References
- Baumeister, Roy F., Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2001. “Bad is Stronger Than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5 (4): 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
- Box Office Mojo. n.d. ‘All-time – Top Lifetime Grosses – Worldwide.’ Accessed January 18, 2023. https://www.boxofficemojo.com/chart/ww_top_lifetime_gross/?area = XWW.
- Cova, Florian, Julien Deonna, and David Sander. 2017. “‘That’s Deep!’: The Role of Being Moved and Feelings of Profundity in the Appreciation of Serious Narratives.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism, edited by Donald R. Wehrs and Thomas Blake, 347–369. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hanich, Julian, Valentin Wagner, Mira Shah, Thomas Jacobsen, and Winfried Menninghaus. 2014. “‘Why We Like to Watch Sad Films: The Pleasure of Being Moved in Aesthetic Experiences.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8 (2): 130–143. doi:10.1037/a0035690
- Keen, Suzanne. 2022. Empathy and Reading: Affect, Impact, and the Co-Creating Reader. New York: Routledge.
- Koopman, Eva Maria (Emy). 2015. ‘Why Do We Read Sad Books? Eudaimonic Motives and Meta-Emotions.’ Poetics 52: 18-31 doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2015.06.004
- Lazarus, John. 2021. “Negativity Bias: An Evolutionary Hypothesis and an Empirical Programme.” Learning and Motivation 75: 101731. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101731
- Menninghaus, Winfried, Valentin Wagner, Julian Hanich, Eugen Wassiliwizky, Thomas Jacobsen, and Stefan Koelsch. 2017. “The Distancing-Embracing Model of the Enjoyment of Negative Emotions in Art Reception.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40: 1–63. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1500062X
- Oliver, Mary Beth. 1993. “Exploring the Paradox of the Enjoyment of Sad Films.” Human Communication Research 19 (3): 315–342. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00304.x
- Pattison, David G. 2001. “Deaths and Laments in Celestina.” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 78 (1): 139–143. doi:10.1080/000749001750058572
- Rozin, Paul, and Edward B. Royzman. 2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (4): 296–320. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
- Simon, Julien Jacques. 2017. “A Wild Fable: Affect and Reception of Fernando de Rojas’ Celestina (1499).” In The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism, edited by Donald R. Wehrs and Thomas Blake, 609–625. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Snow, Joseph T. 2011. “Darkness, Death and Despair in Celestina: An Essay.” eHumanista 19: 317–327.