References
- Weinberg E, Kaazempur Mofrad M. A finite shell element for heart mitral valve leaflet mechanics with large deformations and 3D constitutive material model. J Biomech. 2007;40:705–711.
- Weinberg E, Kaazempur Mofrad M. A large-strain finite element formulation for biological tissues with application to mitral valve leaflet tissue mechanics. J Biomech. 2006;39:1557–1561.
- Weinberg E, Kaazempur Mofrad M. A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. J Biomech. 2008;41:3482–3487.
- Weinberg E, Kaazempur Mofrad M. Hemodynamic environments from opposing sides of human aortic valve leaflets evokes distinct endothelial phenotypes in vitro. Cardiovasc Eng. 2010;10:5–11.
- Weinberg E, Kaazempur Mofrad M. Transient, three-dimensional, multiscale simulations of the human aortic valve. Cardiovasc Eng. 2007;7:140–155.
- Fisher C, Chen J. Calcific nodule morphogenesis by heart valve interstitial cells is strain dependent. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2013;12:5–17.
- Kim S. Nonlinear multi-scale anisotropic material and structural models for prosthetic and native aortic heart valves. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2009.
- Thubrikar MJ. The aortic valve. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1990.
- Maleki H, Shahriari SH. An in vitro model of aortic stenosis for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136:054501–054504.
- Katayama S, Umetani N. Bicuspid aortic valves undergo excessive strain during opening: a simulation study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:1570–1576.
- Chandra S, Rajamannan N. Computational assessment of bicuspid aortic valve wall-shear stress, implications for calcific aortic valve disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2012;11:1085–1096.
- Nerem R, Seed A. An in vivo study of aortic flow disturbances. J Cardiovasc Res. 1972;6:1–14.
- Haj-Ali R, Marom G. A general three-dimensional parametric geometry of the native aortic valve and root for biomechanical modelling. J Biomech. 2012;45:2392–2397.
- Halevi R, Hamdan A. Progressive aortic valve calcification: three-dimensional visualization and biomechanical analysis. J Biomech. 2015;48:489–497.
- Swanson M, Clark RE. Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. J Circ Res. 1974;35:871–882.
- Billiar K, Sacks. Biaxial mechanical properties of the natural and glutaraldehyde treated aortic valve cusp. Part II. A structural constitutive model. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122:327–335.
- Caruthers SD, Lin SJ. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis comparison with echocardiography. Circulation. 2003;108:2236–2243.
- McCulloch AD. The biomedical engineering handbook: cardiac biomechanics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000.
- Otto CM. Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2141–2151.
- ADINA, theory and modelling guide, CFD and FSI, chapter 9; 2012.
- Conti C, Votta E. Dynamic finite element analysis of the aortic root from MRI-derived parameters. Med Eng Phys. 2010;32:212–221.
- Grande-Allen KJ, Cochran RP. Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry. Ann Biomed Eng. 1998;26:534–545.
- Moss R. Multimodality imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Chapter 12, Echocardiographic evaluation of aortic stenosis. London (UK): Springer; 2013. p. 157–169.
- Lauten J, Rost C. Invasive hemodynamic characteristics of low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;61:1799–1808.
- Villavicencio E, Forebs J. Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2003;24:457–462.
- Baumgartner H, Hung J. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practise. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1–23.