Still ‘like birds on the wire’? Freedom after neoliberalism

References

• Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, S. (2011). Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality. Subjectivity, 4(4), 371–394. doi: 10.1057/sub.2011.16
   Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. (1998). Moral disentitlement: Personal autonomy and political reproduction. In S. Hänninen (Ed.), Displacement of social policies (pp. 145–171). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dumm, T. L. (2002). Michel Foucault and the politics of freedom. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281–30). New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2006). Security, territory, population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2016). Progressive neoliberalism versus reactionary populism: A choice that feminists should refuse. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(4), 281–284. doi: 10.1080/08038740.2016.1278263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the globalized world in the twenty-first century. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1979). The great moving right show. Marxism Today, 23(1), 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1985). Authoritarian populism: A reply. New Left Review, 151, 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. v. (1979). Law, legislation and liberty Vol. 3: The political order of a free people. [S.l.]. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P. & Ostiguy, P. (2017). The Oxford handbook on populism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, G. & Reid-Henry, S. (2009). Vital geographies: Life, luck, and the human condition. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(3), 554–574. doi: 10.1080/00045600902967177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentzos, F. & Rose, N. (2009). Governing insecurity: Contingency planning, protection, resilience. Economy and Society, 38(2), 230–254. doi: 10.1080/03085140902786611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. London: Parker.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1080/03085149000000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administrating economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M. & Osborne, T. (2017). Populism: A deflationary view. Economy and Society, 46(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2017.1308059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2016, 12 October). Neoliberalism is creating loneliness: That’s what’s wrenching society apart. Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadephia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. W. (1983). Untimely meditations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostry, J. D., Loungani, P. & Furceri, D. (2016). Neoliberalism: Oversold. Finance & Development, 53(2), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, L. & Hay, J. (2008). Makeover television, governmentality and the good citizen. Continuum, 22(4), 471–484. doi: 10.1080/10304310801982930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1988). Are freedom and liberty twins? Political Theory, 16(4), 523–552. doi: 10.1177/0090591788016004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. (1978). Towards a democratic socialism. New Left Review, I(109), 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, F. (1950). Stress and the general adaptation syndrome. British Medical Journal, 2(4670), 104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4670.104-a
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1992). Towards a critical sociology of freedom: An inaugural lecture by Professor Nikolas Rose. London: 5 May, Goldsmiths College, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–356. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999a). Inventiveness in politics. Economy and Society, 28(3), 467–493. doi: 10.1080/03085149900000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1999b). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2000). Community, citizenship, and the Third Way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1395–1411. doi: 10.1177/00027640021955955
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. doi: 10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R. (2017). ‘I, the people’: A deflationary interpretation of populism, Trump and the United States constitution. Economy and Society, 46(1), 20–42. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2017.1302060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge : Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. F. (2017). Populisms and liberal democracy – business as usual? Economy and Society, 46(1), 43–59. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2017.1307652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias, S. (2005). Foucault on freedom and capabilities. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(4), 65–85. doi: 10.1177/0263276405053721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (1996). ‘Despotism’ and ethical liberal governance. Economy and Society, 25(3), 357–372. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venugopal, R. (2015). Neoliberalism as concept. Economy and Society, 44(2), 165–187. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2015.1013356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M., Jones, R., Howell, R., Lilley, R. & Pykett, J. (2014). Nudging all over the world. ESRC Report. Swindon and Edinburgh: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. (2015). Unknotting the heart: Unemployment and therapeutic governance in China. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2017a). Cultivating the therapeutic self in China. Medical Anthropology, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. (2017b). The rise of therapeutic governing in postsocialist China. Medical Anthropology, 36(1), 6–18. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2015.1117079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar