Exploring the pedestrian level of interaction on platform conflict areas at metro stations by real-scale laboratory experiments

References

• Boltes, M., and A. Seyfried. 2013. “Collecting Pedestrian Trajectories.” Neurocomputing 100: 127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, M., and A. Kwieciński. 1994. Stochastic Approximation to the Effects of Headways on Knock-on Delays of Trains. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 28 (4): 251–267. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreno, M., A. Willis, and S. Stradling. 2002. “Quality of Service for Pedestrians: Closing the Gaps in Knowledge.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies (ICTTS), 326–333. Guilin.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. V., and B. Poyner. 1994. “Preventing Suicide on the London Underground.” Social Science & Medicine 38 (3): 443–446. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90445-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daamen, W., Y. Lee, and P. Wiggenraad. 2008. “Boarding and Alighting Experiments: An Overview of the Set Up and Performance and Some Preliminary Results on the Gap Effects.” Transportation Research Record 2042: 71–81. doi: 10.3141/2042-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ana Rodriguez, G., S. Seriani, and C. Holloway. 2016. “The Impact of Platform Edge Doors on Passengers Boarding and Alighting Time and Platform Behaviour.” Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th annual meeting, Washington, DC, January 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., and R. E. Wener. 2007. “Crowding and Personal Space Invasion on the Train: Please Don’t Make me Sit in the Middle.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (1): 90–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R., A. Valencia, and S. Seriani. 2015. “On Passenger Saturation Flow in Public Transport Doors.” Transportation Research Part A 78: 102–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fruin, J. J. 1971. “Designing for Pedestrians: A Level-of-Service Concept.” Highway Research Record 377: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fujiyama, T., J. Nowers, and N. Tyler. 2008. “ Investigation into Train Dwell Time.” Department for Transport (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Fujiyama, T., R. Thoreau, and N. Tyler. 2014. “The Effects of the Design Factors of the Train–Platform Interface on Pedestrian Flow Rates.” In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, edited by U. Weidmann, U. Kirsch, and M. Schreckenberg, 1163–1173. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Gérin-Lajoie, M., C. L. Richards, J. Fung, and B. J. McFadyen. 2008. “Characteristics of Personal Space During Obstacle Circumvention in Physical and Virtual Environments.” Gait & Posture 27 (2): 239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, S. J., J. Chhugani, S. Curtis, P. Dubey, M. Lin, and D. Manocha. 2010. “ Pledestrians: A Least-Effort Approach to Crowd Simulation.” Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, 119–128. Eurographics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. 1966. The Hidden Dimension, 14, 103–124. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, N. G. 2006. “Train Boarding and Alighting Rates at High Passenger Loads.” Journal of Advanced Transportation 40 (3): 249–263. doi: 10.1002/atr.5670400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnett, J. J., K. G. Bailey, and C. S. Hartley. 1974. “Body Height, Position, and Sex as Determinants of Personal Space.” Journal of Psychology 87: 129–136. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1974.9915683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, C., S. Seriani, D. Boampong, and N. Tyler. 2015. “ The Effect of PEDs on Passenger Movement Time: Initial Analysis of PAMELA Experiments.” Transport for Transport (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, S. P., and W. Daamen. 2005. “Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks.” Transportation Science 39 (2): 147–159. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1040.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karekla, X., and N. Tyler. 2012. “Reduced Dwell Times Resulting from Train–Platform Improvements: The Costs and Benefits of Improving Passenger Accessibility to Metro Trains.” Transportation Planning and Technology 35 (5): 525–543. doi: 10.1080/03081060.2012.693267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakidis, M., R. Hirsch, and A. Majumdar. 2012. “Metro Railway Safety: An Analysis of Accident Precursors.” Safety Science 50 (7): 1535–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, A. 2015. “On Your Marks, Get Set, Queue.” The Straits Times, October 5. Accessed July 6 2016. http://bit.ly/29esYIs.
   Google Scholar
• Little, K. B. 1965. “Personal Space.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1 (3): 237–247. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(65)90028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A., B. D. Taylor, and C. T. Voulgaris. 2015. Passenger Flows in Underground Railway Stations and Platforms MTI Report 12-43. San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J., and F. Dong. 2010. “Statistical Analysis of the Passenger Distribution Before Getting on Subway Train.” Urban Mass Transit 13 (7): 53–56 (Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• LUL. 2012. Station Planning Standards and Guidelines. London: London Underground Limited.
   Google Scholar
• NFPA-130. 2007. “Stations.” Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems. MA: National Fire Protection Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pushkarev, B., and J. Zupan. 1975. Urban Space for Pedestrians. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, L., and W. K. Chow. 2012. “Platform Screen Doors on Emergency Evacuation in Underground Railway Stations.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 30: 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RSSB. 2008. Management of On-Train Crowding Final Report. London: Rail Safety and Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• RSSB. 2015. Platform Train Interface Strategy. London: Rail Safety and Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, J. L. 1976. “Relationship of Personal Space to Body Image Boundary Definiteness.” Journal of Research in Personality 10: 478–481. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(76)90062-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seriani, S., and R. Fernandez. 2015a. “Planning Guidelines for Metro-bus Interchanges by Means of a Pedestrian Microsimulation Model in Chile.” Transportation Planning and Technology 38 (5): 569–583. doi: 10.1080/03081060.2015.1039235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seriani, S., and R. Fernandez. 2015b. “Pedestrian Traffic Management of Boarding and Alighting in Metro Stations.” Transportation Research Part C 53: 76–92. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfried, A., T. Rupprecht, O. Passon, B. Steffen, W. Klingsch, and M. Boltes. 2009. “New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks.” Transportation Science 43: 395–406. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. 2001. “The Research for Dynamic Distribution of Passenger and the Width of Platform.” Urban Rapid Transit 4 (1): 21–25 (Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. 2008. “Simplified Calculation for the Width of On and Off Regions of Station Platform.” Urban Rapid Transit 21 (5): 9–12 (Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, R. 1969. Personal Space: The Behavioral Bases of Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Still, K. 2000. “Crowd Dynamics.” PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Teknomo, K. 2006. “Application of Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model.” Transportation Research Part F 9 (1): 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2005.08.006
   Google Scholar
• TfL. 2014. London Underground Performance Reports. Entry and Exit Figures by Station. London: Transport for London. Accessed July 6 2016. http://bit.ly/29oF6FE.
   Google Scholar
• TRB. 2003. Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• TRB. 2013. Report 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Von Sivers, I., and G. Köster. 2015. “Dynamic Stride Length Adaptation According to Utility and Personal Space.” Transportation Research Part B 74: 104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.01.009
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. D., and M. J. Weber. 2003. “Influence of Sensor Abilities on the Interpersonal Distance of the Elderly.” Environment and Behavior 35 (5): 695–711. doi: 10.1177/0013916503251473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMAT. 2015. “ Passenger Flow and Train Dwell Time.” Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Accessed July 6 2016. http://bit.ly/29jCMDl.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and S. Ma. 2013. “Division Method for Waiting Areas on Island Platforms at Metro Stations.” Journal of Transportation Engineering 139 (4): 339–349. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar