Multivalued contexts associated with criteria

References

• Alcalde, C., A. Burusco, H. Bustince, A. Jurío, and J. A. Sanz. 2016. “Evolution in Time of the L-fuzzy Context Sequences.” Information Sciences 326: 202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcalde, C., A. Burusco, R. Fuentes-González, and I. Zubia. 2009. “Treatment of L-fuzzy Contexts with Absent Values.” Information Sciences 179 (1–2): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bělohlávek, R. 1999. “Fuzzy Galois Connections.” Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (4): 497–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bělohlávek, R., and V. Vychodil. 2005. “What is a Fuzzy Concept Lattice.” In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Lattice and their Applications, CLA 2005, Olomounc, Czech Republic, 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Burusco, A., and R. Fuentes-González. 1994. “The Study of the L-fuzzy Concept Lattice.” Mathware and Soft Computing 1 (3): 209–218.
   Google Scholar
• Burusco, A., and R. Fuentes-González. 1997. “Contexts Obtained from Several Expert Opinions.” In Sixth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Barcelona, 339–342.
   Google Scholar
• Burusco, A., and R. Fuentes-González. 1998. “Construction of the L-fuzzy Concept Lattice.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97 (1): 109–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burusco, A., and R. Fuentes-González. 2001a. “Contexts with Multiple Weighted Values.” The International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 9 (3): 355–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burusco, A., and R. Fuentes-González. 2001b. “The Study of the Interval-valued Contexts.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 121: 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burusco, A., and R. Fuentes-González. 2002. “Concepts Associated to Criteria: A Method for Knowledge Processing from Fuzzy Contexts.” The International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems 10 (2): 173–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, T., and R. Mesiar. 2003a. “Weighted Triangular Norms-based Aggregation Operators.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 137: 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, T., and R. Mesiar. 2003b. “Aggregation Operators: Ordering and Bounds.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139: 685–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djouadi, Y., and H. Prade. 2010. “Interval-valued Fuzzy Galois Connections: Algebraic Requirements and Concept Lattice Construction.” Fundamenta Informaticae 99 (2): 169–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djouadi, Y., and H. Prade. 2011. “Possibility-theoretic Extension of Derivation Operators in Formal Concept Analysis over Fuzzy Lattices.” FODM 10 (4): 287–309.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J., and M. Roubens. 1994. “Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support.” In Series: Theory and Decision Library D. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grabisch, M. 1995. “Fuzzy Integral in Multicriteria Decision Making.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 69 (3): 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, A. 1988. “Theory of Expertons and Fuzzy Logic.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 28: 295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J. 2012. “Multi-adjoint Property-oriented Concept Lattices.” Information Sciences 190: 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J., and M. Ojeda-Aciego. 2010. “Multi-adjoint t-concept Lattices.” Information Sciences 180 (5): 712–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J., and M. Ojeda-Aciego. 2013. “Dual Multi-adjoint Concept Lattices.” Information Sciences 225: 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollandt, S. 1997. Fuzzy Begriffe. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sugeno, M. 1974. “Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and its Applications.” PhD diss., Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Torra, V. 1997. “The Weighted OWA Operator.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 12: 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., and G. J. Klir. 1992. Fuzzy Measure Theory. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, R. 1982. “Restructuring Lattice Theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concepts.” In Ordered Sets, edited by I. Rival, 445–470. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. 1988. “On Ordered Weighted Averaging Aggregation Operators in Multi-criteria Decision Making.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18: 183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar