Pre-clinical evaluation of the mechanical properties of a low-stiffness cement-injectable hip stem

References

• Michelson JD, Riley LH. Considerations in the comparison of cemented and cementless total hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:327–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothman RH, Cohn JC. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: A critical review. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1990;254:153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ni GX, Lu WW, Chiu KY, et al. Cemented or uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement? A review from a clinical and radiological perspective. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13:96–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsson E, Goldie I, Wykman A. Total hip replacement. A comparison between cemented (Charnley) and non-cemented (HP Garches) fixation by clinical assessment and objective gait analysis. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18:107–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wykman A, Olsson E, Axdorph G, et al. Total hip arthroplasty. A comparison between cemented and press-fit noncemented fixation. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:19–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al. Comparison of total hip arthroplasty performed with and without cement. a Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1823–1828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RB, Corten K. Cemented versus cementless stems: a verdict is in. Orthopedics. 2010;33:638
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennington M, Grieve R, Sekhon JS, et al. Cemented, cementless, and hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: Cost effectiveness analysis. Br Med J. 2013;346:f1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves SE, Davidson D, Steiger RD, et al. The Australian orthopaedic association national joint replacement registry, annual report 2015, [cited 2016 Jan 24]. Available from: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2015
   Google Scholar
• Green M, Gregg P, Porter M, Price A, et al. 12th annual report, National joint registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland: 2015, [cited 2016 Jan 24] Available from: http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports,PublicationsandMinutes/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell A, Devane P, Mohammed K, et al. 16th annual report, New Zealand joint registry report, 2014, [cited 2016 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.nzoa.org.nz/nz-joint-registry.
   Google Scholar
• Knezovich JP, Lewallen DG, Etkin CD, et al. American joint replacement registry, annual report, 2014, [cited 2016 Jan 24]. Available from: http://www.ajrr.net/images/annual_reports/AJRR_2014_Annual_Report_final_11-11-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe S, Ji H, Molodianovitsh K, et al. Hip and knee replacements in Canada, Canadian joint replacement registry, annual report, 2015, [cited 2016 Jan 24] Available from: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/CJRR_2015_Annual_Report_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hailer NP, Garellick G, Kärrholm J. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: evaluation of 170,413 operations. Acta Orthopaedica. 2010;81:34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Stringer M, et al. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:451–458.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Toni A. Initial stability of a new hybrid fixation hip stem: Experimental measurement of implant-bone micromotion under torsional load in comparison with cemented and cementless stems. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:605–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viceconti M, Cristofolini L, Baleani M, et al. Pre-clinical validation of a new partially cemented femoral prosthesis by synergetic use of numerical and experimental methods. J Biomech. 2001;34:723–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa F, Panayiotou P, Tomlinson G. Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2000;35:383–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi M, Scarpa FL, Smith CW. Stiffness and energy dissipation in polyurethane auxetic foams. J Mater Sci. 2008;43:5851–5860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezazi A, Scarpa F. Mechanical behaviour of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading. Int J Fatigue. 2007;29:922–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Harrysson O, West H, et al. Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing. Int J Solids Struct. 2015;69:475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinl P, Rottmair A, Körner C, et al. Cellular titanium by selective electron beam melting. Adv Eng Mater. 2007;9:360–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhavar V, Kattire P, Patil V, et al. A review on powder bed fusion technology of metal additive manufacturing. International Conference & Exhibition on Additive Manufacturing Technologies Bangalore, India; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Harrysson OLA, Cansizoglu O, Marcellin-Little DJ, et al. Direct metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technology. Mater Sci Eng C. 2008;28:366–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcam EBM system, Ti6Al4V ELI Titanium Alloy, [cited 2016 March 7]. Available from: http://www.arcam.com/wp-content/uploads/Arcam-Ti6Al4V-ELI-Titanium-Alloy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Marin E, Fusi S, Pressacco M, et al. Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: trabecular titanium. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010;3:373–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timoshenko S, Goodier J. Theory of elasticity. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Papini M, Trépanier CD, Third generation composite femur. Biomechanics European Laboratory: The BEL Repository. [cited 2016 April 1] Available from: https://www.biomedtown.org/biomed_town/LHDL/Reception/datarepository/repositories/BelRepWikiPages/3rdGenerationCompositeFemurASolidModel
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlikowski M, Skalski K, Haraburda M. Process of hip joint prosthesis design including bone remodeling phenomenon. Comput Struct. 2003;81:887–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng L, Bai J, Zeng X, et al. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys. 2006;28:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials. 2003;24:2161–2175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancourt D, Shirazi-Adl A, Drouin G, et al. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:1503–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai R, Takahashi A, Takahira N, et al. Hammering force during cementless total hip arthroplasty and risk of microfracture. Hip. 2011;21:330–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simões JA, Marques AT. Design of a composite hip femoral prosthesis. Mater Des. 2005;26:391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Santis R, Ambrosio L, Nicolais L. Polymer-based composite hip prostheses. J Inorg Biochem. 2000;79:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trebse R, Milosev I, Kovac S, et al. Poor results from the isoelastic total hip replacement: 14-17-year follow-up of 149 cementless prostheses. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:169–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam F, Hammer DS, Pfautsch S, et al. Early failure of a press-fit carbon fiber hip prosthesis with a smooth surface. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:217–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcellin-Little DJ, Cansizoglu O, Harrysson OLA, et al. In vitro evaluation of a low-modulus mesh canine prosthetic hip stem. Am J Vet Res. 2010;71:1089–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison N, Field JR, Quondamatteo F, et al. Preclinical trial of a novel surface architecture for improved primary fixation of cementless orthopaedic implants. Clin Biomech. 2014;29:861–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi K, Masuhara K, Ohzono K, et al. Evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the extent of porous coating. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1426–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown PW, Chow LC, A new calcium phosphate, water-setting cement. In: Brown PW, editor, Westerville, Ohio: Cements Research Progress, American Ceramic Society; 1987. p. 352–379.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenaga M, Hardouin P, Lemaître J, et al. Biomechanical characterization of a biodegradable calcium phosphate hydraulic cement: a comparison with porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munting E, Mirtchi AA, Lemaitre J. Bone repair of defects filled with a phosphocalcic hydraulic cement: an in vivo study. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1993;4:337–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohura K, Bohner M, Hardouin P, et al. Resorption of, and bone formation from, new beta-tricalcium phosphate-monocalcium phosphate cements: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30:193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruyama M. Hydroxyapatite-clay bone fixation for loaded implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29:683–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantz BR, Ison IC, Fulmer MT, et al. Skeletal repair by in situ formation of the mineral phase of bone. Science. 1995;267:1796–1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildhauer TA, Bauer TW, Josten C, et al. Open reduction and augmentation of internal fixation with an injectable skeletal cement for the treatment of complex calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JCJ, Spencer RF. The role of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement in modern orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Implants for surgery – Acrylic bone cements”, ISO5833, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gbureck U, Barralet JE, Spatz K, et al. Ionic modification of calcium phosphate cement viscosity. Part I: Hypodermic injection and strength improvement of apatite cement. Biomaterials 2004;25:2187–2195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambard AJ, Mueninghoff L. Calcium phosphate cement: Review of mechanical and biological properties. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:321–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hribar G, Žnidaršič A, Maver U, Calcium phosphate as a biomaterial and its use in biomedical applications. In: Akita D, Iwate C, editors. Phosphates: sources, properties and applications. Nova Science Publishers; 2012. p. 43–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy EA, Hurst WJ, Stitzel JD, et al. Lateral and posterior dynamic bending of the mid-shaft femur: fracture risk curves for the adult population. Stapp Car Crash J. 2004;48:27–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oshkour AA, Osman NA, Yau YH, et al. Design of new generation femoral prostheses using functionally graded materials: a finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2013;227:3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharuddin MY, Salleh SH, Zulkifly AH, et al. Design process of cementless femoral stem using a nonlinear three dimensional finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougherara H, Zdero R, Shah S, et al. A biomechanical assessment of modular and monoblock revision hip implants using FE analysis and strain gage measurements. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei F, Hassani K, Solhjoei N, et al. Carbon/PEEK composite materials as an alternative for stainless steel/titanium hip prosthesis: a finite element study. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015;38:569–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar