Alignment of port policy to the context of the Physical Internet

References

• Ahmad, R. W., H. Hasan, R. Jayaraman, K. Salah, and M. Omar. 2021. “Blockchain Applications and Architectures for Port Operations and Logistics Management.” In Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100620.
   Google Scholar
• Aregall, M. G., R. Bergqvist, and J. Monios. 2018. “A Global Review of the Hinterland Dimension of Green Port Strategies.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 59: 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvis, J. F., L. Ojala, C. Wiederer, B. Shepherd, A. Raj, K. Dairabayeva, and T. Kiiski. 2018. Connecting to Compete 2018: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, M., T. R. Walker, G. M. Magnan, M. Adams, and M. Acciaro. 2020. “A Review of Corporate Sustainability Drivers in Maritime Ports: A multi-stakeholder Perspective.” Maritime Policy & Management 47 (8): 1027–1044. doi:10.1080/03088839.2020.1736354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballot, E., O. Gobet, and B. Montreuil. 2012a. Physical Internet Enabled Open Hub Network Design for Distributed Networked Operations. In Service Orientation in Holonic and multi-agent Manufacturing Control, 279–292. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ballot, E., B. Montreuil, and C. Thivierge. 2012b. Functional Design of Physical Internet Facilities: A Road-rail Hub. 12th IMHRC Proceedings. Gardanne,: France – 2012). 13.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerkan, K. Y., and H. Seter. 2019. “Reviewing Tools and Technologies for Sustainable Ports: Does Research Enable Decision Making in Ports?” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 72: 243–260. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeirinha, V., J. L. Nabais, and C. Pinto. 2022. “Port Community Systems: Accelerating the Transition of Seaports toward the Physical Internet—The Portuguese Case.” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10 (2): 152. doi:10.3390/jmse10020152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, F., S. Gailus, L. Liu, and L. Ni (2018). The Future of Automated Ports. McKinsey & Company – Travel, Transport & Logistics. Accessed on https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/travel-transport-and-logistics/our-insights/the-future-of-automated-ports
   Google Scholar
• Delenclos, F. X., A. Rasmussen, and J. Riedl (2018). To Get Smart, Ports Go Digital. Boston Consulting Group – Shipping Industry, Logistics, Digital Transformation. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2018/to-get-smart-ports-go-digital
   Google Scholar
• DHL. 2021. Logistics Trend Radar. Accessed 22 March 2021. https://www.dhl.com/global-en/home/insights-and-innovation/insights/logistics-trend-radar.html
   Google Scholar
• Di Vaio, A., L. Varriale, and F. Alvino. 2018. “Key Performance Indicators for Developing Environmentally Sustainable and Energy Efficient Ports: Evidence from Italy.” Energy Policy 122: 229–240. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink, B., J. Kwakkel, P. Bots, L. Hermans, W. Thissen, and J. Koppenjan. 2010. Policy Analysis of multi-actor Systems. The Hague: LEMMA.
   Google Scholar
• Fahim, P. B. M., R. An, J. Rezaei, Y. Pang, B. Montreuil, and L. Tavasszy. 2021c. “An Information Architecture to Enable track-and-trace Capability in Physical Internet Ports.” Computers in Industry 129: 103443. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahim, P. B. M., U. Martinez de, M. Alvarez de Sotomayor, J. Rezaei, A. Van Binsbergen, M. Nijdam, and L. Tavasszy. 2021a. “On the Evolution of Maritime Ports Towards the Physical Internet.” Futures 134: 102834. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2021.102834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahim, P. B. M., J. Rezaei, R. Jayaraman, M. Poulin, B. Montreuil, and L. Tavasszy. 2021b. “The Physical Internet & Maritime Ports: Ready for the Future?” IEEE Engineering Management Review 49 (4): 136–149. doi:10.1109/EMR.2021.3113932.
   Google Scholar
• Fahim, P. B. M., J. Rezaei, B. Montreuil, and L. Tavasszy. 2022. “Port Performance Evaluation and Selection in the Physical Internet.” Transport Policy 124: 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, H. R., K. Salah, R. Jayaraman, I. Yaqoob, and M. Omar. 2020. “Blockchain Architectures for Physical Internet: A Vision, Features, Requirements, and Applications.” IEEE Network 35 (2): 174–181. doi:10.1109/MNET.021.2000442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, M. H., Z. Yang, and J. S. L. Lam. 2019. “Port Performance in Container Transport Logistics: A multi-stakeholder Perspective.” Transport Policy 73: 25–40. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, L., and H. Geerlings. 2016. “Dynamics in Sustainable Port and Hinterland Operations: A Conceptual Framework and Simulation of Sustainability Measures and Their Effectiveness, Based on an Application to the Port of Shanghai.” Journal of Cleaner Production 135: 449–456. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (2019). Emissions – Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019 – Analysis – IEA. Accessed on https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019/emissions
   Google Scholar
• Iida, J., D. Watanabe, K. Nagata, and M. Matsuda. 2019. “Sharing Procedure Status Information on Ocean Containers across Countries Using Port Community Systems with Decentralized Architecture.” Asian Transport Studies 5 (4): 694–719.
   Google Scholar
• Inkinen, T., R. Helminen, and J. Saarikoski. 2021. “Technological Trajectories and Scenarios in Seaport Digitalization.“ Research in Transportation Business & Management 41: 100633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCSA. 2018. November “Sustainable Freight Transport in Support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” In UNCTAD Multiyear Expert Meeting on Transport, Trade Logistics and Trade Facilitation, 21–23. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D., and S. Kim. 2017. “Conceptual Model Development of Sustainability Practices: The Case of Port Operations for Collaboration and Governance.” Sustainability 9 (12): 2333. doi:10.3390/su9122333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakostas, B. 2019. “Modelling and Simulation of a Physical Internet of Transportation Hubs.” Procedia Computer Science 151: 17–22. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, J. S. L., and T. E. Notteboom. 2014. “The Greening of Ports: A Comparison of Port Management Tools Used by Leading Ports in Asia and Europe.” Transport Reviews 34 (2): 169–189. doi:10.1080/01441647.2014.891162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, P. T. W., and J. S. L. Lam. 2016. “Developing the fifth generation ports model.“ In Dynamic Shipping and Port Development in the Globalized Economy: Volume 2: Emerging Trends in Ports, 186–210. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens, N., J. Gijsbrechts, and R. Boute. 2019. “Synchromodality in the Physical Internet–dual Sourcing and Real-time Switching between Transport Modes.” European Transport Research Review 11 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12544-019-0357-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meindl, B., N. F. Ayala, J. Mendonça, and A. G. Frank. 2021. “The Four Smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten Years of Research and Future Perspectives.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 168: 120784. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, J. 2014. “The Information Highway Gets Physical.” Science 344 (6188): 1104–1107. doi:10.1126/science.344.6188.1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., and J. Rezaei. 2020a. “Bayesian Best-worst Method: A Probabilistic Group Decision Making Model.” Omega 96: 102075. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2019.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, M., and J. Rezaei. 2020b. “Evaluating and Comparing Ontology Alignment Systems: An MCDM Approach.” Journal of Web Semantics 64: 100592. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2020.100592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B. 2011. “Toward a Physical Internet: Meeting the Global Logistics Sustainability Grand Challenge.” Logistics Research 3: 71–87. doi:10.1007/s12159-011-0045-x.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B. (2020). The Physical Internet: Shaping a Global Hyperconnected Logistics Infrastructure. IPIC 2020 International Physical Internet Conference, Keynote Speech 2020/11/18, Shenzen, China, https://www.picenter.gatech.edu/sites/default/files/ipic2020-keynotehyperconnectedlogisticsinfrastructure_20201116_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B., E. Ballot, and W. Tremblay. 2016. Modular Design of Physical Internet Transport, Handling and Packaging Containers, Material Handling Research, 03-16-2016, Charlotte, NC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B., S. Buckley, L. Faugère, R. Khir, and S. Derhami. 2018. Urban Parcel Logistics Hub and Network Design: The Impact of Modularity and Hyperconnectivity. Progress in Material Handling Research: 2018, (Ed.) A. Carrano. Charlotte, NC, USA: MHI.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B., L. McGinnis, and S. Buckley (2021). Framework and Research Roadmap for a Next-Generation Hyperconnected Logistics Hub, Proceedings of IPIC 2021 International Physical Internet Conference, Virtual, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B., R. D. Meller, and E. Ballot. 2013. ”Physical Internet foundations.“ In Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi Agent Manufacturing and Robotics, 151–166. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montreuil, B., R. D. Meller, C. Thivierge, and Z. Montreuil. 2012. Functional Design of Physical Internet Facilities: A Road-based Crossdocking Hub. IMHRC Proceedings, 03-16-2012, Gardanne, France.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T. E., and J. S. L. Lam. 2018. “The Greening of Terminal Concessions in Seaports.” Sustainability 10 (9): 3318. doi:10.3390/su10093318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Port of Rotterdam. 2019. Port Vision Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Port of Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. 2015. “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making Method.” Omega 53: 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. 2020. “A Concentration Ratio for Nonlinear Best Worst Method.” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 19 (3): 891–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J., M. Kouhizadeh, and Q. S. Zhu. 2021. “Digitalization and the Greening of Supply Chains.” Industrial Management & Data Systems 121 (1): 65–85. doi:10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, D. B. (2021). Volocopter and DB Schenker Announce First Blueprint for VoloDrone Operations. https://www.dbschenker.com/global/about/press/volocopter-and-db-schenker-announce-first-blueprint-for-volodrone-operations-708858
   Google Scholar
• Simmer, L., S. Pfoser, M. Grabner, O. Schauer, and L. M. Putz. 2017. “From Horizontal Collaboration to the Physical Internet–A Case Study from Austria.” International Journal of Transport Development and Integration 1 (2): 129–136. doi:10.2495/TDI-V1-N2-129-136.
   Google Scholar
• Treiblmaier, H., K. Mirkovski, P. B. Lowry, and Z. G. Zacharia. 2020. “The Physical Internet as a New Supply Chain Paradigm: A Systematic Literature Review and a Comprehensive Framework.” International Journal of Logistics Management 31 (2): 239–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lugt, L. M., P. W. de Langen, and L. Hagdorn. 2017. “Strategic Beliefs of Port Authorities.” Transport Reviews 37 (4): 412–441. doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1245685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Luik, S., T. Fiebig, P. B. M. Fahim, P. De Waard, and L. Tavasszy. 2020. “On the Value of the Digital Internet/Physical Internet Analogy.” Journal of Supply Chain Management Science 1 (3–4): 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and J. Sarkis. 2021. “Emerging Digitalisation Technologies in Freight Transport and Logistics: Current Trends and Future Directions.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 148: 102291. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World, D. P. (2020). DP World and Virgin Hyperloop Hail Decision that Brings Hyperloop Systems One Step Closer to Reality. Accessed on https://www.dpworld.com/news/releases/dp-world-and-virgin-hyperloop-hail-decision-that-brings-hyperloop-systems-one-step-closer-to-reality/
   Google Scholar