Stress distribution on short implants with different designs: a photoelastic analysis

References

• Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, et al. Five year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective studies. J Periodontol. 2008;79:42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991;62:2–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, et al. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Capelli M, et al. Immediate occlusal loading and tilted implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: 1-year interim results of a multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, et al. Biological outcome of implant supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part 1: a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snauwaert K, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, et al. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4:13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, et al. The influence of medial implant location in three-unit posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures on stress distribution in surrounding mandibular bone. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2002;69:263–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misch CE. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dent Today. 2005;24:64–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:417–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapasco M, Ferrini F, Casentini P, et al. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1–3-year multicenter follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, et al. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: a 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:691–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer K, Stenberg T. Three-year data from a randomizd, controlled study of early loading of single-stage dental implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:245–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, et al. Long-term clinical effectiveness of oral implants in the treartment of partial edentulism. Seven year life table analysis of a prospective study with ITI® dental implant system used for single tooth restoration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:133–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stellingsma C, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Use of short endosseous implants and an overdenture in the extremely resorbed mandible: a five-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:382–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar FA, Jr, Tiossi R, Macedo AP, et al. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:2019–2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallucci GO, Doughtie CB, Hwang JW, et al. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojic LT, Milic AL, Tanasic I, et al. Compressive strains and displacement in a partially dentate lower jaw rehabilitated with two different treatment modalities. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e851–e857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Ferraco R, et al. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, et al. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:106009. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.10.106009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Prado Ribeiro P, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, et al. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:797–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzer EP, Carli RI, Falcon-Antenucci RM, et al. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, et al. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:061203. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.061203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiato MC, do Prado Ribeiro P, Pellizzer EP, et al. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:757–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiato MC, do Prado Ribeiro P, Pellizzer EP, et al. Photoelastic analysis to compare implant-retained and conventional obturator dentures. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:061203. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.6.061203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Prado Ribeiro P, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, et al. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:523–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, et al. Short implants: an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:894–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:184–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiato MC, Pesqueira AA, Falcon-Antenucci RM, et al. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhary R, Halldin A, Jimbo R, et al. Evaluation of stress pattern generated through various thread designs of dental implants loaded in a condition of immediately after placement and on osseointegration: an FEA study. Implant Dent. 2013;22:91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech. 2003;36:1247–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso MV, Vandamme K, Chaudhari A, et al. Dental implant macro-design features can impact the dynamics of osseointegration. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;17:639–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai SR, Desai MS, Katti G, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of eight dental implant designs: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Niger J Clin Pract. 2012;15:176–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misch CE, Bidez MW, Sharawy M. A bioengineered implant for a predetermined bone cellular response to loading forces. A literature review and case report. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1276–1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadkhodazadeh M, Lafzi A, Raoofi S, et al. Comparison of the effects of different implant apical designs on the magnitude and distribution of stress and strain in bone: a finite element analysis study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2014;24:109–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gehrke SA, da Silva Neto UT, Del Fabro M. Does implant design affect implant primary stability? A resonance frequency analysis-based randomized split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Implantol. 2014;41:e281–e286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeie D, Klokkevold PR, Caputo AA. Effect of implant diameter and ridge dimension on stress distribution in mandibular first molar sites-a photoelastic study. J Oral Implantol. 2014;41:e165–e173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:35–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar