Variable consistency and variable precision models for dominance-based fuzzy rough set analysis of possibilistic information systems

References

• Luca , A. and Termini , S. 1972 . A Definition of a Nonprobabilistic Entropy in the Setting of Fuzzy Sets Theory . Information and Control , 20 ( 4 ) : 301 – 312 .
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, M., D. Sánchez, M. Martín-Bautista, and M. Vila. 2002. “A  Probabilistic Definition of a Nonconvex Fuzzy Cardinality.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 126 (2): 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois , D. and Prade , H. 1990 . Rough fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Rough Sets . International Journal of General Systems , 17 : 191 – 209 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois , D. and Prade , H. 2001 . Possibility theory, probability theory and multiplevalued logics: A clarification . Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence , 32 ( 1–4 ) : 35 – 66 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, T., C. Liau, and D. Liu. 2009. “Dominance-Based Rough Set Analysis of Uncertain Data Table.” In Proceedings of the International Fuzzy Systems Association (IFSA) World Congress and the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT) Conference, edited by J. Carvalho, D. Dubois, U. Kaymak, and J. Sousa, 294–299. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Fan , T. , Liau , C. and Liu , D. 2011 . Dominance-based Fuzzy Rough Set Analysis of Uncertain and Possibilistic Data Tables . International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 52 : 1283 – 1297 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, T., C. Liau, and D. Liu. 2011b. “Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach for Possibilistic Information systems.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining and Granular Computing. LNCS. Vol. 6743, edited by S. O. Kuznetsov, D. Slezak, D. H. Hepting, and B. Mirkin, 119–126. Moscow, Russia: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Glöckner , I. 2004 . Evaluation of Quantified Propositions in Generalized Models of Fuzzy Quantification . International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 37 ( 2 ) : 93 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco , S. , Matarazzo , B. and Słowiński , R. 2001 . Rough Set Theory for Multicriteria Decision Analysis . European Journal of Operational Research , 129 ( 1 ) : 1 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco , S. , Matarazzo , B. and Słowiński , R. 2002 . Rough Sets Methodology for Sorting Problems in Presence of Multiple Attributes and Criteria . European Journal of Operational Research , 138 ( 2 ) : 247 – 259 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco , S. , Matarazzo , B. and Słowiński , R. 2004 . Axiomatic Characterization of a General Utility Ffunction and its Particular Cases in Terms of Conjoint Measurement and Rough-set Decision Rules . European Journal of Operational Research , 158 ( 2 ) : 271 – 292 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco , S. , Matarazzo , B. and Słowiński , R. 2007 . Dominance-based Rough Set Approach as a Proper Way of Handling Graduality in Rough Set Theory . Transactions on Rough Sets , VII : 36 – 52 .
   Google Scholar
• Greco, S., B. Matarazzo, R. Słowiński, and J. Stefanowski. 2000. “Variable Consistency Model of Dominance Based Rough Sets Approach.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, LNAI 2005, edited by W. Ziarko, and Y. Y. Yao, 170–181. Banff, Canada: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek , P. 1998 . Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic , Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Inuiguchi, M. 2009. “Rough Set Approach to Rule Induction from Imprecise Decision Tables.” Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, LNAI, Vol. 5571, edited by V. Gesú, S. Pal, and A. Petrosino, 68–76. Palermo, Italy: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Inuiguchi , M. , Yoshioka , Y. and Kusunoki , Y. 2009 . Variable-precision dominance based rough set approach and attribute reduction . International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 50 ( 8 ) : 1199 – 1214 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryszkiewicz, M. 1998. “Properties of Incomplete Information Systems in the Framework of Rough Sets.” In Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery, edited by L. Polkowski, and A. Skowron, 422–450. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lipski , W. 1981 . On databases with incomplete information . Journal of the ACM , 28 ( 1 ) : 41 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myszkorowski, K. 2011. “Multiargument Relationships in Fuzzy Databases with Attributes Represented by Interval-Valued Possibility Distributions.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, DataMining and Granular Computing. LNCS, Vol. 6743, edited by S. Kuznetsov, D. Slezak, D. Hepting, and B. Mirkin, 199–206. Moscow, Russia: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H., and D. Slezak. 1999. “Approximate Reducts and Association Rules-Correspondence and Complexity Results.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Rough Sets, Data Mining, and Granular-Soft Computing. LNCS, Vol. 1711, edited by N. Zhong, A. Skowron, and S. Ohsuga, 137–145. Yamaguchi, Japan: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak , Z. 1982 . Rough Sets . International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences , 11 ( 15 ) : 341 – 356 .
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z. 1991. Rough Sets – Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Radzikowska , A. and Kerre , E. 2002 . A Comparative Study of Fuzzy Rough Sets . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 126 ( 2 ) : 137 – 155 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai, H., M. Nakata, and Slezak, D. 2011. “A Prototype System for Rule Generation in Lipskis Incomplete Information Databases.” In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, DataMining and Granular Computing. LNCS, Vol. 6743, edited by Kuznetsov, S., D. Slezak, D. Hepting, and B. Mirkin, 175–182. Moscow, Russia: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Slezak , D. 2002 . Approximate Entropy Reducts . Fundamenta Informaticae , 53 ( 3–4 ) : 365 – 390 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slezak , D. 2005 . Rough sets and Bayes factor . Transactions on Rough Sets , III : 202 – 229 .
   Google Scholar
• Slezak , D. and Ziarko , W. 2005 . The Investigation of the Bayesian Rough Set Model . International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 40 ( 1–2 ) : 81 – 91 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Słowiński, R., S. Greco, and B. Matarazzo. 2002. “Rough Set Analysis of Preferenceordered Data.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. LNAI, Vol. 2475, edited by Alpigini, J., J. Peters, A. Skowron, and N. Zhong, 44–59. Malvern, PA, USA: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Susmaga , R. , Słowiński , R. , Greco , S. and Matarazzo , B. 2000 . Generation of Reducts and Rules in Multi-attribute and Multi-criteria Classification . Control and Cybernetics , 29 ( 4 ) : 970 – 988 .
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., and Q. Liu. 1999. “A Generalized Decision Logic in Interval-set-valued Information Tables.” In New Directions in Rough Sets, Data Mining, and Granular-Soft Computing. LNAI, Vol. 1711, edited by Zhong, N., A. Skowron, and S. Ohsuga, 285–293. Yamaguchi, Japan: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh , L. 1975 . The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Applications in Approximate Reasoning . Information Sciences , 8 : 199 – 251 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. 1979. “A Theory of Approximate Reasoning.” In Machine Intelligence. Vol. 9, edited by Hayes, J., D. Mitchie, and L. Mikulich, 149–194. New York: Halstead Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh , L. 1983 . A Computational Approach to Fuzzy Quantifiers in Natural Languages . Computers and Mathematics with Applications , 9 ( 1 ) : 149 – 184 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar