Entry barriers in seaports

References and notes

• An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2006 Annual Conference of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Melbourne, , Australia
   Google Scholar
• Olivier , D . 2005 . Private entry and emerging partnerships in container terminal operations: evidence from Asia . Maritime Economics and Logistics , 7 ( 2 ) : 87 – 115 .
   Google Scholar
• De Langen , PW and Pallis , AA . 2006 . The effects of intra-port competition . International Journal of Transport Economics , 33 ( 1 ) : 69 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski , PA . 1995 . What do we know about entry? . International Journal Industrial Organisation , 13 ( 4 ) : 421 – 440 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2006 . This relevance is also implied in: Goss, R., 2006, Competition is key to wellbeing of ports . Lloyd's List , 27 November
   Google Scholar
• Heaver , T . 2006 . “ The evolution and challenges of port economics ” . In Port Economics , Edited by: Cullinane , K and Talley , WK . 11 – 42 . Oxford, , UK : Elsevier .
   Google Scholar
• McAfee , RP , Mialon , HM and Williams , MA . 2000 . What is a barrier to Entry? . American Economy Review , 94 ( 2 ) : 461 – 465 . See, for example:
   Google Scholar
• Carlton , D . 2004 . “ Why barriers to entry are barriers to understanding ” . In NBER Working Paper No 10577 , New York, , USA : National Bureau of Economic Research .
   Google Scholar
• Bain , JS . 1956 . Barriers to New Competition , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stigler , GJ . 1968 . The Organisation of Industry , Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Carlton , D and Perloff , J . 1994 . Modern Industrial Organization , 110 New York, , USA : Harper Collins College Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, n.d. Port Reform Tool Kit , Washington, DC, , USA : World Bank .
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk , HC . 2005 . Port reform and concessioning in developing countries . Maritime Economics and Logistics , 7 ( 2 ) : 141 – 155 .
   Google Scholar
• This is the case when the market is not is not at least twice as large as the Minimum Efficient Scale for providing a port service. Examples of natural monopolies in ports include towage and terminal services ,
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom , TE and Rodrigue , JP . 2005 . Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development . Maritime Policy and Management , 32 ( 3 ) : 297 – 313 .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , R . 2003 . Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm . Maritime Policy and Management , 29 ( 3 ) : 241 – 255 .
   Google Scholar
• Defined as a long-term arrangement among distinct but related firms in order to gain or sustain a competitive advantage vis-à-vis their competitors—See: Jarillo, J. C., 1988, On strategic networks . Strategic Management Journal , 9 ( 1 ) 31 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Djankov , S , Porta , R , Shleifer , A and Lopez De Silanes , F . 2001 . The regulation of entry . World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series Report No 661 , Retrieved March 2007, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org
   Google Scholar
• Brooks , MR and Cullinane , K , eds. 2001 . “ For example, see the analysis of the Greek port reform by Pallis, A. A., 2007, Port governance in Greece ” . In Issues on Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance , 491 – 508 . London : Elsevier .
   Google Scholar
• Stigler , GJ . 1971 . The theory of economic regulation . Bell Journal of Economics , 2 ( 1 ) : 3 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Slack , B and Fremont , A . 2005 . Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global . Transport Reviews , 25 ( 1 ) : 117 – 130 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol , W , Panzar , J and Willig , R . 1982 . Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , New York, , USA : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom , TE . 2004 . Container shipping and ports: An overview . Review of Network Economics , 3 ( 2 ) : 86 – 106 .
   Google Scholar
• Foster , L , Haltiwanger , J and Krizan , CJ . 2001 . “ Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence ” . In New Developments in Productivity Analysis , Edited by: Hulten , CR , Dean , ER and Harper , MJ . 303 – 353 . Chicago : University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN SEAPORT ORGANISATION (ESPO) . 2004 . Impact assessment of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Market Access to Port Services , Mimeo, Brussels : ESPO .
   Google Scholar
• ECORYS and Trademco . 2005 . Complementary Economic Evaluation study on the Commission proposal for a Directive on market access to port services, Final Report for the European Commission -DG TREN , Rotterdam and Athens : ECORYS and Trademco .
   Google Scholar
• 2004 . “ The three cases are Rotterdam, Durban, and Lower Mississippi—see: De Langen, P. W. ” . In The Performance of Seaport Clusters , Rotterdam: Erasmus : Research Institute of Management . PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Pallis , AA and Vaggelas , GK . 2005 . Port competitiveness and the EU ‘port services’ directive: The Case of Greek Ports . Maritime Economics and Logistics , 7 ( 2 ) : 116 – 140 .
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom , T.E . 2002 . Consolidation and contestability in the European cotainer handling industry . Maritime Policy and Management , 29 ( 3 ) : 257 – 269 . See
   Google Scholar
• An imbalance of port capacity and demand within a port will influence the level of rivalry in port. Excess capacity causes rivals to compete aggressively for market share. Sometimes this situation can lead to destructive pricing. Similarly, the inability within a port to generate sufficient traffic will increase rivalry for available business. There is therefore a need to explore the types of traffic for which the port might have a comparative advantage
   Google Scholar
• The number of surveys is sufficient to sketch the broader picture, but insufficient for formal statistical analysis. This deficiency is mainly to the result of the fact that there are only 20 Canadian ports with a CPA
   Google Scholar
• Of course, port authorities need to ensure relatively long-term contracts for such investments in order to reduce the risk associated with long-term investments ,
   Google Scholar
• Chlomoudis , CI and Pallis , AA . 2004 . “ Port governance and the smart port authority: key issues for the reinforcement of quality services in European ports ” . In Proceedings of the 10th Word Conference on Transport Research Istanbul, , Turkey June 2004, CD-Rom format
   Google Scholar
• De langen , PW . 2003 . “ The Port Authority as Cluster Manager ” . In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Maritime Transport and Maritime History , 67 – 84 . Barcelona, , Spain : Technical University of Catalonia .
   Google Scholar
• COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION . 2004 . “ Proposal for a Directive on market access to port services ” . In Com (2004)654, final , Brussels : European Commission .
   Google Scholar
• The authors wish to thank Richard Goss for bringing this point to their attention
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom , TE . 2007 . “ Concession agreements as port governance tools ” . In Issues on Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance , Edited by: Brooks , MR and Cullinane , K . 491 – 508 . London : Elsevier .
   Google Scholar