Incremental costs for reduction of air pollution from ships: a case study on North European emission control area

References

• Avis, M. J., and C. H. Birtch. 2009. Impacts on the EU Refining Industry & Markets of IMO Specification Changes & Other Measures to Reduce the Sulphur Content of Certain Fuels. London: Purvin & Gertz.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, O., S. O. Erikstad, and K. Fagerholt. 2012. “Optimized Selection of Air Emission Controls for Vessels.” Maritime Policy & Management (39) (4): 387–400. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.689877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, O., S. O. Erikstad, and K. Fagerholt. 2014. “Concurrent Design of Vessel Machinery System and Air Emission Controls to Meet Future Air Emissions Regulations.” Ocean Engineering 84: 283–292. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, O., C. Girard, S. O. Erikstad, and K. Fagerholt. 2015. “Optimized Selection of Vessel Air Emission Controls - Moving beyond Cost-Efficiency.” Maritime Policy & Management 42 (4): 362–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg. 2015. Bloomberg Commodity Index Data. New York: Bloomberg L.P.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, P., P. Coenen, E. Fridell, S. Åström, T. Palmer, and M. Holland. 2009. “Cost Benefit Analysis to Support the Impact Assessment Accompanying the Revision of Directive 1999/32/EC on the Sulphur Content of Certain Liquids Fuels.” AEA/ED45756/Issue 3, AEA Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Buhaug, Ø., J. Corbett, V. Eyring, Ø. Endresen, J. Faber, S. Hanayama, D. L. Lee, et al. 2009. Second IMO GHG Study 2009. London: IMO.
   Google Scholar
• Cengiz, R., H. J. Götze, R. Krapp, and S. Neddenien. 2008. Possible Technical Modifications on Pre-2000 Marine Diesel Engines for No_x Reductions. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D., and T. Gustafsson. 2004. “Methodology for calculating emissions from ships: Update of emission factors report series for SMED & SLU Swedish Methodology for Environmental Data (SMED).”
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, E., C. Hugi, and D. Cooper. 2005. Service Contract on Ship Emissions: Assignment, Abatement and Market-Based Instruments, Task 2b NO_x Abatement. Northwich: ENTEC.
   Google Scholar
• DNV (Det Norsk Veritas). 2005. Reduksjoner av NO_x i fartøyer: Tiltaksanalyse Teknisk Rapport No 2005-1095 Revisjon nr. 03 [In Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2015. Gas Prices for Industrial Consumers. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, L., and M. Luo. 2013. “Analysing Ship Investment Behaviour in Liner Shipping.” Maritime Policy & Management 40 (6): 511–533. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.776183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, J., S. Baer, and H. Ricklefs. 2013. Economic Comparison of Three No_x Emission Abatement Systems: Series B Report No: 99. Kotka: Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences. ISSN: 1239-9094.
   Google Scholar
• Hassellöv, I. M., D. R. Turner, A. Lauer, and J. J. Corbett. 2013. “Shipping Contributes to Ocean Acidification.” Geophysical Research Letters 40 (11): 2731–2736. doi:10.1002/grl.50521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J., Z. Nikopoulou, L. Ramstedt, and J. Woxenius. 2014. “Modelling Modal Choice Effects of Regulation on Low-Sulphur Marine Fuels in Northern Europe.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 28: 62–73. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2008. Resolution MEPC.176(58): Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as Modified by the Protocol of 1978 Relating Thereto (Revised MARPOL Annex VI). London: IMO.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. 1990. Combined Transport - Systems, Economics and Strategies, Tfb-Report. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Transport Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A., and R. Bergqvist. 2013. “Seaport Strategies for Pre-Emptive Defence of Market Share under Changing Hinterland Transport System Performance.” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 5: 4/5. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2013.055274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., J. Kronbak, and L. P. Christensen. 2014. “The Costs and Benefits of Sulphur Reduction Measures: Sulphur Scrubbers versus Marine Gas Oil.” Transportation Research Part D 28: 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordal-Jørgensen, J. 2012. Reducing Air Pollution from Ships - a Cost Benefit Analysis and Feasibility Study on Possible Means for Further Reduction of Emissions Environmental Project No. 1421. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of the Environment - Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Kalli, J. 2013. “Cost Efficiency Estimations of Abatement Techniques – BSR INNOSHIP.” Clean Shipping Currents 2: 7.
   Google Scholar
• Kish, L. 1965. Survey Sampling. ISBN 978-0471109495. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. O. 2012. Energy Demand and Exhaust Gas Emissions of Marine Engines: Project No. 2010-56, Work Package 2, Report No. 05. Emissionsbeslutningsstøttesystem. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Lappi, M., T. Borkowski, and J. Myskow. 2012. “Ship Emissions and Abatement Technology Assessment Part I: WP4 Enhancing and Piloting Transferable Innovative Cost-Effective Low Emission Solutions for Baltic Shipping.” Clean Shipping Currents 1 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, M. 2014. “NO_x Abatement technique for marine diesel engines – Improved marine SCR systems.” PhD diss., Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• MAN Diesel and Turbo. 2016. Emission Project Guide Two-Stroke Marine Engines 7020-0145-06. Copenhagen: MAN Diesel and Turbo.
   Google Scholar
• Nikopoulou, Z., and R. Bergqvist. 2010. Termin Rapport: Svenska Handels Flottan [In Swedish]. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Nikopoulou, Z., K. Cullinane, and A. Jensen. 2013. “The Role of a Cap-And-Trade Market in Reducing Nox and Sox Emissions: Prospects and Benefits for Ships within the Northern European ECA.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 227: 136–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTM (Nätverket för Transporter och Miljön). 2008. “Environmental data for international cargo and passenger: Calculation methods and default data – mode-specific issues. 081018 NTM Int. Sea.”
   Google Scholar
• OGP (International Association of Oil and Gas Producers). 2013. “Guidelines for Systems and Installations for Supply of LNG as Fuel to Ships - Draft 118683.” http://www.iogp.org/Portals/0/Standards/118683.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patricksson, Ø., and S. O. Erikstad. 2017. “A Two-Stage Optimization Approach for Sulphur Emission Regulation Compliance.” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (1): 94–111. doi:10.1080/03088839.2016.1237781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K. 2011. Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems Selection Guide. Prepared for Ship Operations Cooperative Program (SOCP) for US. Dept. of Transportation. Seattle: Glosten Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A., E. De Jonge, C. Hugi, and D. Cooper. 2005. Service Contract on Ship Emissions: Assignment, Abatement and Market-Based Instruments Task 2C-SO₂ Abatement. Northwich: ENTEC.
   Google Scholar
• Sames, P. C., N. B. Clausen, and M. L. Andersen. 2011. Costs and Benefits of LNG as Ship Fuel for Container Vessels: Key Results from GL and MAN Joint Study. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd
   Google Scholar
• Schinas, O., and C. N. Stefanakos. 2012. “Cost Assessment of Environmental Regulation and Options for Marine Operations.” Transport Research Part C 25: 81–99. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinas, O., and C. N. Stefanakos. 2014. “Selecting Technologies Towards Compliance with MARPOL Annex VI: The Perspective of Operators.” Transport Research Part D 28: 18–40. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., and K. X. Li. 2017. “Themes and Tools of Maritime Transport Research during 2000-2014.” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (2): 151-169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. 2016. “Revealed – the global LNG-fuelled fleet.” 16 Apr 2016. http://www.lngworldshipping.com/news/view,revealed-the-global-lngfuelled-fleet_42508.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. 2014. So_x and No_x: Consequences for the Baltic Sea of Direct Release and Scrubber Operation for Shiph. Motorways of the Sea: Department of Chemical and Molecular Biology. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• USA. 2013. MEPC 65/4/7 Air Pollution and Energy Efficiency Final Report of the Correspondence Group on Assessment of Technological Developments to Implement the Tier-III NOx Emission Standards under MARPOL Annex VI, submitted by the United States. London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wik, C., and S. Niemi. 2016. “Low Emission Engine Technologies for Future Tier-Iii Legislations - Options and Case Studies.” Journal of Shipping and Trade 1: 3. doi:10.1186/s41072-016-0009-z.
   Google Scholar
• Winnes, H. 2010. “Air pollution from ships: Emission Measures and Impact Assessment.” PhD diss., Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Winnes, H., and E. Fridell. 2009. “Particle Emissions from Ships: Dependence on Fuel Type.” Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 59: 1391–1398. doi:10.3155/1047-3289.59.12.1391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnes, H., E. Fridell, K. Yaramenka, D. Nelissen, J. Faber, and S. Ahdour. 2015. No_x Controls for Shipping in EU Seas. Stockholm, Sweden: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. L., D. Zhang, O. Caglayan, I. D. Jenkinson, S. Bonsall, J. Wanga, M. Huang, and X. P. Yan. 2012. “Selection of Techniques for Reducing Shipping Nox and Sox Emissions.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 17: 478–486. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar