Testing port choice models using physical and monetary data: a comparative case study for the Spanish container trades

References

• Anderson, C. M., J. J. Opaluch, and T. A. Grigalunas. 2009. “The Demand for Import Services at US Container Ports.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (2): 156–185. doi:10.1057/mel.2009.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collison, F. M. 1984. “Market Segments for Marine Liner Service.” Transportation Journal 24 (2): 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane, K., and M. Khanna. 1999. “Economies of Scale in Large Container Ships.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33 (2): 185–208.
   Google Scholar
• de Langen, P. 2004. “Governance in Seaport Clusters.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 (2): 141–156. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100100.
   Google Scholar
• Drewry, S. C. 2007. Container Forecaster Annual – 2007/08. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Alonso, L., and J. Sanchez-Soriano. 2009. “Port Selection from a Hinterland Perspective.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 11: 260–269. doi:10.1057/mel.2009.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, J., and D. Shneerson. 1987. Liner Shipping Economics. Chapman and Hall Ltd. ed. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd. London.
   Google Scholar
• Kou, Y., L. Liu, and M. Luo. 2014. “Lead–Lag Relationship between New-Building and Second-Hand Ship Prices.” Maritime Policy & Management 41 (4): 303–327. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.821209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lirn, T.-C., H. Thanopoulou, and A. K. C. Beresford. 2003. “Transhipment Port Selection and Decision-making Behaviour: Analysing the Taiwanese Case.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 6 (4): 229–244. doi:10.1080/13675560310001626990.
   Google Scholar
• Malchow, M., and A. Kanafani. 2001. “A Disaggregate Analysis of Factors Influencing Port Selection.” Maritime Policy & Management 28 (3): 265–277. doi:10.1080/03088830110060840.
   Google Scholar
• Malchow, M., and A. Kanafani. 2004. “A Disaggregate Analysis of Port Selection.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 40 (4): 317–337. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2003.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, A.-S., K. Lin, and G.-S. Liang. 2003. “Port Choice Behaviour from the Perspective of the Shipper.” Maritime Policy & Management 30 (2): 165–173. doi:10.1080/0308883032000069262.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E., A. A. Pallis, P. W. De Langen, and A. Papachristou. 2013. “Advances in Port Studies: The Contribution of 40 Years Maritime Policy & Management.” Maritime Policy & Management 40 (7): 636–653. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.851455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oum, T. H. 1989. “Alternative Demand Models and Their Elasticity Estimates.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 23 (2): 163–187. University of Bath and The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paixao Casaca, A. C., S. Carvalho, and M. Oliveira. 2010. Port Choice in the European Short Sea Shipping Market: The View of Point of Port Authorities. In: IAME 2010 Annual Conference Proceedings, Lisbon, July 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pallis, A. A., T. Vitsounis, and P. De Langen. 2010. “Port Economics, Policy and Management: Review of an Emerging Research Field.” Transport Reviews 30 (1): 115–161. doi:10.1080/01441640902843208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H. J. 1989. SeaTrade, Logistics and Transport. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, R. 2002. “Ports as Elements in Value-Driven Chain Systems: The New Paradigm.” Maritime Policy & Management 29 (3): 241–255. doi:10.1080/03088830210132623.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Rand McNally College. ed. Chicago: Rand McNally College.
   Google Scholar
• Song, D.-W., and K.-T. Yeo. 2004. “A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 6 (1): 34–52. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100096.
   Google Scholar
• Talley, W. K. 1990. “Optimal Containership Size.” Journal of Maritime Policy and Management 17 (3): 165–175. doi:10.1080/03088839000000024.
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, T. 1960. Supply and Demand of Water Transport: Studies in Cost and Revenue Structures of Ships, Ports, and Transport Buyers with Respect to Their Effects on Supply and Demand of Water Transport of Goods. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics, Business Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, P., H. Itoh, and M. Doi. 2003. “Shipper´S Port and Carrier Selection Behaviour in China: A Discrete Choice Analysis.” Maritime Economics and Logistics 5 (1): 23–39. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100062.
   Google Scholar
• UNITE (Unification of Accounts and Marginal Costs for Transport Efficiency). 2003. “Unification of Accounts and Marginal Costs for Transport Efficiency.” Project funded by the EC under the Fifth Framework Transport RTD. Framework Programme (1998-2002) in the thematic programme Competitive and Sustainable Growth. Leeds: UNITE (UNIfication of accounts and marginal costs for Transport Efficiency).
   Google Scholar
• Veldman, S. 2011. “On the Ongoing Increase of Containership Size.” In Advances in Maritime Logistics and Supply Chain Systems, edited by E. P. Chew, L. H. Lee, and L. C. Tang, 201–228. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Veldman, S., E. H. Bückmann, and R. N. Saitua. 2005. “River Depth and Container Port Market Shares: The Impact of Deepening the Scheldt River on the West European Container Hub-Port Market Shares.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (4): 336–355. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100142. Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Veldman, S., L. Garcia-Alonso, and J. Á. Vallejo-Pinto. 2011. “Determinants of Container Port Choice in Spain.” Maritime Policy & Management 38 (5): 509–522. doi:10.1080/03088839.2011.597450. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman, S., L. Garcia-Alonso, and J. Á. Vallejo-Pinto. 2013. “A Port Choice Model with Logit Models: A Case Study for the Spanish Container Trade.” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 5 (4/5): 373–389. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2013.055277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldman, S., and O. Gopkalo. 2010. “A Model on Port Basin Choice with Russian Container Trade.” In International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA) 2010: Integrated Transportation Logistics: From Low Cost to High Responsibility, 409–420. Chengdu: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmsmeier, G., and J. Hoffmann. 2008. “Liner Shipping Connectivity and Port Infrastructure as Determinants of Freight Rates in the Caribbean.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 10 (1–2): 130–151. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100195. Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Woo, J. K., and D. S.-H. Moon. 2014. “The Effects of Slow Steaming on the Environmental Performance in Liner Shipping.” Maritime Policy and Management 41 (2): 176–191. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.819131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, S.-H., S. J. Pettit, A. K. C. Beresford, and D.-W. Kwak. 2012. “Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s.” Transport Reviews 32 (3): 351–377. doi:10.1080/01441647.2012.660996. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, S.-H., S. J. Pettit, D.-W. Kwak, and A. K. C. Beresford. 2011. “Seaport Research: A Structured Literature Review on Methodological Issues since the 1980s.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 45 (7): 667–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., G. P. Ong, and A. T. H. Chin. 2014. “An Exploratory Study on the Effect of Trade Data Aggregation on International Freight Mode Choice.” Maritime Policy and Management 41 (3): 212–223. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.839516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, G.-T., A. K. Y. Ng, P. T.-W. Lee, and Z. Yang. 2014. “Modelling Port Choice in an Uncertain Environment.” Maritime Policy and Management 41 (3): 251–267. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.839515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., L. Fan, Z. Yanf, and K. Li. 2014. “Slow Stemaing of Liner Trade: Its Economic and Environmental Impacts.” Maritime Policy and Management 41 (2): 149–158. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.821210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. 2008. The Impact of Hinterland Access Conditions on Rivalry between Ports. Vancouver: Joint Transport Research Centre, OECD and ITF.
   Google Scholar