Insurance and the temporality of climate ethics: Accounting for climate change in US flood insurance

References

• Alpert, B. (2013, September 25). Rallies planned Saturday in nine states to protest flood insurance premium hikes. The Times-Picayune.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. & Simon, J. (2002). Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. & O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 211–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsma, E. (2016). Geographers versus managers: Expert influence on the construction of values underlying flood insurance in the United States. Environmental Values, 25(6), 687–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2001). Governing climate change: The politics of risk society? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 430–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2007). An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(7-8), 139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checker, M. (2017). Stop FEMA Now: Social media, activism and the sacrificed citizen. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 79(February), 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. W. (2018, January 7). In New York, drawing flood maps is a ‘game of inches’. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. (2014). Neoliberalism and natural disaster: Insurance as a political technology of catastrophe. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(3), 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. & Lakoff, A. (2008). Distributed preparedness: The spatial logic of domestic security in the United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(1), 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (1999). Risk, calculable and incalculable. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 131–159). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of City Planning. (2014). Coastal climate resiliency: Retrofitting buildings for flood risk. New York City: Department of City Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (2017). Who pays for the next wave: The American welfare state and responsibility for flood risk. Politics & Society, 45(3), 415–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (2019). ‘Scarier than another storm’: Values at risk in the mapping and insuring of US floodplains. British Journal of Sociology, 70(3), 1067–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. & Rush, E. (2017, June). Stormy waters: The fight over New York City’s flood maps. Harper’s Monthly.
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, F. (1991). Insurance and risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 197–210). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2016, October 17). Mayor De Blasio and FEMA announce plan to revise NYC's flood maps [News release].
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, E. (2016). Claiming futures. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(S1), 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. & Healy, K. (2013). Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, 559–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2003). The rise of risk. In R. V. Ericson & A. Doyle (Eds.), Risk and morality (pp. 48–86). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, I. (Forthcoming). Hazardous simulations: Constructing estimates of climate risk in US coastal insurance markets. Economy and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability induction and statistical inference. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2004). Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction. Economy and Society, 33(3), 277–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimer, C. (2003). Insurers as moral actors. In R. V. Ericson & A. Doyle (Eds.), Risk and morality (pp. 284–316). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E. & Freeman, M. (2008). The organization of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. (2013). Jack, Jill, and Jane in a perfect moral storm. Philosophy and Public Issues, 3(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. (2015). Catastrophic fixes: Cyclical devaluation and accumulation through climate change impacts. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2503–2521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. O. (2013). The National Flood Insurance Program: Status and remaining issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, S. G. & Kunreuther, H. C. (2014). Troubled waters: The National Flood Insurance Program in historical perspective. Journal of Policy History, 26(3), 327–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslov, L. (2019). How maps make time: Temporal conflicts of life in the flood zone. City, 23(4-5), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, K. & Demeritt, D. (2015). Limits of insurance as risk governance: Market failures and disaster politics in German and British private flood insurance. Working Paper: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, A. & Klinenberg, E. (2010). Of risk and pork: Urban security and the politics of objectivity. Theory and Society, 39(September), 503–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S. N., Landström, C. & Whatmore, S. J. (2011). Imagining flood futures: Risk assessment and management in practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369, 1784–1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, T. & Liukko, J. (2015). Producing solidarity, inequality, and exclusion through insurance. Res Publica, 21(May), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mayor’s Office of Recovery and Resiliency. (2015). Appeal of FEMA’s preliminary flood insurance rate maps for New York City. New York City Office of the Mayor.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt is their product. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, D. A. (2004). When all else fails: Government as the ultimate risk manager. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, T. (2016). Burning anticipation: Wildfire, risk mitigation and simulation modelling in Victoria. Australia. Environment and Planning A, 48(10), 2026–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• P.L. 112-141. (2012). Flood Insurance Reform and Modernization Act. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. & Demeritt, D. (2012). Flood-risk management, mapping, and planning: The institutional politics of decision support in England. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2359–2378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J. L. (2011). The inquisition of climate science. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramey, C. (2015, August 18). New York disputes FEMA on flood risk. Wall Street Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Reith, G. (2004). Uncertain times: The notion of ‘risk’ and the development of modernity. Time & Society, 13(2-3), 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 385–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayre, N. F. (2010). Climate change, scale, and devaluation: The challenge of our built environment. Washington and Lee journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment, 1, 93–105.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, A. (2013, December 6). How well did FEMA’s maps predict Sandy’s flooding. ProPublica.
   Google Scholar
• Technical Mapping Advisory Council. (2016). Future conditions risk assessment and modeling. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate. (2011). Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearing: Reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program. 112th Cong., 1st sess., 9 June and 23 June. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Senate. (2012). The Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Subcommittee on Economic Policy. Hearing: The National Flood Insurance Program: The need for long-term reauthorization and reform. 112th Cong., 2nd sess., 9 May. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, H. & Cook, J. (2011). Climate change denial: Heads in the sand. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. (2011). Making climate change governable: The case of the UK climate change risk assessment and adaptation planning. Science and Public Policy, 38(4), 279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S. (2013). Performative vulnerability: Climate change adaptation policies and financing in Kiribati. Environment and Planning A, 45(11), 2717–2733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinkle, J. & Pielke Jr., R. (2017). The truthiness about hurricane catastrophe models. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(4), 547–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiderman, A. (2015). Spaces of uncertainty: Governing urban environmental hazards. In L. Samimian-Darash & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Modes of uncertainty (pp. 182–200). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeiderman, A. (2016). Prognosis past: The temporal politics of disaster in Colombia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(S1), 163–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar