Long-term gait pattern assessment using a tri-axial accelerometer

References

• Wang N, Redmond SJ, Ambikairajah E, et al. Can triaxial accelerometry accurately recognize inclined walking terrains? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:2506–2516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang N, Ambikairajah E, Celler BG, et al. Accelerometry based classification of gait patterns using empirical mode decomposition. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2008 (ICASSP 2008). 2008. p. 617–620.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Karunanithi M, Bradford D, et al. Activity of daily living assessment through wireless sensor data. 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2014. p. 1752–1755.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Ambikairajah K, Celler EB, et al. Gait patterns classification using spectral features. IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC 2008). 2008. p. 98–102.
   Google Scholar
• De Cillis F. Inertial sensing for human activity recognition and personal indoor localization [PhD thesis]. Italy: Universita’Campus Bio-Medico di Roma; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Yang M, Zheng H, Wang H, et al. Statistical and machine learning approach to assessing the environmental impact on walking patterns. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW). 2014. p. 231–235.
   Google Scholar
• Muro-de-la Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A. Gait analysis methods: an overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14:3362–3394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ní Scanaill C, Carew S, Barralon P, et al. A review of approaches to mobility telemonitoring of the elderly in their living environment. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34:547–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi B, Aminian K, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, et al. Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50:711–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khusainov R, Azzi D, Achumba IE, et al. Real-time human ambulation, activity, and physiological monitoring: taxonomy of issues, techniques, applications, challenges and limitations. Sensors (Basel). 2013;13:12852–12902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shany T, Redmond SJ, Narayanan MR, et al. Sensors-based wearable systems for monitoring of human movement and falls. IEEE Sensors J. 2012;12:658–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell NH, Wang N, Ambikairajah E, et al. Accelerometry based classification of walking patterns using time-frequency analysis. 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007 (EMBS 2007). 2007. p. 4899–4902.
   Google Scholar
• Lombriser C, Bharatula NB, Roggen D, et al. On-body activity recognition in a dynamic sensor network. Proceedings of the ICST 2nd International Conference on Body Area Networks, BodyNets ’07. 2007. p. 171–176.
   Google Scholar
• Bao L, Intille SS. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Springer, 2004. p. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pirttikangas S, Fujinami K, Nakajima T. Feature selection and activity recognition from wearable sensors. In: Hee Yong Y, Minkoo K, Hiroyuki M, editors. Ubiquitous computing systems, volume 4239 of lecture notes in computer science. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2006. p. 516–527.
   Google Scholar
• Kugler P, Jaremenko C, Schlachetzki J, et al. Automatic recognition of Parkinson’s disease using surface electromyography during standardized gait tests. 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2013. p. 5781–5784.
   Google Scholar
• Parkka J, Ermes M, Korpipaa P, et al. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 2006;10:119–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barralon P, Noury N, Vuillerme N. Classification of daily physical activities from a single kinematic sensor. 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE-EMBS), 2005. p. 2447–2450.
   Google Scholar
• Karantonis DM, Narayanan MR, Mathie M, et al. Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed. 2006;10:156–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sejdic E, Lowry KA, Bellanca J, et al. A comprehensive assessment of gait accelerometry signals in time, frequency and time-frequency domains. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22:603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millecamps A, Lowry KA, Brach JS, et al. Understanding the effects of pre-processing on extracted signal features from gait accelerometry signals. Comput Biol Med. 2015;62:164–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguita D, Ghio A, Oneto L, et al. Energy efficient smartphone-based activity recognition using fixed-point arithmetic. J UCS. 2013;19:1295–1314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cola G, Avvenuti M, Vecchio A, et al. An on-node processing approach for anomaly detection in gait. IEEE Sensors J. 2015;15:6640–6649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung W-C, Shen F, Wu Y-L, et al. Activity recognition with sensors on mobile devices. 2014 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC), volume 2, 2014. p. 449–454.
   Google Scholar
• San-Segundo R, Lorenzo-Trueba J, Martínez-González B, et al. Segmenting human activities based on hmms using smartphone inertial sensors. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 2016;30:84–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim R, Ambikairajah KE, Celler BG, Lovell NH. Time-frequency based features for classification of walking patterns. 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing. 2007. p. 187–190.
   Google Scholar
• Avci A, Bosch S, Marin-Perianu M, et al. Activity recognition using inertial sensing for healthcare, wellbeing and sports applications: a survey. 23rd International Conference on Architecture of Computing Systems (ARCS); Feb 22–25, 2010, Hannover, Germany. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Banos O, Galvez J-M, Damas M, et al. Window size impact in human activity recognition. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14:6474–6482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulling A, Blanke U, Schiele B. A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Comput Surv. 2014;46:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin D, Shultz SJ, Houglum P. Examination of musculoskeletal injuries. 3rd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2009. ISBN-10: 0736076220; ISBN-13: 978-0736076227
   Google Scholar
• Wang J-S, Lin C-W, Yang Y-TC, et al. Walking pattern classification and walking distance estimation algorithms using gait phase information. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59:2884–2892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouten CVC, Koekkoek KTM, Verduin M, et al. A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997;44:136–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar