References
- Roy J-S, MacDermid JC, Orton B, et al. The concurrent validity of a hand-held versus a stationary dynamometer in testing isometric shoulder strength. J Hand Ther. 2009;22:320–326.
- O’Brien M. Aids to the examination of peripheral nervous system. Maryland Heights (MO): Saunders/Elsevier; 2010.
- Van Harlinger W, Blalock L, Merritt JL. Upper limb strength: study providing normative data for a clinical handheld dynamometer. PM R. 2015;7:135–140.
- Yen-Mou L, Yi-Jing L. In: Madhuri Hegde (ed) Strength and functional measurement for patients with muscular dystrophy, muscular dystrophy. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2012. DOI: 10.5772/31970. Available from: https://www.intech-open.com/books/muscular-dystrophy/strength-decrease-pattern-and-functional-measurement-for-patients-with-muscular-dystrophy
- Shahgholi L, Bengtson KA, Bishop AT, et al. A comparison of manual and quantitative elbow strength testing. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:856–862.
- MacAvoy MC, Green DP. Critical reappraisal of Medical Research Council muscle testing for elbow flexion. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:149–153.
- Marshall RW, Williams DH, Birch R, et al. Operations to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:577–582.
- Liverneaux PA, Diaz LC, Beaulieu J-Y, et al. Preliminary results of double nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion in upper type brachial plexus palsies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:915–919.
- Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Heise CO, et al. A prospective study comparing single and double fascicular transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:709–714. 714–715.
- Carlsen BT, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, et al. Comparison of single versus double nerve transfers for elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:269–276.
- Baltzopoulos V, Williams JG, Brodie DA. Sources of error in isokinetic dynamometry: effects of visual feedback on maximum torque. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1991;13:138–142.
- Masmejean EH, Asfazadourian H, Alnot JY. Brachial plexus injuries in scapulothoracic dissociation. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25:336–340.
- Brucker PU, Gruen GS, Kaufmann RA. Scapulothoracic dissociation: evaluation and management. Injury. 2005;36:1147–1155.
- Wankhar S, Devasahayam S, Babu S. A novel magnetic stimulator using parallel excited coils and capable of high frequency stimulation. J Med Dev. 2013;8:011006–011006-9.
- Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1990. p. 51–52.
- Dvir Z. Grade 4 in manual muscle testing: the problem with submaximal strength assessment. Clin Rehabil. 1997;11:36–41.
- James MA. Use of the Medical Research Council muscle strength grading system in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32:154–156.
- Bohannon RW, Corrigan D. A broad range of forces is encompassed by the maximum manual muscle test grade of five. Percept Mot Skills. 2000;90:747–750.
- Knepler C, Bohannon RW. Subjectivity of forces associated with manual-muscle test grades of 3+, 4–, and 4. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;87:1123–1128.
- Bohannon RW. Intertester reliability of hand-held dynamometry: a concise summary of published research. Percept Mot Skills. 1999;88:899–902.