Dynamic infrared imaging in identification of breast cancer tissue with combined image processing and frequency analysis

References

• Berg W. A., Gutierrez L., NessAivor M. S., Carter W. B., Bhargavan M., Lewis R. S., Loffe O. B. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Clinical Examination, US, and MR imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830–849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombardieri E., Gianni L. The choice of the correct imaging modality in breast cancer management. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2004; 31(Suppl. 1)179–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaane P., Kshirsagar A., Stapleton S., Young K., Castellino R. A. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. American Journal of Roentgenology 2007; 188: 377–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy D. H., Mendelson E. B. Incorporating new imaging models in breast cancer management. Current Treatment Options in Oncology 2005; 6: 135–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith A. P., Hall P. A., Marcello D. M. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection. Radiology Management 2004; 26: 16–24, quiz 25–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warner E., Plewes D. B., Shumak R. S., Catzavelos G. C., Di Prospero L. S., Yaffe M. J., Goel V., Ramsay E., Chart P. L., Cole D. E., Taylor G. A., Cutrara M., Samuels T. H., Murphy J. P., Murphy J. M., Narod S. A. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001; 19: 3524–3531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner E., Plewes D. B., Hill K. A., Causer P. A., Zubovits J. T., Jong R. A., Cutrara M. R., DeBoer G., Yaffe M. J., Messner S. J., Meschino W. S., Piron C. A., Naron S. A. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292: 1317–1325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutzler R. K., Rhiem K., Breuer P., Wardelmann E., Lehnert M., Coburger S., Wappenschmidt B. Outcome of structured surveillance programme in women with a familial predisposition for breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 2006; 15: 483–489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen L. L., Miles D. W. Role of nitric oxide in tumour progression: lessons from human tumours. Cancer Metastasis Reviews 1998; 17: 91–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen L. L., Miles D. W., Happerfield L., Bobrow L. G., Knowles R. G., Moncada S. Nitric oxide synthase activity in human breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 1995; 72: 41–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button T. M., Li H., Fisher P., Rosenblatt R., Dulaimy K., Li S., O'Hea B., Salvitti M., Geronimo V., Geronimo C., Jambawalikar S., Weiss R. Dynamic infrared imaging for the detection of malignancy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2004; 49: 3105–3116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicek M. J., Demetri G., Janicek M. R., Shaffer K., Fauci M. A. Dynamic infrared imaging of newly diagnosed malignant lymphoma compared with gallium-67 and fluorina-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Technology in Research & Treatment 2003; 2: 571–577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbar M. Hyperthermia of the cancerous breast: analysis of mechanism. Cancer Letters 1994; 84: 23–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbar M., Brown C., Milescu L. Objective identification of cancerous breasts by dynamic area telethermometry (DAT). Thermology International 1999; 9: 127–133
   Google Scholar
• Anbar M., Milescu L., Naumov A., Brown C., Button T., Carty C., Dulaimy K. Detection of cancerous breasts by dynamic area telethermometry. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 2001; 20: 80–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mital M., Scott E. P. Thermal detection of embedded tumors using infrared imaging. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2007; 129: 33–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromberg B. J., Cerussi A., Shah N., Compton M., Durkin A., Hsiang D., Butler J., Mehta R. Imaging in breast cancer: diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Research 2005; 7: 279–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joro R., Lääperi A.-L., Dastidar P., Soimakallio S., Kuukasjärvi T., Toivonen T., Saaristo R., Järvenpää R. Imaging of breast cancer with mid- and long-wave infrared camera. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology 2007, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein M. J., Poller D. N., Waisman J. R., Colburn W. J., Barth A., Gierson E. D., Lewinsky B., Gamagami P., Slamon D. J. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. The Lancet 1995; 345(8958)1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli F. A., Devilee P. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours Pathology & Genetics Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. IARC Press, Lyon 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bloom H. J., Richardson W. W. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. British Journal of Cancer 1957; 11: 359–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston C. W., Ellis I. O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19: 403–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales R. C., Woods R. E., Eddins S. L. Digital Image Processing using Matlab®. Pearson Education, New Jersey 2004; 65–193
   Google Scholar
• The MathWorks, Inc. Image Processing Toolbox User's Guide, version 5. The MathWorks, Natick 2005; 50–150
   Google Scholar
• Singletary S. E. Multidisciplinary frontiers in breast cancer management. A surgeon's perspective (published online 12 February 2007). Cancer 2007; 109(6)1019–1029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright T., McGechan A. Breast cancer: new technologies for risk assessments and diagnosis. Molecular Diagnosis 2003; 7: 49–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang L. J., Ng E. Y., Yeo A. C., Wu S., Pan F., Yau W. Y., Chen J. H., Yang Y. A perspective on medical infrared imaging. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 2005; 29: 257–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng E. Y., Fok S. C., Peh Y. C., Ng F. C., Sim L. S. Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 2002; 26: 152–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griebsch I., Brown J., Boggis C., Dixon A., Dixon M., Easton D., Eeles R., Evans D. G., Gilbert F. J., Hawnaur J., Kessar P., Lakhani S. R., Moss S. M., Nerurkar A., Padhani A. R., Pointon L. J., Potterton J., Thompson D., Turnbull L. W., Walker L. G., Warren R., Leach M. O., for the UK Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Screening (MARIBS) Study group. Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer 2006; 95: 801–810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lääperi A.-L. Cost-accounting of radiological examinations: cost analysis of intermediate referral hospitals and general practice. Acta Radiologica (Suppl 1996) 1996; 407(37)1–54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lääperi A.-L., Paakkala T., Kallio T., Mäkelä L., Koivisto E. Cost accounting for evaluation and planning of radiological resources. Academic Radiology 1998; 5: 283–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar