Detecting correlation between extreme probability events

References

• Coletti, G. 1994. “Coherent Numerical and Ordinal Probabilistic Assessments.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24 (12): 1747–1754. doi: 10.1109/21.328932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 1996. “Characterization of Coherent Conditional Probabilities As a Tool for Their Assessment and Extension.” Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 44: 101–132.
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 1998. “Null Events and Stochastical Independence.” Kybernetika 34: 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 1999. “Conditioning and Inference in Intelligent Systems.” Soft Computing 3 (3): 118–130. doi: 10.1007/s005000050060
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 2000. “Zero Probabilities in Stochastic Independence.” In Information, Uncertainty and Fusion, edited by B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. R. Yager, and L. A. Zadeh, Vol. 516. Boston, MA: The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 2002a. Probabilistic Logic in a Coherent Setting. Vol. 15 of Trends in Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., and R. Scozzafava. 2002b. “Stochastic Independence in a Coherent Setting.” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 35: 151–176. doi: 10.1023/A:1014535200933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., R. Scozzafava, and B. Vantaggi. 2001. “Probabilistic Reasoning As a General Unifying Tool.” Lecture Notes 2143: 120–131.
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., L. C. van der Gaag, and D. Petturiti. 2018. “Detecting Correlation Between Extreme Probability Events.” Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Uncertainty Processing (WUPES'18), Třeboň, Czech Republic, edited by J. Vejnarová and V. Kratochvíl, 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• de Finetti, B. 1936. “Les probabilités nulles.” Bulletin des Sciences Mathematiques 40: 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• de Finetti, B. 1949. “Sull'impostazione assiomatica del calcolo delle probabilità.” Annali Triestini 19: 29–81.
   Google Scholar
• de Finetti, B. 1972. Probability, Induction and Statistics: The Art of Guessing. London, New York, Sydney, Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Druzdzel, M. J., and M. Henrion. 1993. “Efficient Reasoning in Qualitative Probabilistic Networks.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 548–553. Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubins, L. E. 1975. “Finitely Additive Conditional Probabilities, Conglomerability and Disintegrations.” The Annals of Probability 3 (1): 89–99. doi: 10.1214/aop/1176996451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flach, P. 2012. Machine Learning: The Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, P. H. 1968. “Representation of Conditional Probability Measures on Boolean Algebras.” Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 19 (3): 229–241. doi: 10.1007/BF01894506
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, S. L., and D. J. Spiegelhalter. 1988. “Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and Their Application to Expert Systems.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 50: 157–224.
   Google Scholar
• Niblett, T., and I. Bratko. 1987. “Learning Decision Rules in Noisy Domains.” In Proceedings of Expert Systems ’86, The 6Th Annual Technical Conference on Research and Development in Expert Systems III, 25–34. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., and P. Norvig. 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scozzafava, R. 1984. “A Survey of Some Common Misunderstandings Concerning the Role and Meaning of Finitely Additive Probabilities in Statistical Inference.” Statistica 44: 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Scozzafava, R., and B. Vantaggi. 2004. “The Role of Zero Probabilities in Dealing with Zero Frequency Problems.” In Soft Methodology and Random Information Systems. Advances in Soft Computing. Vol. 26. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Gaag, L. C., and A. Capotorti. 2018. “Naive Bayesian Classifiers with Extreme Probability Features.” Journal of Machine Learning Research, Proceedings Series 72: 499–510.
   Google Scholar
• Vantaggi, B. 2001. “Conditional Independence in a Finite Additive Setting.” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 32: 287–314. doi: 10.1023/A:1016730003879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantaggi, B. 2002. “The L-separation Criterion for Description of Cs-independence Models.” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 29: 291–316. doi: 10.1016/S0888-613X(01)00069-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantaggi, B. 2003. “Qualitative Bayesian Networks with Logical Constraints.” In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2711., edited by T. D. Nielsen and N. L. Zhang. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, M. P. 1990. “Fundamental Concepts of Qualitative Probabilistic Networks.” Artificial Intelligence 44: 257–303. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90026-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar