Increased collaborative relationships in international logistics: Canadian and other national and corporate examples

References

• Albanese, A. 2012. “Opening Address to the Australian Logistics Council Forum 2012.” Sydney, March 29. Accessed April 14. http://www.minister.infrastructure.gov.au/aa/speeches/2012/AS15_2012.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Almotairi, B., J. Flodén, G. Stefansson, and J. Woxenius. 2011. “Information Flows Supporting Hinterland Transportation by Rail: Applications in Sweden.” Research in Transportation Economics 33 (1): 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• American Shipper Daily. 2001. “APL’s Jacobs Calls for Wider, Long-term Logistics Contracts.” AmericanShipper.com, March 8.
   Google Scholar
• American Shipper Daily. 2002. “OOCL’s Tung Warns Against ‘Consolidation and Commoditization.” American Shipper.com, March 8.
   Google Scholar
• CN’s Claude Mongeau says Market-Based Innovation and Supply Chain Collaboration are Key to Strengthening Global Trade Through Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway. 2010. CN, News Release. October 29. Accessed November 17, 2012. http://www.cn.ca/en/media-news-market-based-innovation-20101029.htm
   Google Scholar
• CSSTC (Committee on the State of Science and Technology in Canada) 2006. The State of Science & Technology in Canada. Ottawa, ON: The Council of Canadian Academies, 213.
   Google Scholar
• CP and DP World Vancouver Sign Productivity and Performance Agreement. 2010. Canadian Pacific, News Release. June 23. Accessed November 17, 2012. http://www.cpr.ca/en/news-and-media/news/Pages/CP-and-DP-World-Vancouver.aspx
   Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., and D. De Bruyne. 2011. “Port Activities, Hinterland Congestion, and Optimal Government Policies: The Role of Vertical Integration in Logistic Operations.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 45 (2): 247–275.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2009. “Assuring Hinterland Access: The Role of Port Authorities.” In Port Competition and Hinterland Connections, 109–128. Paris: OECD, International Transport Forum, Round Table, 143
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, P., T. D. Heaver, and A. Morvillo. 2001. “Liner shipping Strategies for Supply Chain Management.” A paper presented at the World Conference on transport research, Seoul, July.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel. 2009. Expert Panel on Business Innovation. Innovation and Business Strategy: Why Canada Falls Short. Ottawa, ON: The Council of Canadian Academies, 268.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Maritime Commission. 2010. Vessel Capacity and Equipment Availability Report Recommends Collaborative Approaches to Develop Supply Chain Reliability Solutions. FMC NR 10–24, December 8. http://www.fmc.gov/vessel_capacity_equipment_availability_report_recommends_collaborative_approaches_develop_supply_chain_reliability_solutions/
   Google Scholar
• Franc, P., and M. Van der Horst. 2010. “Understanding Hinterland Service Integration by Shipping Lines and Terminal Operators: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (4): 557–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fremont, A. 2010. “Empirical Evidence for Integration and Disintegration of Maritime Shipping, Ports and Logistics Activities.” Integration and competition between transport and logistics businesses, OECD, International Transport Forum, Round Table 146, 33–65.
   Google Scholar
• Global Maritime Logistics Council. 2009. Seaport Cluster Research Programme 2007–2011 Preliminary Findings June 2009. New York: Global Institute of Logistics.
   Google Scholar
• Heaver, T. D. 1995. “The Implications of Increased Competition for Port Policy and Management.” Journal of Maritime Policy and Management 22 (2): 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Heaver, T. D. 2002. “The Evolving Roles of Shipping Lines in International Logistics.” International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (3): 210–230.
   Google Scholar
• Heaver, T. D. 2010. “The Response of Liner Shipping Companies to the Evolution of Global Supply Chain Management.” In Maritime Economics and Business, 2nd ed., edited by C. Grammenos, 457–477. London: Lloyds of London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heaver, T. D. 2011. “Coordination in Multi-Actor Logistics Operations: Challenges at the Port Interface.” In Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors, edited by P. Hall, R. McCalla, C. Comtois and B. Slack, 155–170. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, D. 2011. “APEC TFAP and Supply Chain Connectivity Framework.” Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Seoul, October 5. Accessed April 14, 2012. http://www.unescap.org/tid/projects/tfforum11_c2_hew.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E. 2008. “The Relationship Between Seaports and the Intermodal Hinterland in Light of Global Supply Chains.” Joint Transport Research Centre, OECD, Discussion Paper 2008–10. Antwerp: ITTMA.
