Can clusters be bi-polar? Exploring the case of the Piraeus port–maritime cluster

References

• Brett, V., and M. Roe. 2010. “The Potential for the Clustering of the Maritime Transport Sector in the Greater Dublin Region.” Maritime Policy & Management 37 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/03088830903461126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett, V. 2007. “The Potential for Clustering of the Maritime Transport Sector in the Greater Dublin Region.” PhD diss., National College of Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Colgan, C. S., and C. Baker. 2003. “A Framework for Assessing Cluster Development.” Economic Development Quarterly 17 (4): 352–366. doi:10.1177/0891242403256667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2002. Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning & Co-operative Advantage. Studies in International Business & the World Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2002. “Clustering and Performance: The Case of Maritime Clustering in the Netherlands.” Maritime Policy & Management 29 (3): 209–221. doi:10.1080/03088830210132605.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2003. “The Performance of SeaPort Clusters.” PhD diss., Erasmus University Rotterdam
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2004. “The Performance of Port Clusters.” Journal of International Logistics and Trade 2 (1): 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2008. “Analysing Port Clusters: Definition, Delimitation and Research Issues.” In Ports and Regional Economies: The Future of Port Clusters, edited by E. Musso and H. Ghiara. Milan: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W., and A. Pallis. 2007. “Entry Barriers in Seaports.” Maritime Policy & Management 34 (5): 427–440. doi:10.1080/03088830701585134.
   Google Scholar
• DG Mare. 2008. “The Role of Maritime Clusters to Enhance the Strength and Development of European Maritime Sectors, Report on Results.” Study done on behalf of the European Commission (DG MARE), Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, November 2008. Accessed December 11, 2013. http://ec.europa.eu/maritimeaffairs/documentation/studies/documents/report_results_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. “DG Enterprise and Industry Report, (2009): Innovation Clusters in Europe: A Statistical Analysis and Overview of Current Policy Support.” Accessed August 10, 2012. http://www.central2013.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Tools_Resources/Cluster.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FWC MARE/2012/06 – SC D1/2013/01 Final Report. Accessed October 28, 2014. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/maritimeforum/sites/maritimeforum/files/Maritime%20Clusters%20in%20MED-BS%20def_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Greek Shipping Cluster, Harvard Business School, Microeconomics of Competitiveness. Accessed December 18, 2012. http://www.isc.hbs.edu/pdf/Student_Projects/Greece_Shipping_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibbert, M., and W. Ruigrok. 2010. “The ‘‘What’’ and ‘‘How’’ of Case Study Rigor: Three Strategies Based on Published Work.” Organizational Research Methods 13 (4): 710–737. doi:10.1177/1094428109351319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haezendonck, E. 2001. Essays on Strategy Analysis for Seaports. Garant: Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. F., and J. K. Clasen. 2010. “The Economics Significance of Maritime Clusters.” Accessed August 2012. http://www.anishshipping.com/public/documenter/Engelsk%20side/2010/Danish_Shipping_2010%20%C5rsberetning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lord Sainsbury. 2008. “A Practical Guide to Cluster Development.” Accessed October 11 2013. http://www.caps.am/data.php/865.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, F., and A. Atherton. 2000. A Business View of Clustering: Lessons for Cluster Development Policies Foundation for SME Development. Durham: University of Durham.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, N., C. Woodsong, K. M. MaxQueen, G. Guest, and E. Namey. 2005. Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. Durham, NC: Family Health International.
   Google Scholar
• Maritime Cluster Analysis on the Central Baltic Region, SmartComp Research Report No 1, December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1920. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, C. 1999. General Guidelines for Conducting Interviews. Accessed February 9 2012. http://www.mapnp.org/library/evaluatn/intrview.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Local Economic and Employment Development: Business Clusters - Promoting Enterprise in Central and Eastern Europe. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Padmore, T., and H. Gibson. 1998. “Modeling Systems of Innovation, Part II A Framework for Industrial Cluster Analysis in Regions.” Research Policy 26: 625–641. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00038-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardali, A. 2012. The Port of Piraeus, Historical Transformation and Its Developmental Contribution. [In Greek.]. Athens: Stamoulis.
   Google Scholar
• Pardali, A., and M. Miliaraki. 2006. “Marinas as Poles for Sustainable Local Tourist Development.” Archive of Economic History XVIII: 10–126.
   Google Scholar
• Pardali, A. 2001. “Ports and Their Contribution to Regional Development: The Case of Piraeus.” 14th National Conference in Operations Research, Xanthi, Greece (in Greek). Accessed September 11 2012. http://www.iobe.gr/media/delepen/delepen11b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pardali, A. 2007. Port Economics and Policy, Competition and Competitiveness in Modern Port Industry, 465–489. [In Greek.]. Athens: Stamoulis.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, C., and H. Webers. 2006. “European Maritime Clusters: Solving the Definition and Data Puzzle.” In Dynamic European Maritime Clusters, edited by N. Wijnolst, 135–147. Delft: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 2000. “Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy.” Economic Development Quarterly 14 (1): 15–34. doi:10.1177/089124240001400105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, S. A. 2002. “Creating Smart Systems, A Guide to Cluster Strategies in Less Favoured Regions.” A Report to the European Union-Regional Innovation Strategies European. Accessed December 11, 2013. http://rtsinc.org/publications/pdf/less_favoured.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 1997. Research Methods for Business Students. 2nd ed. Essex: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E. 1999. “A Guide to the Qualitative Research Process: Evidence from a Small Firm Study.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 2 (2): 59–70. doi:10.1108/13522759910269973.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 1998. Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Toh, K. K. T., K. Welsh, and K. Hassal. 2010. “A Collaboration Service Model for a Global Port Cluster.” International Journal of Engineering Business Management 2 (1): 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD: Review of Maritime Transport 2013, UNCTAD/RMT/2013. http://unctad.org/en/publicationslibrary/rmt2013_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 1995. “Crossroads Style as Theory.” Organization Science 6 (1): 133–143. doi:10.1287/orsc.6.1.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, E.-J., and P. W. De Langen. 2006. “The Importance and Quality of Governance in the Chilean Wine Industry.” GeoJournal 65 (3): 177–197. doi:10.1007/s10708-006-0035-8.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and B. Slack. 2004. “Regional Governance of Port Development in China: A Case Study of Shanghai International Shipping Center.” Maritime Policy & Management 31 (4): 357–373. doi:10.1080/0308883042000304467.
   Google Scholar
• Winjnolst, N., I. J. Jennessen, and S. Sodal. 2003. European Maritime Clusters: Global Trends, Theoretical Framework, the Cases of Norway and the Netherlands, Policy Recommendations Dutch Maritime Network. San Gabriel, CA: DUP Satellite.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zagkas, V. K. 2013. “A Multi−Method Framework for Maritime Knowledge Modeling the Case of Piraeus Maritime Cluster.” Phd diss., National Technical University of Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Zagkas, V. K., and D. Lyridis. 2009. “An Analysis of Seaport Cluster Models for the Development and Competitiveness of Maritime Sectors: The Port of Piraeus.” Paper presented at the International Symposium on Maritime Logistics and Supply Chain Systems (MLOG 2009), Singapore, April 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zagkas, V. K., and D. Lyridis. 2010. “Maritime Clusters: A Temporary Trend or a Sustainable Tool for the Development of the Maritime Industry?” Paper presented at the IAME Conference 2010, Lisbon, July 7.
   Google Scholar
• Zagkas, V. K., and D. Lyridis. 2011. “A Framework for Modeling and Benchmarking Maritime Clusters: An Application to the Maritime Cluster of Piraeus.” In Advances in Maritime Logistics and Supply Chain Systems, edited by P. Chew, H. Lee, and C. Tang, 131–156. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Zikmund, W. G. 2000. Business Research Methods. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar