Taking maritime shipping agreements out of the box

References

• ALPHALINER. 2020. Alphaliner Top 100 on 31 December 2020. https://alphaliner.axsmarine.com/PublicTop100
   Google Scholar
• ALPHALINER. 2022. Top 30 Carriers.Monthly monitor January 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., A. V. Shipilov, and T. J. Rowley. 2003. “Where Do Small Worlds Come From?” Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (4): 697–725. doi:10.1093/icc/12.4.697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudouin, V. 2016. “Statistical Analysis of Textual Data: Benzécri and the French School of Data Analysis.” Glottometrics 33: 56–72. https://hal.telecom-paris.fr/hal-02191472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braakman, A. J. 2013. “The Anti-Competitive Effects of a Globally Concentrated, Oligopolistic Maritime Market: From Explicit to Tacit Collusion - an Analysis Based on P3 Network.” Journal of International Maritime Law 19: 419–436.
   Google Scholar
• Braakman, A. J. 2017. “Hub-And-Spoke Cartels in the Container Liner Shipping Industry.” Journal of International Maritime Law 23: 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Braakman, A. J. 2019. “Shipping lines create a trinity: digitalisation, globalisation, monopolisation.” Journal of Maritime Law 25: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Braakman, A. J. 2020. “Does the Digital Leviathan Spell the End of Fair Competition in the Shipping industry?”Journal of International Maritime Law.” 26: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Braakman, A. J. 2021. “The Market Definition and the Global Containerized Liner Chipping End-To-End Services.” Journal of International Maritime Law 27: 257–265.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R. 2000. Sea Change in Liner Shipping: Regulation and Managerial Decision-Making in a Global Industry. Oxford: Pergamom.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., H. Meersman, C. Sys, E. Van de Voorde, and T. Vanleslander. 2019. “Operational Report: Regulation in the Liner Shipping Industry: Pathway to a Balance of Interests.” 48 pages. https://medialibrary.uantwerpen.be/oldcontent/container17056/files/20190612%20-%20Technical%20Report%20Dalhousie%20University%20-%20University%20of%20Antwerp2.pdf?_ga=2.209270354.1739668134.1669211440-1156348396.1669211440&_gl=1*9prs49*_ga*MTE1NjM0ODM5Ni4xNjY5MjExNDQw*_ga_WVC36ZPB1Y*MTY2OTIxMTQ0MC4xLjEuMTY2OTIxMTUxMy42MC4wLjA.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. R., C. Sys, and T. Vanelslander. 2022. “Regulation in the Liner Shipping Industry: Pathways to a Balance of Interests.” International Journal of Transport Economics 48 (3–4): 289–313. doi:10.19272/202106704001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariou, P. 2000. Les alliances stratégiques dans le transport maritime de lignes régulières : efficacité ou pouvoir de marché? Thesis Nantes: University of Nantes.
   Google Scholar
• Cariou, P. 2008. “Liner Shipping Strategies: An Overview.” International Journal of Ocean Systems Management 1 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1504/IJOSM.2008.017778.
   Google Scholar
• Cariou, P., and P. Guillotreau. 2021. “Capacity Management by Global Shipping Alliances: Findings from a Game Experiment.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 24 (1): 41–66. doi:10.1057/s41278-021-00184-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caschili, S., F. Medda, F. Parola, and C. Ferrari. 2014. “An Analysis of Shipping Agreements: The Cooperative Container Network.” Networks and Spatial Economics 14 (3–4): 357–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-014-9230-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CMG CGM. (2021). CMA CGM Website. https://www.cmacgm-group.com/en/group-and-vision/our-activities/air-freight
   Google Scholar
• Corruble, P. 2015. “Global Shipping Alliances: What Prospects After the Rejection of the P3 Project by China’s Competition Authority?” Journal of International Maritime Law 21: 203–211.
   Google Scholar
• Corruble, P. 2021. EU Competition Law Applicable to Liner Shipping and Seaports - New Challenges of the Regulation. Bruylant. Bruxelles: Larcier.
   Google Scholar
• ESC. 2019. ESC Position Paper Block Exemption Regulation. March, Brussels, 10 pages.
   Google Scholar
• ESC. 2020. ESC and CLECAT urge carriers to switch to a ‘new normal’ as current practices slow economic recovery of European businesses. https://www.clecat.org/news/press-releases/esc-and-clecat-urge-carriers-to-switch-to-a-new-no
   Google Scholar
• ESC. 2021. “CERAME-UNIE and ESC Press Release on Shipping Containers.” https://europeanshippers.eu/download/cerame-unie-and-esc-press-release-on-shipping-containers/
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2020. Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/436 of 24 March 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application, C/2020/1734. OJ L 90, 25.3.2020, p. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 of 28 September 2009 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia), OJ L 256, 29.9.2009, p. 31-34.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN COUNCIL. 2006. Council Regulation (EC) No 1419/2006 of 25 September 2006 repealing Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 laying down detailed rules for the application of Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty to maritime transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 as regards the extension of its scope to include cabotage and international tramp services […] OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPEAN SHIPPERS COUNCIL (ESC). 2019. Position paper – Block Exemption Regulation. Brussels, Belgium. Online available at https://europeanshippers.eu/download/position-paper-2019-03-block-exemption-regulation/
   Google Scholar
• FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION (FMC). 2012. Study of the 2008 Repeal of the Liner Conference Exemption from European Competition Law. Washington, U.S, 350 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Fedi, L. 2013. “L’abrogation des conférences maritimes dans l’Union européenne : premiers bilans et perspectives d’évolution.” Droit Maritime Français 750: 697–711.
   Google Scholar
• Fedi, L. 2019. “Alliances stratégiques dans l’industrie des liners : les voies de réponses du droit de la concurrence européen et international.” Droit Maritime Français 816: 675–686.
   Google Scholar
• Fedi, L., and M. Besancon. 2008. “La fin du régime des conférences maritimes : vers une concurrence pure et parfaite du transport par mer au départ ou à destination de l’Union européenne ?.” Droit Maritime Français 696: 791–803.
   Google Scholar
• Fedi, L., O. Faury, P. Rigot-Muller, and N. Montier. 2022. “COVID-19 as a catalyst of a new container port hierarchy in Mediterranean Sea and Northern Range.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 24 (4): 747–777. doi:10.1057/s41278-022-00223-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedi, L., and M. Tourneur. 2015. “Les consortia et les alliances (géo)stratégiques face aux nouveaux enjeux du transport maritime conteneurisé.” Droit Maritime Français 769: 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• FEPORT. 2019. Threat on fair level playing field within the maritime logistics chain. 27 November. Date of access 1 April 2021. https://www.feport.eu/media-corner/news/news/526-press-release-threat-on-fair-level-playing-field-within-the-maritime-logistics-chain
   Google Scholar
• Flament, C. 1962. “L’analyse de similitude.” Cahiers Du Centre de Recherche Opérationnelle 4: 63–97.
   Google Scholar
• FMC. 2021a. Executive Summary of Fact Finding 29 Presented as part of the record submitted by Commissioner Dye to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard & Maritime Transportation June 15, 2021. https://www.fmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/061021DyeTestimonyExecutiveSummary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FMC. 2021b. Fact Finding Investigation No. 29. Interim Recommendations. https://www2.fmc.gov/ReadingRoom/docs/FFno29/FF29%20Interim%20Recommendations.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• FMC. 2022. Docket no. 21-09. Hapag-Lloyd, A.G. and Hapag-Lloyd (America) llc. —Possible violations of 46 U.S.C. § 41102(c).
   Google Scholar
• Fusillo, M., and H. Haralambides. 2020. “Do Carrier Expectations Indicate Industry Structure in Container Shipping? An Econometric Analysis.” Journal of Shipping and Trade 5 (1): 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0057-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, M., M. Acciaro, S. Transchel, and P. Cariou. 2022. “Strategic alliances in container shipping: A review of the literature and future research agenda.” Maritime Economics and Logistics 24 (2): 439–465. doi:10.1057/s41278-021-00205-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haralambides, H. 2007. “Structure and operations in Liner shipping.” In Handbook of Transport Modelling., edited by D. Hensher and K. J. Button, 607–621. Vol. 40. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Haralambides, H. E. 2019. “Gigantism in container shipping, ports and global logistics: a time-lapse into the future.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 21 (1): 1–60. doi:10.1057/s41278-018-00116-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaver, T., H. Meersman, F. Moglia, and E. Van de Voorde. 2000. “Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?.” Maritime Policy & Management 27 (4): 363–373. doi:10.1080/030888300416559.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltunen, R. 2001. “Some Syntactic Properties of English Law Language: Twenty-five years after Gustafsson.” In English in Zigs and Zags: A Festschrift for Marita Gustafsson, Anglicana Turkuensia 23. edited by K. Battarbee, M. Peikola, S.-K. Tanskanen, and R. Hiltunen, 56–63, Turku: University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Ichimura Y, Dalaklis D, Kitada M and Christodoulou A. (2022). Shipping in the era of digitalization: Mapping the future strategic plans of major maritime commercial actors. Digital Business, 2(1), 100022 10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100022.
   Google Scholar
• INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM (ITF). 2018. The impacts of Alliances in container shipping – Case specific policy analysis, 127. Paris, France: OECD.ITF.
   Google Scholar
• Kanuk, L. 1984. “UNCTAD Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences: Trade Milestone or Millstone-Time will soon tell the perspectives.” Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 6 (2): 357–372.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrou, M., D. Watanabe, and J. Iida. 2019. “Shipping digitalization management: conceptualization, typology and antecedents.” Journal of Shipping and Trade 4 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s41072-019-0052-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lavissière, M. C., and L. Fedi. 2022. “Maritime Cooperative Working Agreements: towards variability or standardization?.” Journal of Professional and Scientific Communication – FACHSPRACHE XLIV (3–4): 130–147. doi:10.24989/fs.v44i3-4.2029.
   Google Scholar
• Lavissière, M. C., A. Lavissière, and L. Fedi. 2021. Genre as a Double-edged Sword in Language for Specific Purposes: Variability and Standardization in Cooperative Agreements. LSA 2021 Conference, 7–10 January, San Francisco, US.
   Google Scholar
• Loubère, L., and P. Ratinaud. 2014. Documentation IRaMuTeQ 0.6 alpha 3. http://www.iramuteq.org/documentation/fichiers/documentation_19_02_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Luo, M., L. Fan, and W. Wilson. 2014. “Firm Growth and Market Concentration in Liner Shipping.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 48 (1): 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, P., and P. Ratinaud. 2012. ”L’analyse de similitude appliquée aux corpus textuels : Les primaires socialistes pour l’élection présidentielle française (septembre-octobre 2011).” Actes Des 11eme Journées Internationales d’Analyse Statistique Des Données Textuelles 687–699. JADT.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, R. 2006. “Liner Shipping Development Trends.” Maritime Policy & Management 33 (5): 519–525. doi:10.1080/03088830601020752.
   Google Scholar
• Merk, O., J. Hoffmann, and H. Haralambides. 2022. “Post-Covid 19 scenarios for the governance of maritime transport and ports.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 24 673–685 doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00228-8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk, O., and A. Teodoro. 2022. “Alternative approaches to measuring concentration in liner shipping.” Maritime Economics and Logistics 24 (4): 723–746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00225-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midoro, R., and A. Pitto. 2000. “A critical evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping.” Maritime Policy & Management 27 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/030888300286662.
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., and H. E. Haralambides. 2020. “Port Management and Governance in a Post-COVID-19 Era: Quo Vadis?.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 22 (3): 329–352. doi:10.1057/s41278-020-00162-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., T. Pallis, and J. -P. Rodrigue. 2021. “Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: the COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 23 (2): 179–210. doi:10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notteboom, T., T. Pallis, and J. -P. Rodrigue. 2022. Port Economics, Management and Policy. 690 pages/218 illustrations. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2002. Competition Policy in Liner Shipping.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015a. Competition issues in the liner industry. Paper by Ana Rodrigues, Claudio Ferrari, Francesco Parola and Alessio Tei. Note by the Secretariat. Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation, DAF/COMP/WP2(2015)3.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015b. Competition issues in the liner industry. Paper by H. Meersman, C. Sys, E. Van de Voorde and T. Vanelslander. Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation DAF/COMP/WP2(2015)5.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M., and R. Wiedmer. 2011. “Strategic alliances in container liner shipping.” Research in Transportation Economics 32 (1): 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2011.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• Parola, F., S. Caschili, F. Medda, and C. Ferrari. 2014. “Measuring the scope of inter-firm agreements in the container shipping industry: an empirical assessment.” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics 6 (5): 466–487. doi:10.1504/IJSTL.2014.064571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premti, A. 2019.New antitrust amendments to the U.S. Shipping Act. Article No 31 UNCTAD Transport and Trade Facilitation Newsletter N°81 - First Quarter.
   Google Scholar
• Ratinaud, P. 2014. IRaMuTeQ : Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (Version 0.7 alpha 2) [ Windows, GNU/Linux, Mac OS X]. http://www.iramuteq.org
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, M. 1983. “Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique: Application à l’analyse lexicale par contexte.” Cahiers de l’Analyse Des Données 8 (2): 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, B., C. Comtois, and R. McCalla. 2002. “Strategic Alliances in the Container Shipping Industry: A Global Perspective.” Maritime Policy & Management 29 (1): 65–76. doi:10.1080/03088830110063694.
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. 2009. Maritime Economics. 3rd ed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thanopoulou, H. A., D. K. Ryoo, and T. W. Lee. 1999. “Korean liner shipping in the era of global alliances.” Maritime Policy & Management 26 (3): 209–229. doi:10.1080/030888399286853.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 1975. United Nations conference of plenipotentiaries on a Code of conduct for liner conferences held at Geneva from 12 November to 15 December 1973 (first part) and from 11 March to 6 April 1974 (second part). Geneva: UN, New-York. Volume 11 Final Act.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2016. Liner shipping: is there a way for more competition? Paper by Anila Premti. Discussion paper No. 224. UNCTAD/OSG/DP/2016/1.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2020. Review of Maritime Transport 2020. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2021a. Review of Maritime Transport 2021. Geneva: UNCTAD.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2021b. Container shipping in times of Covid-19: why freight rates have surged and implications for policymakers, Geneva. Policy brief n°84, April.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. CONGRESS. 1998. Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. 105th US Congress, Public Law 105-258. October 14, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. CONGRESS. 2017. The Federal Maritime Commission Authorisation Act of 2017. 115th US Congress. A Bill to authorize appropriations for the Federal Maritime Commission for fiscal years 2018 and 2019, and for other purposes. H.R. 2593, Report No. 115–1017.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. CONGRESS. 2022. Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. 136 stat. 1272, Public Law 117–146 - June 16, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. CONGRESS. 1984. Shipping Act of 1984. 47th US Congress, Public Law, 98-237, March 20, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. -H. 2014. “Ocean shipping deregulation restructures the liner shipping industry.” Maritime Policy & Management 41 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1080/03088839.2013.780312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WORLD SHIPPING COUNCIL. 2022. About the industry. How liner shipping works. https://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/how-liner-shipping-works.
   Google Scholar