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A., T. E. Notteboom, and P. W. De Langen. 2008. “Concession Agreements and Market Entry in the Container Terminal Industry.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 10 (3): 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M. 2002. “Economic Organization of Intermodal Transport.” Transport Reviews 22 (4): 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M. 2006. “Maritime Logistics and Global Supply Chains: Towards a Research Agenda.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M., and D.-W. Song. 2008. “Evaluating the Integration of Seaport Container Terminals in Supply Chains.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38 (7): 562–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port of Los Angeles. 2009. “US West Coast Ports/western Rails Announce First-ever Collaboration.” Accessed November 18, 2011. http://www.portoflosangeles.org/newsroom/2009_releases/news_111209_chinatrip.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Port Metro Vancouver and CN Enter into Supply Chain Collaboration Agreement to Further Improve Gateway Competitiveness. 2010. Port Metro Vancouver, News Release. May 31. Accessed November 2011. http://www.portmetrovancouver.com/en/about/news/10-05-31/Port_Metro_Vancouver_and_CN_enter_into_supply_chain_collaboration_agreement_to_further_improve_gateway_competitiveness.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Port Technology International. 2011. “Maersk Line CEO Unveils New Manifesto at TOC Europe 2011.” Accessed November 18, 2011. http://www.porttechnology.org/news/maersk_line_ceo_unveils_new_manifesto_at_toc_europe_2011/
   Google Scholar
• Rail Freight Service Review Panel. 2011. Rail Freight Service Review Panel, Final Report. Ottawa, ON: Transport Canada, TP 15042.
   Google Scholar
• Roath, A. S., J. M. Whipple, and S. E. Fawcett. 2010. “Exploring a Governance Theory of Supply Chain Management: Barriers and Facilitators to Integration.” Journal of Business Logistics 31 (1): 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrıguez-Alvarez, A., B. Tovar, and A. Wall. 2011. “The Effect of Demand Uncertainty on Port Terminal Costs.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 45 (2): 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1961. The Economic Theory of Economic Development. Translated by R. Opie. New York: Oxford University Press. (English translation of second edition, 1926, of Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, first published 1934.)
   Google Scholar
• Shipping Position Online. 2011. “APL Imposes No-show Fees, Joins Maersk Line.” Accessed November 18, 2011. http://shippingposition.com/article/apl-imposes-no-show-fees-joins-maersk-line
   Google Scholar
• Song, D.-W., and P. M. Panayides. 2008. “Global Supply Chain and Port/Terminal: Integration and Competitiveness.” Maritime Policy & Management 35 (1): 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Stank, T. P., S. B. Keller, and P. J. Daugherty. 2001. “Supply Chain Collaboration and Logistics Service Performance.” Journal of Business Logistics 22 (1): 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• TIGER. 2012. Transit via Innovative Gateway Concepts Solving European – Intermodal Rail Needs. Accessed December 2, 2013. http://www.tigerproject.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Traill, A. 2009. “Risk Management in International Transport and Logistics.” Accessed January 12, 2012. www.shippersvoice.com/2009/04/27/risk-management-in-international-transport-and-logistics/
   Google Scholar
• UNCTADSTAT. 2012. ” Value Growth Rates of Merchandise Exports and Imports, Annual 1950–2010.” Accessed November 17, 2012. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=102
   Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, M. R., and P. W. De Langen. 2008. “Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 10 (1/2): 108–129.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, M. R., and L. M. Van de Lugt. 2011. “Coordination Mechanisms in Improving Hinterland Accessibility: Empirical Analysis in the Port of Rotterdam.” Maritime Policy & Management 38 (4): 415–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walz, M. 2012, Trends to Watch in 2012, WT100 Article Spotlights, January 3. Accessed April 19. http://www.worldtradewt100.com/articles/88038-trends-to-watch-in-2012
   Google Scholar
• WESTAC (Western Transportation Advisory Council). 2010. Innovation in Transportation: Summary Report of Workshop held March 5 2010 (Vancouver). Vancouver, BC: WESTAC.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 2002. “The Theory of the Firm as Governance Structure: From Choice to Contract.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3): 171–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 2005. “The Economics of Governance.” (Richard T. Ely Lecture), American Economic Review 95 (2): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 2008. “Outsourcing: Transaction Cost Economics and Supply Chain Management.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 44 (2): 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E., and T. Ghani. 2011. “Transaction Cost Economics and Its Uses in Marketing.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 40 (1): 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. S. 2002. Trade Facilitation: A Development Perspective in the Asia Pacific Region, World Bank. Accessed April 14, 2012. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRES/Resources/20929_APEC_TF_Report_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar