Whatever floats your vote: understanding voter support for public port infrastructure investments

References

• AAPA (American Association of Port Authorities). 2015. Port Surface Transportation Infrastructure Survey: The State of Freight. Alexandria, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlfeldt, G. M., and W. Maennig. 2015. “Homevoters Vs. Leasevoters: A Spatial Analysis of Airport Effects.” Journal of Urban Economics 87 (2015): 85–99. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2015.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Altonji, M., C. Lang, and G. Puggioni. 2016. “Can Urban Areas Help Sustain the Preservation of Open Space? Evidence from Statewide Referenda.” Ecological Economics 130 (2016): 82–91. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.026.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, P. 2016. “R.I. Targets for Receivership Land Considered for Port of Providence Expansion.” The Providence Journal 25 (June): 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 2017. Infrastructure Report Card: Ports. Washington, D.C: edited by Economic Development Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A. J. 2004. “Public Goods and the Public Financing of European Seaports.” Maritime Policy & Management 31 (4): 375–391. doi:10.1080/0308883042000304890.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A., and E. Kretsch. 2019. “The Leadership Void for Climate Adaptation Planning: Case Study of the Port of Providence (Rhode Island, United States).” Frontiers in Earth Science 7 (2019): 29. doi:10.3389/feart.2019.00029.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, A. H., M. Acciaro, R. Asariotis, E. Cabrera, L. Cretegny, P. Crist, M. Esteban, et al. 2013. “A Note on Climate Change Adaptation for Seaports: A Challenge for Global Ports, A Challenge for Global Society.” Climatic Change 120 (4): 683–695. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0843-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, F. 2016. “Top Lawmakers Ignore Waterfront Environmental Concerns.” EcoRI News, August 17.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, R., and P. Shapiro. 1975. “Private Preference for Collective Goods Revealed through Voting on Referenda.” The American Economic Review 65 (5): 943–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAO (Government Accountabiity Office). 2012. “MARITIME INFRASTRUCTURE Opportunities Exist to Improve the Effectiveness of Federal Efforts to Support the Marine Transportation System.” In GAO-13-80 Report to Congress. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Heintzelman, M. D., P. J. Walsh, and D. J. Grzeskowiak. 2013. “Explaining the Appearance and Success of Open Space Referenda.” Ecological Economics 95 (2013): 108–117. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, M. E. 2002. “Demographic Change and the Demand for Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (1): 45. doi:10.1002/pam.1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, M. E., and J. G. Matsusaka. 1997. “Demand for Environmental Goods: Evidence from Voting Patterns on California Initiatives.” The Journal of Law and Economics 40 (1): 137–174. doi:10.1086/467369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, M. J., and S. M. Powers. 2006. “Explaining the Appearance and Success of Voter Referenda for Open-Space Conservation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 (1): 373–390. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsa, D. A., and A. R. Miller. 2019. “Who Votes for Medicaid Expansion? Lessons from Maine’s 2017 Referendum.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 44 (4): 563–588. doi:10.1215/03616878-7530801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, J. G. 2005. “Direct Democracy Works.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2): 185–206. doi:10.1257/0895330054048713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, E., M. Uwasu, and S. Polasky. 2007. “Voting on Open Space: What Explains the Appearance and Support of Municipal-Level Open Space Conservation Referenda in the United States?” Ecological Economics 62 (3–4): 580–593. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 2005. “Toward a Second-generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism.” International Tax and Public Finance 12 (4): 349–373. doi:10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, M., J. G. Brown, H. Kobryn, and S. A. Moore. 2017. “Identifying ‘Public Values’ for Marine and Coastal Planning: Are Non-residents Really so Different?” Ocean & Coastal Management 148 (2017): 9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.016.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson-Merkowitz, S., and C. Lang. 2019. “Smart Growth at the Ballot Box: Understanding Voting on Affordable Housing and Land Management Referendums.” Urban Affairs Review, no. 2019: 1078087419861430. doi:10.1177/1078087419861430.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, T., and K. Good. 2015. “The Economic Impact of ProvPort’s Terminal Services.” Economic and Real Estate Analysis for Sustainable Land Use Outcomes 2015: 2–45.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, P., S. Pearson-Merkowitz, and C. Lang. 2019. “The Individual Determinants of Support for Open Space Bond Referendums.” Land Use Policy 82 (2019): 258–268. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.009.
   Google Scholar
• Raimondo, G. 2016. “Time to Invest in Continued Success at Rhode Island’s Ports - by Governor Gina Raimondo.” New England Real Estate Journal, October 14.
   Google Scholar
• USDOT (U.S. Department of Transportation) Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2018. Port Performance Freight Statistics Annual Report to Congress 2018 Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Vining, A. R., and A. E. Boardman. 2008. “The Potential Role of Public-private Partnerships in the Upgrade of Port Infrastructure: Normative and Positive Considerations.” Maritime Policy & Management 35 (6): 551–569. doi:10.1080/03088830802469451.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., and B. Cutter. 2011. “Who Votes for Public Environmental Goods in California?” Ecological Economics 70 (3): 554–563. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar