Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology Volume 28, 2004 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
650
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

An analysis of medical device-related errors: prevalence and possible solutions

James R Ward Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZCorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
&
P John Clarkson Engineering Design Centre, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ
Pages 2-21 | Published online: 09 Jul 2009

References

  • MEDICAL DEVICES AGENCY, 1998, Medical Devices Agency annual report and accounts, 1997 — 1998. (London: Medical Devices Agency).
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2002, Office of Health and Industry Programs FY2001 annual report. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • KAvE, R., 2000, Human factors in medical device use safety: How to meet the new challenges. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, 2 — 3 August 2002, San Diego, CA. (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society) pp. 550–552.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1999, Managing the risks from medical product use: creating a risk manage-ment framework. Report to the US Food and Drug Administration Commissioner from the task force on risk management. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Adminis-tration).
  • MELDRUM, S. J., 1998, Where do I look for good ideas for my new device? In Medical equipment industry-potential for growth, edited by A. Murray (London: Institution of Electrical Engineers), pp. 17 — 20.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1995, Instructions for completing form 3500A with coding manual for form 3500A. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2001, Office of Health and Industry Programs FY2000 annual report. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • GEDDES, L. A., 1998, Medical device accidents, (Boca Raton: CRC Press).
  • GiuNrim, R. E., 2000, Developing safe, reliable medical devices, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, October. 35, 10–15.
  • HERMAN, W. A., MARLOWE, D. E., and RUDOLP HH., 1998, Future trends in medical device technology: results of an expert survey. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • MEDICAL DEVICES AGENCY, 2001, Medical Devices Agency business plan 2001 — 2002. (London: Medical Devices Agency).
  • LEWIS, C., 2001, Emerging trends in medical device technology. MA Consumer, May —June.
  • BUSSE, D. K., and JoHNsoN, C. W., 1999, Identification and analysis of incidents in complex, medical environments. Ed. Chris Johnson. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Human Error and Clinical Systems, 15–17 April 1999, Glasgow, UK, (Glasgow: Glasgow Accident Analysis Group) pp. 101 —120.
  • MEDICAL DEVICES AGENCY, 2000, Equipped to care: the safe use of medical devices in the 21st century. (London: Medical Devices Agency).
  • LEVESON, N. G., and TURNER, C. S., 1992, An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. University of California, Irvine. Technical Report No. 92–109.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2002, FDA Enforce-ment Report. No. ENF00767. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • SULZER IMPLANT SETTLEMENT, 2002, Final notice of settle-ment of nationwide hip prosthesis and knee prosthesis product liability class action litigation. Report No. MDL Docket No. 1401. Cleveland, OH.
  • DIGGORY, P., FERNANDEZ, C., HUMPHREY, A., JONES, V., and MURPHY, M., 2001, Comparison of elderly people's technique in using two dry powder inhalers to deliver zanamivir: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 322, 1–4.
  • NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCETTENCE, 2000, Technology Appraisal Guidance—No. 8. Guidance on hearing aid technology. (London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence).
  • MDDI, 2001, Human factors Roundtable part II: standards development and implementation issues, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, February 23, 90–100.
  • KOHN, L., CORRIGAN, J., and DONALDSON, M., 1999, To err is human, (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
  • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 2000, An organisation with a memory: report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer. (London: The Stationery Office).
  • VINCENT, C., NEALE, G., and WOLOSHYNOWYCH, M., 2001, Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retro-spective record review. British Medical Journal, 322, 517–519.
  • TAXIS, K., and BARBER, N., 2003, Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors. British Medical Journal, 326, 684–687.
  • VINCENT, C. A., 2000, Presentation at British Medical Journal conference: Reducing Error in Medicine, March 2000, London.
  • http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/news-id_l 308000/1308747.s tm
  • NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE, 2001, Handling clinical negli-gence claims in England. Report No. HC 403, London.
  • BRENNAN, T. A., LEAPE, L. L., LAIRD, N. M., HEBERT, L., LOCALIO, A. R., LAWTHERS, A. G., NEWHOUSE, J. P., WEILER, P. C., and thArr, H. H., 1991, Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients (results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I). New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 370–376.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2000, Medical device use-safety: incorporating human factors engineering into risk management. Document Shelf No. 1497. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2001, Gaps in your postmarket safety net for medical devices. (Presentation). http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/present/dia_jan_2000/ dua jan_2001.html
  • FERRIMAN, A., 1999, UK considers logging adverse in-cidents, British Medical Journal, 319, 212.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1996, 21 CFR Parts 808, 812, and 820. Medical devices; Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP); Final rule. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • SENDERS, J. W., 1994, Medical devices, medical errors, and medical accidents. In Human error in medicine, edited by M. S. Bogner (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 159–177.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1998, Minimizing medical product errors: a systems approach. Workshop. Minimizing medical product errors: a systems approach, January 8, 1998, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • MDDI, 2001, Human factors Roundtable part I: the regulatory perspective, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, January. 23, 158–171.
  • VINCENT, C., TAYLOR-ADAMS, S., and STANHOPE, N., 1998, Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. British Medical Journal, 316, 1154 — 1157.
  • http://www.mdsr.ecri.org/about_MDSR/content.asp
  • https://www.medmarx.com/indexjsp
  • CARSTENSEN, P., 2000, IEC develops standard for medical device human factors design — ensuring a safe device-user interface. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, 2-3 August 2002, San Diego, CA. (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).
  • VINCENT, C. A., 1989, Research into medical accidents: a case of negligence? British Medical Journal, 299, 1150 — 1153.
  • MEDICAL DEVICES AGENCY, 1999, MDA warning notices issued before 1995. Report No. MDA DB 1999(03). London.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2001, Integrating human factors engineering into medical device design and development, National Technical Information Service, US. Video No. AVA20885VNB1.
  • HYMAN, W. A., 1994, Errors in the use of medical equipment. In Human error in medicine, edited by M. S. Bogner (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 327 — 347.
  • ESPINOSA, J. A., and NOLAN, T. W., 2000, Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study. British Medical Journal, 320, 737 — 740.
  • COOPER, J. B., NEWBOWER, R. S., and KITZ, R. J., 1984, An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: Considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology, 60, 34— 42.
  • WEINGART, S. N., WILSON, R. M., GIBBERD, R. W., and HARRISON, B., 2000, Epidemiology of medical error. British Medical Journal, 320, 774–777.
  • LEAPE, L. L., BRENNAN, T. A., LAIRD, N. M., LAWTHERS, A. G., LOCALIO, A. R., BARNES, B. A., HEBERT, L., NEWHOUSEJ P., WEILER, P. C., and HIATT, H. H., 1991, The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients (results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II). New England Journal of Medicine, 324, 377 — 384.
  • AUDIT COMMISSION, 2001, A spoonful of sugar. (London: Audit Commission).
  • MEDICAL DEVICES AGENCY, 2002, Adverse Incident Reports 2001. Report No. MDA DB 2002(01), London.
  • GARDNER, S., and FLACK, M., 1999, Designing a medical device surveillance network—report to congress. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/humfac/hufacpbc.html
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2001, FDA CDRH annual report. Fiscal year 2000. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • COOPER, J. B., NEWBOWER, R. S., LONG, C. D., and MCPEEK, B., 1978, Preventable anesthesia mishaps: A study of human factors. Anesthesiology, 49, 399 — 406.
  • DRIPPS, R. D., LAmoNT, A., and ECKENHOFF, J. E., 1961, The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 178, 261 —266.
  • LEAPE, L. L., 1994, Error in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1851 —1857.
  • CRAIG, J., and WILSON, M. E., 1981, A survey of anaesthetic misadventures. Anaesthesia, 36, 933–936.
  • LUNN, J. N., and MUSHIN, W. W., 1982, Mortality associated with anaesthesia. (London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust).
  • http://www.fda.gov/opacom/enforce.html
  • CRAWLEY, T., 1998, What should I expect from an independent evaluation of my device? In Medical equipment industry —potential for growth, edited by A. Murray (London: Institution of Electrical Engineers), pp. 73— 78.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1990, Device recalls: a study of quality problems. Report No. FDA/CDRH-90/26.
  • MEDICAL DEVICES AGENCY, 2003, Adverse Incident Reports 2002. Report No. MDA, DB 2003(01), London.
  • NORMAN, D. A., 1988, The psychology of everyday things, (New York: Basic Books).
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1999, Design control inspection results: June 1, 1997 to June 1, 1998. http:// www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/dcisresults.html. Accessed 7 March 2003. Updated 5 March 1999.
  • ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION, 2001, ANSI/AAMI HE74-2001 Human factors design process for medical devices. Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumenta-tion.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1996, Do it by design: an introduction to human factors techniques. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • WIKLUND, M. E., 1995, Medical device and equipment design: Usability engineering and ergonomics (Buffalo Grove, IL: Interpharm Press).
  • ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION, 1993, ANSI/AAMI HE48-1993 Human factors engineering guidelines and preferred practices for the design of medical devices.
  • REASON, J., 2000, Human error: models and management. British Medical Journal, 320, 768–770.
  • NOLAN, T. W., 2000, System changes to improve patient safety. British Medical Journal, 320, 771 —773.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2001, General principles of software validation. Report No. 938. (Rock-ville, MD: Food and Drug Administration).
  • WEINGER, M. B., 2000, User-centered design: a clinician's perspective, Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry, 22, 80 — 92.
  • http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/humanfactors/index.html
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1993, Write it right. Recommendations for developing user instruction man-uals for medical devices used in home health care. Report No. FDA 93–4238.
  • http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/designlabel.html
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 2000, Make sure the medical device you choose is designed for you. Report No. 301 443–2436. (Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Adminis-tration).
  • KLATZKY, R. L., KOBER, N. and MAVOR, A. 1996, Safe, comfortable, attractive, and easy to use: Improving the usability of home medical devices. (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
  • FRIES, R., 1997, &liable design of medical devices (New York: Marcel Dekker).
  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, 1999, ISO 13407:1999 Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. Geneva, Switzerland.
  • BIUTISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION, 2000, BS EN ISO 14971:2000 Medical devices —application of risk manage-ment to medical devices. London.
  • US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, 1997, Radiological devices panel meeting, 17 November 1997. http:// www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockers/ac/97/transcript/ 3353t1.pdf
  • http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/hurnfac/hufacdbb.html
  • http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety.htm
  • http://www.mdsr.ecri.org/about_MDSR/content.asp
  • REASON, J., 1990, Human error (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY, 1993, 93/42/EEC Med-ical device directive.
  • CLARKSON, J., ALEXANDER, K., and BISHOP, D., 1999, Observations in medical device design, Part I — current practice. Medical Device Technology, 10, 28— 31.
  • http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/news-id_1281000/1281329.stm
  • Wu, A. W., 2000, Medical error: the second victim. British Medical Journal, 320, 726–727.
  • VINCENT, C., TAYLOR-ADAMS, S., CHAPMAN, E. J., HEWETT, D., PRIOR, S., STRANGE, P., and TIZZARD, A., 2000, How to investigate and analyse critical incidents: clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. British Medical Journal, 320, 777–781.
  • MOORE, W., 2000, Why doctors make mistakes (London: Channel 4 Television).
  • KESSLER, L., 2001, Closing gaps in our postmarket safety net for medical devices: it's everybody's business! (Presentation). US Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/present/FDLI_041801/ fdli_041801.html.
  • WARD, J. R., and CLARKSON, P. J., 2001, Design verification support for the medical device industry. Eds. S. Gulley, A. Duffy, C. McMahon and K. Wallace. (London: Profes-sional Engineering Ltd for the Institution of Mechanical Engineers). Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01, Glasgow, 21–23 August 2001, pp. 211–218.
  • CLARKSON, P. J., 1995, High-Integrity Design for Process Equipment. Cambridge University internal report.
  • RHODES, I., CLARKSON, P. J., and COLVIN, B., 1994, Process development and validation: a positive approach to validation. Medical Device Technology, 5, 26— 30.
  • ALEXANDER, K., and CLARKSON, P. J., 1997, Design for validation of medical devices and equipment. Ed. A. Rittahuhta. (Tampere, Finland: Tampere University of Technology). Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 97, 19–21 August 1997, Tam-pere, pp. 137–142.
  • WARD, J. R., CLARKSON, P. J., and BRACEWELL, R. H., 1999, Supporting medical device verification. Eds. U. Linde-mann, H. Birkofer, H. Meerkamm and S. Vajna. (Garch-ing, Germany: Technische Universitat München). Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 99, 24–26 August 1999, Munich, pp. 429 — 432.
  • ALEXANDER, K., CLARKSON, J., and BISHOP, D., 1999, Observations in medical device design, Part II —good practice. Medical Device Technology, 10, 24–28.
  • ALEXANDER, K., and CLARKSON, P. J., 2000, Good design practice for medical devices and equipment, Part I: a review of current literature. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 24, 5–13.
  • CLARKSON, P. J., BLESSING, L., SHEFELBINE, S., and EASON, S., 1999, Requirements capture. Proceedings of the Spring Medical Device Technology conference, 2–3 March 1999, London, (Chester, UK: Advanstar Communications Ltd) pp. 55–76.
  • ALEXANDER, K., and CLARKSON, P. J., 2000, Good design practice for medical devices and equipment, Part II: design for validation, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 24, 53–62.
  • WARD, J. R., and CLARKSON, P. J., 2000, Device-related medical error —current practice and solutions, The Drug Delivery Companies Report 2001. Commercial opportunities within the drug delivery industry, 58–63.
  • ALEXANDER, K., 1999, Design for validation of medical devices and equipment. Report No. CUED/C-EDC/TR89. Cambridge.
  • ALEXANDER, K., CLARKSON, P. J., BISHOP, D., and Fox, S., 2001, Good design practice for medical devices and equipment— a framework (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Engineer-ing Design Centre/University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing).
  • WARD, J. R., CLARKSON, P. J., BISHOP, D., and Fox, S., 2002, Good design practice for medical devices and equipment— design verification. (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Engi-neering Design Centre/University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing).
  • SHEFELBINE, S., CLARKSON, P. J., FARMER, R., and EASON, S., 2002, Good design practice for medical devices and equipment—requirements capture. (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Engineering Design Centre/University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.