Dynamic finite element simulation of dental prostheses during chewing using muscle equivalent force and trajectory approaches

References

• Wu T, Liao W, Dai N, et al. Design of a custom angled abutment for dental implants using computer-aided design and nonlinear finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2010;43:1941–1946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali B, Meddah HM, Merdji A. Effects of overloading in mastication on the mechanical behaviour of dental implants. Mater Design. 2013;47:210–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pileicikiene G, Surna A, Barauskas R, et al. Finite element analysis of stresses in the maxillary and mandibular dental arches and TMJ articular discs during clenching into maximum intercuspation, anterior and unilateral posterior occlusion. Stomatologija. 2007;9:121–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asundi A, Kishen A. A strain gauge and photoelastic analysis of in vivo strain and in vitro stress distribution in human dental supporting structures. Arch Oral Biol. 2000;45:543–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:104–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobkirk J, Wiskott H. Biomechanical aspects of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:52–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer U, Vollmer D, Runte C, et al. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2001;29:100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrisnard L, Hure G, Barquins M, et al. Two dental implants designed for immediate loading: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;17:353–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian L, Todo M, Matsushita Y, et al. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;24:877–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullana A. Anatomically based modelling of the human skull and jaw. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180:44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolstra J, Van Eijden T. A method to predict muscle control in the kinematically and mechanically indeterminate human masticatory system. J Biomech. 2001;34:1179–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trainor P, McLachlan K, McCall W. Modelling of forces in the human masticatory system with optimization of the angulations of the joint loads. J Biomech. 1995;28:829–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergland O. The bony nasopharynx. a roentgen-craniometric study. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1962;21(Suppl 35):1–137.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Akyuz U, Xu L, et al. Stress analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. Med Eng Phys. 1998;20:565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Xu L. A finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint. J Biomech Eng. 1994;116:401–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donzelli PS, Gallo LM, Spilker RL, et al. Biphasic finite element simulation of the TMJ disc from in vivo kinematic and geometric measurements. J Biomech. 2004;37:1787–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka E, Del Pozo R, Tanaka M, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of human temporomandibular joint with and without disc displacement during jaw opening. Med Eng Phys. 2004;26:503–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korioth T, Hannam A. Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching. J Dent Res. 1994;73:56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu K, Qiguo R, Fang J, et al. Effects of condylar fibrocartilage on the biomechanical loading of the human temporomandibular joint in a three-dimensional, nonlinear finite element model. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25:107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannam AG, Stavness I, Lloyd JE, et al. A dynamic model of jaw and hyoid biomechanics during chewing. J Biomech. 2008;41:1069–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayabaşı O, Yüzbasıoğlu E, Erzincanlı F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Adv Eng Software. 2006;37:649–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merdji A, Bouiadjra BB, Chikh BO, et al. Stress distribution in dental prosthesis under an occlusal combined dynamic loading. Mater Design. 2012;36:705–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Razaghi R, Navidbakhsh M, et al. Computing the influences of different intraocular pressures on the human eye components using computational fluid-structure interaction model. Technol Health Care. Forthcoming. [13 p.]. DOI: 10.3233/THC-161280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Razaghi R, Navidbakhsh M, et al. Dynamic finite element simulation of the gunshot injury to the human forehead protected by polyvinyl alcohol sponge. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Razaghi R. An experimental-finite element analysis on the kinetic energy absorption capacity of polyvinyl alcohol sponge. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;39:253–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Razaghi R, Navidbakhsh M, et al. Computing the stresses and deformations of the human eye components due to a high explosive detonation using fluid–structure interaction model. Injury. 2016;47:1042–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Razaghi R. Dynamic simulation and finite element analysis of the human mandible injury protected by polyvinyl alcohol sponge. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;42:608–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi‐Adl A, Dammak M, Paiement G. Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moller E. The chewing apparatus. An electromyographic study of the action of the muscles of mastication and its correlation to facial morphology. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1966;280:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannam AG, Wood WW. Medial pterygoid muscle activity during the closing and compressive phases of human mastication. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1981;55:359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray G, Phanachet I, Uchida S, et al. The human lateral pterygoid muscle: a review of some experimental aspects and possible clinical relevance. Aust Dental J. 2004;49:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray GM, Bhutada M, Peck CC, et al. The human lateral pterygoid muscle. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52:377–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. The transfer of occlusal forces through the maxillary molars: a finite element study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross MD, Arbel G, Hershkovitz I. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the facial skeleton on simulated occlusal loading. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:684–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes de Oliveira S, Seraidarian P, Landre J, et al. Tooth displacement due to occlusal contacts: a three‐dimensional finite element study. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:874–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpinar I, Anil N, Parnas L. A natural tooth's stress distribution in occlusion with a dental implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:538–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschian Pest L, Guidotti S, Pietrabissa R, et al. Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:690–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose M, Tanaka E, Tanaka M, et al. Three‐dimensional finite‐element model of the human temporomandibular joint disc during prolonged clenching. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razaghi R, Mallakzadeh M, Haghpanahi M. Dynamic simulation and finite element analysis of the maxillary bone injury around dental implant during chewing different food. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun. 2016;28:1650014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korioth T, Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Critic Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8:90–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scacchi M, Merz BR, Schär AR. The development of the ITI® dental implant system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:22–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol. 1996;23:104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on treatment plans, surgical approach, healing, and progressive Boen loading. Int J Oral Implantol. 1989;6:23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Van Staden RC, Guan H, Johnson NW, et al. Step‐wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:303–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshaw SJ. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:345–360.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran DL. The scientific basis for and clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI® Dental Implant System: a consensus report Note. Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:33–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, et al. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, et al. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar