Traffic and freight flow predictions and effects of capacity expansion in the urban–port road interface: The case of a port city in Poland

References

• Agnolucci, P., and D. Bonilla. 2009. “UK Freight Demand Elasticities and Decoupling.” Journal of Transport Economic and Policy 43 (3): 317–344.
   Google Scholar
• Ameli, M., J. Lebacque, and L. Leclercq. 2020. “Cross-comparison of Convergence Algorithms to Solve Trip-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems.” Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 35: 219–240. doi:10.1111/mice.12524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronietis, R., E. Van de Voorde, and T. Vanelslander. 2010. “Port Competitiveness Determinants of Selected European Ports in the Containerized Cargo Market”. Proceedings of IAME 2010 Conference. Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Bernacki, D., and C. Lis. 2017. “Statistical Estimation and Prediction of Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) on the First /Last Mile Road Sections in the Port of Szczecin.” Szczecin University Press. Economics Problems of Services 3 (128): 67–80. doi:10.18276/epu.2017.128-05.
   Google Scholar
• Book, B. 2015. “Road Infrastructure.” Warsaw: Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions (Jaspers)
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. H., and J. N. Chen. 2010. “Forecasting Container Throughput at Ports Using Genetic Programming.” Expert Systems with Applications 37: 2054–2058. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. C., J. Bottom, M. Mahut, A. Paz, R. Balakrishna, T. Waller, and J. Hicks. 2011. “Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Primer.” Transportation Research E-Circular C153 (6): 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, C. C., C. W. Chu, and G. S. Liang. 2008. “A Modified Regression Model for Forecasting the Volumes of Taiwan’s Import Containers.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 47: 797–807. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Couto Maia, L., and A. Fidalgo Do Couto. 2013. “An Innovative Freight Traffic Assignment Model for Multimodal Networks.” Computers in Industry 64 (2): 121–127. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2012.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., S. Proost, and K. Van Dender. 2005. “Congestion and Tax Competition in a Parallel Network.” European Economic Review 49 (8): 2013–2040. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., S. Proost, and K. Van Dender. 2008. “Private Port Pricing and Public Investment in Port and Hinterland Capacity.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42 (3): 527–561.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, G., I. Vierth, L. Tavasszy, and M. Ben-Akiva. 2013. “Recent Developments in National and International Freight Transport Models within Europe.” Transportation 40: 347–371. doi:10.1007/s11116-012-9422-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W. 2007. “Port Competition and Selection in Contestable Hinterlands: The Case of Austria.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 7 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W., J. van Meijeren, and L. A. Tavasszy. 2012. “Combining Models and Commodity Chain Research for Making Long-term Projections of Port Throughput: An Application to the Hamburg-Le Havre Range.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 12 (3): 310–331. doi:10.18757/ejtir.2012.12.3.2968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langhe, K., Ch. Sys, E. Van de Voorde, and T. Vaneslander. 2012. “Analysis of a Cost-benefit Study: Lessons to Be Learned for Large Investment Projects in Port Areas”. Association for European Transport. European Transport Conference Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, S., R. J. Verhaeghe, and A. A. J. Pols. 2003. “Economic Impacts and Public Financing of Port Capacity Investments: The Case of Rotterdam Port Expansion.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1820: 55–61. doi:10.3141/1820-07.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkerley, F., C. Rohr, and A. Daly. 2014. “Road Traffic Demand Elasticities. A Rapid Evidence Assessment”. Rand Europe. Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, L., and T. Notteboom. 2011. ““Small and Medium-Sized Ports (Smps) in Multi-Port Gateway Regions: The Role of Yingkou in the Logistics System of the Bohai Sea”.” In Current Issues in Shipping, Ports and Logistics, edited by T. Notteboom, 543–563. Antwerp: University Press Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, L., and T. Notteboom. 2013. “Peripheral Challenge by Small and Medium Sized Ports (Smps) in Multi-Port Gateway Regions: The Case Study of Northeast China.” Polish Maritime Research. Special Issue 20: 55–66. doi:10.2478/pomr-2013-0027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FHWA. 2004. Traffic Congestion and Reliability: Linking Solutions to Problems. the United States: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
   Google Scholar
• Fung, M. K. 2002. “Forecasting Hong Kong′s Container Throughput: An Error-correction Model.” Journal of Forecasting 21 (1): 69–80. doi:10.1002/for.818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G., and T. O′ Brien. 2007. “Reducing Port-Related Truck Emissions: The Terminal Gate Appointment System at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.” Transportation Research Part D 12 (7): 460–473. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2007.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, G., and T. O′ Brien. 2008. “Extended Gate Operations at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach: A Preliminary Assessment.” Maritime Policy & Management 35 (2): 215–235. doi:10.1080/03088830801956854.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2018. “Traffic Planning in Port-Cities.” Discussion paper. International Transport Forum. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Hanaoka, S., and M. B. Regmi. 2011. “Promoting Intermodal Freight Transport through the Development of Dry Ports in Asia: An Environmental Perspective.” IATSS Research 35: 16–23. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2011.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hayuth, Y., and D. F. Fleming. 1994. “Concepts of Strategic Commercial Location: The Case of Container Ports.” Maritime Policy & Management 21: 187–193. doi:10.1080/03088839400000042.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, E. C. M., W. Seabrooke, and G. K. C. Wong. 2004. “Forecasting Cargo Throughput for the Port of Hong Kong. Error Correction Model Approach.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 130 (4): 195–203. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:4(195).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Instruction for Assessing the Economic Efficiency of Road and Bridge Projects – Verification of the Research Method according to EU Recommendations and Update of Unit Prices as of 2007. Part II, Tables of Speed”.2008.Warsaw: Instytut Badawczy Dróg i Mostów. (in Polish) 84–86
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, J. E. 2015. “Throughput Port Demand Forecasting.” International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences 4: 1–4. doi:10.4172/2162-6359.1000293.
   Google Scholar
• Jourquin, B. 2005. “A Multi-flow Multi-modal Assignment Procedure Applied to the European Freight Transportation Networks.” Studies in Regional Science 35: 929–945. doi:10.2457/srs.35.929.
   Google Scholar
• Jourquin, B., and S. Limbourg. 2006. “Equilibrium Traffic Assignment on Large Virtual Networks: Implementation Issues and Limits for Multi-modal Freight Transport.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 6 (3): 205–228.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, M., C. Kosen, and T. Matrai. 2016. “Analysing the Speed-flow Relationship in Urban Road Traffic.” Acta Technica Jaurinensis 9: 128. doi:10.14513/actatechjaur.v9.n2.403.
   Google Scholar
• Kitamura, R. 2010. “The Effects of Added Transportation Capacity on Travel: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Results.” Transportation 36 (6): 754–762. doi:10.1007/s11116-009-9245-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. 1996. “Forecasting the Antwerp Maritime Traffic Flows Using Transformations and Intervention Models.” Journal of Forecasting 15 (5): 395–412. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199609)15:5<395::AID-FOR628>3.0.CO;2-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovyakovsky, E., and Y. Panova. 2011. “Dynamics of Russian Dry Ports.” Research in Transportation Economics 33: 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.008.
   Google Scholar
• Kramberger, T., B. Rupnik, G. Štrubelj, and K. Prah. 2015. “Port Hinterland Modelling Based on Port Choice.” Promet – Traffic and Transportation 27 (3): 195–203. doi:10.7307/ptt.v27i3.1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan, T. R., and P. William. 2002. Transportation Infrastructure, Freight Services Sector and Economic Growth, 43–44. Washington D.C: The U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/stella/meetings/20020115/Lakshmanan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lättilä, L., V. Hentuu, and O.-P. Hilmola. 2013. “Hinterland Operations of Seaports Do Matter: Dry Port Usage Effects on Transportation Costs and CO2 Emissions.” Transport Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 55: 23–42. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2013.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, L. V., T. A. Azai, W. C. Goh, and M. Belly Mandi. 2020. “The Development and Assessment of Free-flow Speed Models under Heterogeneous Traffic in Facilitating Sustainable Inter Urban Multilane Highways.” Sustainability 12: 1–17. doi:10.3390/su12083445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litman, T. 2007. Congestion Reduction Strategies: Identifying and Evaluating Strategies to Reduce Traffic Congestion. Victoria, BC, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. 2016. Smart Congestion Relief: Comprehensive Analysis of Traffic Congestion Costs and Congestion Reduction Benefits. Victoria, BC, Canada: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, P., D. Graham, and J. Laird. 2013. “The Direct and Wider Impacts of Transport Projects: A Review.” In A Handbook of Transport Economics, edited by A. D. Palma, R. Lindsey, E. Quinet, and R. Vickerman, 501–527. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Moya, J., and M. F. Valero. 2017. “Port Choice in Container Market: A Literature Review.” Transport Reviews 37 (3): 300–321. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1231233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matczak, M. 2020. “A Simplified Forecasting Model for the Estimation of Container Traffic in Seaports at National Level-the Case of Poland.” The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation 14 (1): 153–158. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meersman, H., F. Moglia, and E. Van de Voorde. 2002. “Forecasting Potential Throughput.” In Port Competitiveness. An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports, edited by W, 35–64. Antwerp: Winkelmans, De Boeck Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H., and E. Van de Voorde. 2013. “The Relationship between Economic Activity and Freight Transport.” In Developments in Transport Modelling. Lessons for the Freight Sector, edited by M. B. Akiva, H. Meersman, and E. Van de, 15–43. Vol. Voorde. UK: Emerald Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meersman, H. , and E. Van de Voorde. 2019. ““Freight Transport Models: Ready to Support Transport Policy of the Future? “.” Transport Policy 83: 97–101. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, O., and T. Dang. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Port-City Policies: A Comparative Approach.” OECD Regional Development Working Papers 2013-25. doi:10.1787/5K3TTG8ZN1ZT-EN
   Google Scholar
• Merk, O., and T. Notteboom. 2015. “Port Hinterland Connectivity.” Discussion Paper no 2015-13, International Transport Forum, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• “Method of Carrying Out the General Traffic Measurement in 2015”.2014 (GTM 2015 Guidelines, attachment B), the General Directorate for National Roads and Motorways, Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• Muravev, D., H. Hu, A. Rakhmangulov, and P. Mishkurov. 2020. “Multi-agent Optimization of the Intermodal Terminal Main Parameters by Using AnyLogic Simulation Platform: Case Study on the Ningbo-Zhoushan Port.” International Journal of Information Management 57. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfongt.2020.102133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muravev, D., A. Rakhamngulov, H. Hu, and H. Zhou. 2019. “The Introduction to System Dynamics Approach to Operational Efficiency and Sustainability of Dry Port′s Main Parameters.” Sustainability 11 (8): 2413. doi:10.3390/su11082413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muravev, D., and A. Rakhmangulov. 2016. “Environmental Factors′ Consideration at Industrial Transportation Organization in the Seaport-Dry Port System.” Open Engineering 6 (1): 476–484. doi:10.1515/eng-2016-0070.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, P., M. S. Nicolaisen, and A. Strand. 2012. “Traffic Forecasts Ignoring Induced Demand: A Shaky Fundament for Costs-benefit Analyses.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 12 (3). doi:10.18757/ejtir.2012.12.3.2967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M., and S. T. Waller. 2010 . “Reliable Evacuation Planning via Demand Inflation and Supply Deflation.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (6): 1086–1094. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2010.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M., and S. T. Waller. 2012. “A Dynamic Route Choice Model considering Uncertain Capacities.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 27 (4): 231–243. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00724.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. 2005. “The Peripheral Port Challenge in Container Port Systems.” In International Maritime Transport: Perspectives, edited by H. Leggate, J. Mcconville, and A. Morvillo, 173–188. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and W. Yim Yap. 2012. “Port Competition and Competitiveness.” In The Blackwell Companion to Maritime Economics, edited by K. Wayne and W. Talley, 549–570, Blackwell Publishing. USA and UK.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. “The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: Synthesis Report”. OECD Port-Cities Programme. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Ortúzar, J. D., and L. G. Willumsen. 2011. Modelling Transport. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Parola, F., M. Risitano, M. Ferretti, and E. Panetti. 2016. “The Drivers of Port Competitiveness: A Critical Review.” Transport Reviews 37. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1231232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojo, M. 2020. “Evaluation of Traffic Assignment Models through Simulations.” Sustainability 12 (5536): 5536. doi:10.3390/su12145536.
   Google Scholar
• Roso, V. 2007. “Evaluation of the Dry Port Concept from an Environmental Perspective: A Note.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 12: 523–527. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2007.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roso, V. 2009. “The Emergence and Significance of Dry Ports: The Case of the Port of Geteborg.” World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 2: 296–310. doi:10.1504/WRITR.2009.026209.
   Google Scholar
• Roso, V. 2013. “Sustainable Intermodal Transport via Dry Ports: Importance of Directional Development.” World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research 4: 140–156. doi:10.1504/WRITR.2013.058976.
   Google Scholar
• Roso, V., and K. Lumsden. 2010. “A Review of Dry Ports.” Maritime Economics and Logistics 12: 196–213. doi:10.1057/mel.2010.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roso, V., J. Woxenius, and K. Lumsden. 2009. “The Dry Port Concept: Connecting Container Seaports with the Hinterland.” Journal of Transport Geography 17: 338–345. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothengatter, W. 2000. “Evaluation of Infrastructure Investments in Germany.” Transport Policy 7 (1): 17–23. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00012-3.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, S., T. Fowkes, T. Whiteing, and D. Johnson. “Econometric Modelling and Forecasting of Freight Transport Demand in Great Britain”. In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 5–7 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, B., and J. J. Wang. 2002. “The Challenge of Peripheral Ports; an Asian Perspective.” Geojournal 56 (2): 159–166. doi:10.1023/A:1022452714114.
   Google Scholar
• Sloboden, J., J. Lewis, and V. Alexiadis. 2012. “Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume XIV: Guidebook on the Utilization of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Modelling”. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
   Google Scholar
• Sys, C., and T. Vanelslander. 2018. “Port Hinterland Relations: Lessons to Be Learned from a Cost-benefit Analysis of a Large Investment Project.” In “Ports and Networks. Strategies, Operations and Perspectives”, edited by H. Geerlings, B. Kuipers, and R. Zuidwijk. Routledge. 146–161.
   Google Scholar
• Szeto, W. Y., and S. C. Wong. 2012. “Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Model Classifications and Recent Advances in Travel Choice Principles.” Central European Journal of Engineering 2 (1): 1–18. doi:10.2478/s13531-011-0057-y.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. G., and E. Taniguchi. 2008. “City Logistics and Freight Transport.” In Handbook of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management (Vol.2), edited by A. M. Brewer, K. J. Button, and D. A. Hensher, 393–405. UK: Emerald Publishing Group. doi:10.1108/9780080435930-025.
   Google Scholar
• Treintis, K., S. Sarangi, D. Teodorovic, and L. Rozzolini. 2011. “Traffic Congestion Mitigation: Combining Engineering and Economic Perspectives.” Transportation Planning and Technology 34 (7): 637–645. doi:10.1080/03081060.2011.602845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dorsser, C., M. Wolters, and B. Wee Van. 2011. “A Very Long-term Forecast of the Port Throughput in the Le Havre-Hamburg Range up to 2100.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 12 (1): 88–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Exel, J., S. Rienstra, M. Gommers, A. Pearman, and D. Tsamboulas. 2002. “EU Involvement in TEN Developments: Network Effects and European Value Added.” Transport Policy 9 (4): 299–311. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00016-1.
   Google Scholar
• van Lint, H., and C. Hinsbergen. 2012. “Short-term and Travel Time Prediction Models.” Artificial Intelligence Applications to Critical Transportation Issues 22: 22–41.
   Google Scholar
• Veenstra, A. W., and E. H. Haralambides. 2001. “Multivariate Autoregressive Models for Forecasting Seaborn Trade Flows.” Transportation Research Part E 37 (4): 395–412. doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00020-X.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., L. J. Basso, and A. Zhang. 2016. “Strategic Investments in Accessibility under Port Competition and Inter-regional Coordination.” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 93: 102–125. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., C. L. Yuen, and A. Zhang. 2014. “Effects of Hinterland Accessibility on US Container Port Efficiency.” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 6 (4): 422–440. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2014.062908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., and A. Zhang. 2013. “Urban Road Congestion and Seaport Competition.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 47 (1): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., A. Zhang, and K. X. Li. 2018. “Port Competition with Accessibility and Competition: A Theoretical Framework and Literature Review on Empirical Studies.” Maritime Policy &Management 45 (2): 239–259. doi:10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, Y., A. Zhang, and C. L. Yuen. 2013. “Urban Road Congestion, Capacity Expansion and Port Competition: Empirical Analysis of US Container Ports.” Maritime Policy & Management 40 (5): 417–438. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.797615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F. L. 2009. “Study on the Relationship of Huizhou Port and Huizhou Economy.” Journal of Huizhou University 29 (4): 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. J., J. Wang, and C. Ducret. 2012. “Peripheral Challenge in Container Port System: A Case Study of Pearl River Delta.” Chinese Geographical Science 22: 97–108. doi:10.1007/s11769-012-0517-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmsmeier, G., and J. Monios. 2013. “Counterbalancing Peripherality and Concentration: An Analysis of the UK Container Port System.” Maritime Policy & Management 40 (2): 116–132. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.756588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, A., L. J. Basso, and A. Zhang. 2008. “Effects of Gateway Congestion Pricing on Optimal Road Pricing and Hinterland.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42 (3): 495–526.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. 2008. “The Impact of Hinterland Access Conditions on Rivalry between Ports.” OECD/ITF Discussion Paper 2008-8, Paris. doi: 10.1787/235411150338.
   Google Scholar