A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement

References

• Stank , TP , Keller , SB and Daugherty , PJ . 2001 . Supply chain collaboration and logistics service performance . Journal of Business Logistics , 22 ( 1 ) : 29 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Rushton A Oxley J Croucher P 2000 The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management (2nd Edn) London The Institute of Logistics and Transport, Kogan Page
   Google Scholar
• McKendrick , DG and Carroll , GR . 2001 . On the genesis of organizational forms: evidence from the market for disk arrays . Organization Science , 12 ( 6 ) : 661 – 682 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London Metal Exchange website 2002 http://www.lme.co.uk/about_lme/history. html
   Google Scholar
• Baltic Exchange website 2002 http://www.balticexchange.com/content/About.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Covisint website 2002 http://www.covisint.com/about/history/
   Google Scholar
• Mentzer , JT , Dewitt , W , Keebler , JS , Min , S , Nix , NW , Smith , CD and Zacharia , ZG . 2001 . Defining supply chain management . Journal of Business Logistics , 22 ( 2 ) : 1 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Lalonde , BJ and Masters , JM . 1994 . Emerging logistics strategies: blueprints for the next century . International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 24 ( 7 ) : 35 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Lambert DM Stock JR Ellram LM 1998 Fundamentals of Logistics Management Boston MA McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Christopher M 1992 Logistics and Supply Chain Management London Pitman
   Google Scholar
• Croom , S , Romano , P and Giannakis , M . 2000 . Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review . European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , 6 : 67 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Lummus , RR and Vokurka , RJ . 1999 . Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines . Industrial Management and Data Systems , 99 ( 1 ) : 11 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croom , S , Romano , P and Giannakis , M . 2000 . Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review . European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , 6 : 67 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD . 1999 . Technical note: the fourth generation port . UNCTAD Ports Newsletter , 19 : 9 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD 1976 Port Performance Indicators Geneva UNCTAD
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD 1983 Manual on a Uniform System of Port Statistics and Performance Indicators Geneva UNCTAD
   Google Scholar
• De Monie G 1987 Measuring and Evaluating Port Performance and Productivity Monograph no. 6 on Port Management Geneva UNCTAD
   Google Scholar
• ISL 1990 General Aspects of Port Management: Port Management Text Book Series Vol. 1 Bremen Germany Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics (ISL)
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo L Nombela G 1999 Privatisation and Regulation of the Seaport Industry Policy Research Working Paper 2181 Washington DC The World Bank
   Google Scholar
• Port of Rotterdam 2002 Port Statistics 2002 http://www.portofrotterdam.com/Images/16_52849.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ISEMAR Institut Supérieur d’Economie Maritime 2002 http://www.isemar.asso.fr/
   Google Scholar
• Eno Transportation Foundation 1999 Toward improved intermodal freight transport between Europe and the United States Report of the 3rd Eno Transportation Foundation Policy Forum New York USA November. Sponsored by European Commission D-G VII and US Dept of Transportation Office of Intermodalism and Federal Highway Administration
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie DR North MC Smith DS 1989 Intermodal Transportation: The Whole Story Omaha NE Simmons-Boardman
   Google Scholar
• Department Of The Environment, Transport And The Regions 2000 Modern Ports, a UK Policy London DETR
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD 1983 Manual on a Uniform System of Port Statistics and Performance Indicators Geneva UNCTAD
   Google Scholar
• Frankel , EG . 1991 . Port performance and productivity measurement . Ports and Harbours , 36 ( 8 ) : 11 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Bendall , H and Stent , A . 1987 . On measuring cargo handling productivity . Maritime Policy & Management , 14 ( 4 ) : 337 – 343 .
   Google Scholar
• Talley , W . 1998 . Optimum throughput and performance evaluation of marine terminals . Maritime Policy & Management , 10 ( 13 ) : 57 – 66 .
   Google Scholar
• Kim , M and Sachish , A . 1986 . The structure of production, technical change and productivity in ports . Journal of Industrial Economics , 35 ( 2 ) : 209 – 223 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neuville , R and Tsunokawa , K . 1981 . Productivity and returns of scale of container port . Maritime Policy & Management , 8 ( 2 ) : 121 – 129 .
   Google Scholar
• Fare R Grosskopf S Lovell CAK 1994 Production Frontiers London Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Liu , Z and Zhuang , J . 1998 . Evaluating partial reforms in the Chinese state industrial sector: a stochastic frontier cost function approach . Review of Applied Economics , 12 ( 1 ) : 9 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Song DK Cullinane K Roe MS 2001 The Productive Efficiency of Container Terminals: An Application to Korea and the UK Aldershot Ashgate
   Google Scholar
• Roll , Y and Hayuth , Y . 1993 . Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) . Maritime Policy & Management , 20 ( 2 ) : 153 – 161 .
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom , T , Coeck , C and Van Den Broeck , J . 2000 . Measuring and explaining the relative efficiency of container terminals by means of Bayesian stochastic frontier models . International Journal of Maritime Economics , 2 ( 2 ) : 83 – 106 .
   Google Scholar
• Tongzon , JL . 1995 . Determinants of port performance and efficiency . Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , 29A ( 3 ) : 245 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine VF Gray R 2001 The measurement of port efficiency using data envelopment analysis World Conference on Transport Research Seoul South Korea July
   Google Scholar
• Estache A Gonzales M Trujillo L 2002 Efficiency Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico World Bank Washington http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/regulation/pdfs/portreform_mexico. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane , K , Song , DW and Gray , R . 2002 . A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures . Transportation Research , 36 ( A ) : 743 – 762 .
   Google Scholar
• Coto-Millán , P , Banos-Pino , J and Rodriguez-Álvarez , A . 2000 . Economic efficiency in Spanish ports: some empirical evidence . Maritime Policy & Management , 27 ( 2 ) : 169 – 174 .
   Google Scholar
• Léonard P 1990 Les Indicateurs de la Politique Maritime Caen France Ed. Paradigme
   Google Scholar
• Croom , S , Romano , P and Giannakis , M . 2000 . Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review . European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , 6 : 67 – 83 .
   Google Scholar
• Harding A Juhel MH 1997 Ports, cities and the challenge of global logistics 6th International Conference of Cities and Ports Montevideo Uruguay November
   Google Scholar
• Rushton A Oxley J Croucher P 2000 The Handbook of Logistics and Distribution Management (2nd Edn) London The Institute of Logistics and Transport, Kogan Page
   Google Scholar
• Haralambides , H , Cariou , P and Benacchio , M . 2002 . Costs, benefits and pricing of dedicated container terminals . International Journal of Maritime Economics , 4 ( 1 ) : 21 – 34 .
   Google Scholar
• Alderton PM 1999 Port Management and Operations London LLP
   Google Scholar
• Caude G 1998 Organisation of ports in the world. Seminar on Port Operation and Management Institute Portuaire du Havre (IPER) Le Havre France October
   Google Scholar
• Fleming , DK and Baird , AJ . 1999 . Some reflections on port competition in the United States and Europe . Maritime Policy & Management , 26 ( 4 ) : 383 – 394 .
   Google Scholar
• Carter , JR and Ferrin , BG . 1995 . The impact of transportation costs on supply chain management . Journal of Business Logistics , 16 ( 1 ) : 189 – 212 .
   Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y Klaus P 1997 Logistics at large: jumping the barriers of the logistics function Council of Logistics Management Conference Chicago USA September
   Google Scholar
• Christopher , M and Towell , DR . 2000 . Supply chain migration from lean and functional to agile and customised . Supply Chain Management , 5 ( 4 ) : 206 – 213 .
   Google Scholar
• Paixao , AC and Marlow , PB . 2003 . Fourth generation ports—a question of agility? . International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 33 ( 4 ) : 355 – 376 .
   Google Scholar
• Muller G 1999 Intermodal Freight Transportation (4th edn) Greenbelt MD Intermodal Association of North America/Washington, DC: Eno Transportation Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Hayuth Y 1987 Intermodality: Concept and Practice London Lloyds of London Press
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD 1995 Facing the Challenge of Integrated Transport Services New York United Nations
   Google Scholar
• Haralambides , H , Cariou , P and Benacchio , M . 2002 . Costs, benefits and pricing of dedicated container terminals . International Journal of Maritime Economics , 4 ( 1 ) : 21 – 34 .
   Google Scholar
• Morash , EA and Clinton , SR . 1997 . The role of transportation capabilities in international supply chain management . Transportation Journal , 36 ( 3 ) : 5 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett S 2001 Deregulation, competitive pressures and the emergence of intermodalism IAME Conference Hong Kong July
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom , T and Winkelmans , W . 2001 . Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? . Maritime Policy & Management , 28 ( 1 ) : 71 – 89 .
   Google Scholar
• Thorby C 2001 Value-added carriers Containerisation International April, 52–55
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista , P and Morvillo , A . 1999 . Alliances in liner shipping: an instrument to gain operational efficiency or supply chain integration? . International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications , 2 ( 1 ) : 21 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , JC and Jackson , GC . 2000 . Conflict, power, and evolution in the intermodal transportation industry's channel of distribution . Transportation Journal , 38 ( 3 ) : 5 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Fleming , DK and Baird , AJ . 1999 . Some reflections on port competition in the United States and Europe . Maritime Policy & Management , 26 ( 4 ) : 383 – 394 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , R . 2002 . Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm . Maritime Policy & Management , 29 ( 3 ) : 241 – 255 .
   Google Scholar
• Ibid.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney AT 1985 Measuring and Improving Productivity in Physical Distribution Chicago IL National Council of Physical Distribution Management
   Google Scholar
• Clarke , LR and Gourdin , KN . 1991 . Measuring the efficiency of the logistics process . Journal of Business Logistics , 12 ( 2 ) : 17 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• European Logistics Association 1999 Logistics Performance Measures: Requirements and Measuring Methods CEN/ELA Report BT N 5976 Brussels Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore , MJ and Miller , T . 1998 . A framework for integrating activity-based costing and the balanced scorecard into the logistics strategy development and monitoring process . Journal of Business Logistics , 19 ( 2 ) : 131 – 154 .
   Google Scholar
• Christopher M 1998 Logistics and Supply Chain Management London Pitman
   Google Scholar
• Bowersox DJ Closs DJ 1996 Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process New York McGraw Hill
   Google Scholar
• Lambert DM Stock JR Ellram LM 1998 Fundamentals of Logistics Management Boston MA McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Keebler JS Manrodt KB Dutshe DA Ledyard DM 1999 Keeping Score: Measuring the Business Value of Logistics in the Supply Chain Chicago IL University of Tennessee and the Council of Logistics Management
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS Norton DP 1992 The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance The Harvard Business Review January/February 71 79
   Google Scholar
• Supply-Chain Council 2002 Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model Overview Version 5.0 http://www.supplychain.org/slides/SCOR5.0OverviewBooklet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg , S . 2000 . A systems perspective on supply chain measurements . International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 30 ( 10 ) : 847 – 868 .
   Google Scholar
• Fleming , DK and Baird , AJ . 1999 . Some reflections on port competition in the United States and Europe . Maritime Policy & Management , 26 ( 4 ) : 383 – 394 .
   Google Scholar
• Performance Management Group (PMC) 2002 http://www.pmcbenchmarking.com
   Google Scholar
• Caplice , C and Shefi , Y . 1995 . A review and evaluation of logistics performance measurement systems . International Journal of Logistics Management , 6 ( 1 ) : 61 – 74 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , R . 1976 . Modelling the port as an operational system: a perspective for research . Economic Geography , 52 ( 1 ) : 71 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman , AC and Lenze , D . 1988 . Port facilities and the international coal market . Transportation Research A , 22 ( 2 ) : 137 – 144 .
   Google Scholar
• Evans J Marlow PB 1990 Quantitative Methods in Maritime Economics London Fairplay
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z 1999 Port System Analysis unpublished MSc Dissertation Malmö Sweden World Maritime University
   Google Scholar
• Westbrook , R . 1995 . Action research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations . International Journal of Operations & Production Management , 15 ( 12 ) : 6 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näsland , D . 2002 . Logistics needs qualitative research—especially action research . International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 32 ( 5 ) : 321 – 338 .
   Google Scholar
• Argyris C Putnam R Smith DM 1985 Action Science Oxford Jossey-Bass
   Google Scholar
• Minor changes in terminology used in figure 3 and the appendix for the different channels were made in the light of responses to the research. The revised versions are shown in this paper
   Google Scholar