Fuzzy empty containers excess estimation as an economic indicator—the case of the north Adriatic port system

References

• Barros, C. 2005. “Decomposing Growth in Portuguese Seaports: A Frontier Cost Approach.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 7: 297–315. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100140.
   Google Scholar
• Beskovnik, B., and E. Twrdy. 2010. “Planning Organization and Productivity Simulation Tool for Maritime Container Terminals.” Transport 25 (3): 293–299. doi:10.3846/transport.2010.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and Q. C. Zeng. 2010. “Designing Container Shipping Network under Changing Demand and Freight Rates.” Transport 25 (1): 46–57. doi:10.3846/transport.2010.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z.-J., and C.-L. Hwang. 1992. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chor, D., and K. Manova. 2012. “Off the Cliff and Back? Credit Conditions and International Trade during the Global Financial Crisis.” Journal of International Economics 87 (1): 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C.-C. 2007. “A Fuzzy MCDM Method for Solving Marine Transshipment Container Port Selection Problems.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 186 (1): 435–444. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, T.-Y., and G.-S. Liang. 2001. “Application of a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Shipping Company Performance Evaluation.” Maritime Policy & Management 28 (4): 375–392. doi:10.1080/03088830110049951.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang, T.-N., and J.-Y. Kung. 2006. “A New Algorithm for the Discrete Fuzzy Shortest Path Problem in a Network.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 174 (1): 660–668. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.04.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coto-Millan, P., J. Banso-Pino, and A. Rodriguez-Alvarez. 2000. “Economic Efficiency in Spanish Ports: Some Empirical Evidence.” Maritime Policy and Management 27 (2): 169–174. doi:10.1080/030888300286581.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K. P. B., and D. W. Song. 2003. “A Stochastic Frontier Model of the Productive Efficiency of Korean Container Terminals.” Applied Economics 35 (3). doi:10.1080/00036840210139355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K. P. B., and D. W. Song. 2006. “Estimating the Relative Efficiency of European Container Ports: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis.” Research in Transportation Economics 16. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(06)16005-9.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K. P. B., D. W. Song, and R. Gray. 2002. “A Stochastic Frontier Model of the Efficiency of Major Container Terminals in Asia: Accessing the Influence of Administrative and Ownership Structures.” Transportation Research Part A 36: 743–762.
   Google Scholar
• De Monie, G., J. P. Rodrigue, and T. Notteboom. 2011. “Economic Cycles in Maritime Shipping and Ports: The Path to the Crisis of 2008.” In Integrating Seaports and Trade Corridors, edited by P. V. Hall, B. McCalla, C. Comtois, and B. Slack, 13–30. Surrey, BC: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dereli, T., and G. S. Das. 2010. “Development of a Decision Support System for Solving Container Loading Problems.” Transport 25 (2): 138–147. doi:10.3846/transport.2010.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., M. Gonzalez, and L. Trujillo. 2002. “Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico.” World Development 30 (4): 545–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, M., J. Mangan, and C. Lalwani. 2012. “Comparing Port Performance: Western European versus Eastern Asian Ports.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 42 (5): 490–512. doi:10.1108/09600031211246537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenkel, M., E. M. Lis, and J.-C. Rülke. 2011. “Has the Economic Crisis of 2007-2009 Changed the Expectation Formation Process in the Euro Area?” Economic Modelling 28 (4): 1808–1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, M. M., and L. Trujillo. 2007. “Reforms and Infrastructure Efficiency in Spain’s Container Ports.” Transportation Research Part A 42 (2008): 243–257.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. R. M., P.-M. Lee, and H. C. Lucas. 2005. “A Resource-Based View of Competitive Advantage at the Port of Singapore.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14 (1): 69–86. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2004.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzemskiene, I. 2007. “The Evolution of Intermodal Transport Research and Its Development Issues.” Transport 22 (4): 296–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q. 2010. “Efficiency Analysis of Container Ports and Terminals.” Doctoral thesis, University College London (UCL).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 1995. “The Comparative Performance of Public and Private Enterprises: The Case of British Ports.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 29 (3): 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luka Koper d.d. 2010. “Statistical Data.” Accessed June 4. http://www.luka-kp.si.
   Google Scholar
• NAPA. 2010. “North Adriatic – Bridge Between Europe and Asia.” Accessed June 5. http://www.portsofnapa.com.
   Google Scholar
• NAPA. 2011. “Market Study on the Potential Cargo Capacity of the North Adriatic Ports System in the Container Sector DRAFT REPORT by MDS Transmodal.” Accessed September 15, 2012. http://www.its-napa.eu/attachments/article/7/.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. 2002. “Consolidation and Contestability in the European Container Handling Industry.” Maritime Policy and Management 29 (3): 257–269.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. 2004. “Container Shipping and Ports: An Overview.” Review of Network Economics 3: 86–106. doi:10.2202/1446-9022.1045.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., C. Coeck, and J. Broeck. 2000. “Measuring and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Container Terminals by Means of Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Models.” International Journal of Maritime Economics 2 (2): 83–106. doi:10.1057/ijme.2000.9.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and J.-P. Rodrigue. 2005. “Port Regionalization: Towards a New Phase in Port Development.” Maritime Policy and Management 32: 297–313. doi:10.1080/03088830500139885.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and P. Verhoeven. 2010. “The Awarding of Seaport Terminals to Private Operators: European Practices and Policy Implications.” European Transport – Trasporti Europei 45: 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and W. Winkelmans. 2001. “Reassessing Public Sector Involvement in European Seaports.” International Journal of Maritime Economics 3: 242–259. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ijme.9100008.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E. 2010. “Concentration and the Formation of Multi-Port Gateway Regions in the European Container Port System: An Update.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (4): 567–583. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onut, S., U. R. Tuzkaya, and E. Torun. 2011. “Selecting Container Port via a Fuzzy ANP-Based Approach: A Case Study in the Marmara Region, Turkey.” Turkey Transport Policy 18 (1): 182–193. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port Authority of Ravenna. 2010. “Statistical Data.” Accessed June 6. http://www.port.ravenna.it/.
   Google Scholar
• Port Authority of Rijeka. 2012. “Statistical Data.” Accessed September 25. http://www.portauthority.hr/.
   Google Scholar
• Port of Venice. 2010. “Statistical Data.” Accessed June 5. http://www.port.venice.it.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Alvarez, A., B. Tovar, and L. Trujillo. 2007. “Firm and Time Varying Technical and Allocative Efficiency: An Application to Port Cargo Handling Firms.” International Journal of Production Economics 109: 149–161. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.12.048.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., Y. Yan, and J. Liu. 2006. “Econometric Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Global Container Operators.” Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies: Sustainable Transportation, Hong Kong, December 9–11, 667–676.
   Google Scholar
• Tongzon, J., and W. Heng. 2005. “Port Privatization, Efficiency and Competitiveness: Some Empirical Evidence from Container Ports (Terminals).” Transportation Research Part A 39: 405–424.
   Google Scholar
• Trieste Marine Terminal. 2010. “Statistical Data.” Accessed September 15, 2012. http://www.trieste-marine-terminal.com/en.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, L., and B. Tovar. 2007. “The European Port Industry: An Analysis of its Economic Efficiency.” Maritime Economics and Logistics 9 (2): 148–171. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100177.
   Google Scholar
• Tuljak-Suban, D., and E. Twrdy. 2008. “Decision Support for Optimal Repositioning of Containers in a Feeder System.” Promet – Traffic & Transportation 20 (2): 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twrdy, E., and I. Trupac. 2011. “More Containers through New Transport Services – Case Study of the Port of Koper.” In Maritime Logistics in the Global Economy: Current Trends and Approaches, (Supply Chain, Logistics and Operations Management, Band 5), edited by T. Blecker, C. Jahn, and W. Kersten, 121–131. Lohmar: Josef Eul Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2010. Review of Maritime Transport. UNCTAD/RMT/2010. Geneva: UN Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliauskas, A. V., and J. Barysiene. 2008. “An Economic Evaluation Model of the Logistic System Based on Container Transportation.” Transport 23 (4): 311–315. doi:10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.311-315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R.-C., and H.-H. Fang. 2001. “Aggregate Production Planning with Multiple Objectives in a Fuzzy Environment.” European Journal of Operational Research 133 (3): 521–536. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00196-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegmans, B. W., A. V. D. Hoest, and T. E. Notteboom. 2008. “Port and Terminal Selection by Deep-Sea Container Operators.” Maritime Policy and Management 35 (6): 517–534. doi:10.1080/03088830802469329.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, G. T., M. Roe, and J. Dinwoodie. 2008. “Evaluating the Competitiveness of Container Ports in Korea and China.” Transportation Research Part A 42 (6): 910–921.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R., and G.-H. Tzeng. 2006. “A Soft Computing Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback.” Applied Mathematics and Computation 180 (1): 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar