion

References

• Almond, Gabriel A., R. Scott Appleby, and Emmanuel Sivan. 2003. Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalisms Around the World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, William P. 2003. “Religious Language and Verificationism.” In The Rationality of Theism, edited by Paul Copan and Paul K. Moser, 17–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, Peter W. 1995. “Science as Truth.” History of the Human Sciences 8 (2): 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, Justin M. 2012. Born Believers: The Science of Children’s Religious Belief. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Wynette. 2009. “What’s Fundamental about Fundamentalism?” Psychological Perspectives 52 (4): 436–444.
   Google Scholar
• Baurmann, Michael. 2007. “Rational Fundamentalism? An Explanatory Model of Fundamentalist Beliefs.” Episteme 4 (2): 150–166.
   Google Scholar
• Bering, Jesse. 2011. The God Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life. London: Nicholas Brealey.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, Francis. 1994. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. New York: Touchstone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, Oliver Scott, Daniel Austin Mullins, and Harvey Whitehouse. 2019. “Is It Good to Cooperate: Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies.” Current Anthropology 60 (1): 47–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Ridder, Jeroen. 2014. “Science and Scientism in Popular Science Writing.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (12): 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. London: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Richard, and Ted Warfield, eds. 2011. Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Sam. 2010. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Austin L. 2012. “The Folly of Scientism.” The New Atlantis 37 (Fall), http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-folly-of-scientism.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, Anthony I., and Andreas Roepstorff, eds. 2003. Trusting the Subject: The Use of Introspective Evidence in Cognitive Science. Vol. 1, Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (9–10).
   Google Scholar
• Kindermann, Nora, Rik Peels, Anke I. Liefbroer, and Linda Schoonmade. “Mapping Definitions of ‘Fundamentalism’: A Scoping Review”. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Krüger, J. S. 2006. “Religious Fundamentalism: Aspects of a Comparative Framework of Understanding.” Verbum et Ecclesia 27 (3): 886–908.
   Google Scholar
• Libet, Benjamin. 1985. “Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 529–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, George M. 1980. Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, George M. 1991. Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Marty, Martin E., and R. Scott Appleby, eds. 1991-1995. The Fundamentalism Project, 5 volumes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, Mary. 1992. Science as Salvation: A Modern Myth and Its Meaning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, Moti. 2017. “What’s So Bad About Scientism?” Social Epistemology 31 (4): 351–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2017. “Ten Reasons to Embrace Scientism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 63: 11–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2018a. “A Conceptual Map of Scientism.” In Scientism: Prospects and Problems, edited by Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels, and René van Woudenberg, 28–56. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2018b. “The Fundamental Argument Against Scientism.” In Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism, edited by Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci, 165–184. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2019. “Should We Accept Scientism? The Argument from Self-Referential Incoherence.” In Knowing in Science: An Introduction, edited by Kevin Ray McCain and Kostas Kampourakis, 274–187. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2022. “On Defining ‘Fundamentalism’”, Religious Studies, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000683.
   Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2023a. Life Without God: An Outsider’s Look at Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peels, Rik. 2023b. Monotheism and Fundamentalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereboom, Derk. 2001. Living Without Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pigliucci, Massimo. 2013. “New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1): 142–153.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, Alvin. 1967. God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plato. 1977. Thaetetus. Translated by M.J. Levett. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provine, William. 1988. “Evolution and the Foundations of Ethics.” Marine Biology Laboratory Science 3: 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Thomas. 1997. An Inquiry Into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense, Edited by Derek R. Brookes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, Nicholas. 1984. The Limits of Science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Alex. 2011. The Atheist’s Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life Without Illusions. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Don, James Ladyman, and David Spurrett. 2007. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, Malise. 2004. Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, Ninian. 1989. The World’s Religions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenmark, Mikael. 2001. Scientism: Science, Ethics and Religion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Sharon. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, Dick. 2014. We Are Our Brains. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
   Google Scholar
• Turri, John. 2011. “The Express Knowledge Account of Assertion.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1): 37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Woudenberg, René. 2011. “Truths That Science Cannot Touch.” Philosophia Reformata 76: 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Van Woudenberg, René. 2013. “Limits of Science and the Christian Faith.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 65 (1): 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, Daniel. 2002. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953/2001. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpert, Lewis. 1992. The Unnatural Nature of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Simon A., and David Harrington Watt, eds. 2014. Fundamentalism: Perspectives on a Contested History. Columbia, SC: The University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar