3D bio-printing technology for body tissues and organs regeneration

References

• Singh D, Han SS. 3D printing of scaffold for cells delivery: advances in skin tissue engineering. Polymers. 2016;8:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia HN, Wu BM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 2015;9:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baradaran-Rafii A, Biazar E, Heidari-keshel S, et al. Oriented nanofibrous silk as a natural scaffold for ocular epithelial regeneration. J Biomat Sci-Polym E. 2015;26:1139–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai J, Heidari SK, Ghorbani F, et al. Fabrication of coated-collagen electrospun PHBV nanofiber film by plasma method; and its cellular study. J Nanomater. 2011;2011:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebalzamani M, Biazar E, Shahrezaei M, et al. Surface modification of PHBV nanofibrous mat by laminin protein and its cellular study. Int J Polym Mater Po. 2015;64:149–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahebalzamani A, Biazar E. Modification of poly caprolactone nanofibrous mat by laminin protein and its cellular study. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2014;4:423–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momenzadeh D, Baradaran-Rafii A, Heidari SK, et al. Electrospun mat with eyelid fat-derived stem cells as a scaffold for ocular epithelial regeneration. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45:120–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majdi A, Biazar E, Heidari S. Fabrication and comparison of electro-spun poly hydroxy butyrate valrate nanofiber and normal film and its cellular study. Oriental J Chem. 2011;27:523–528.
   Google Scholar
• Baradaran-Rafii A, Biazar E, Heidari-keshel S. Cellular response of Limbal stem cells on PHBV/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for ocular epithelial regeneration. Int J Polym Mater Po. 2015;64:879–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baradaran-Rafii A, Biazar E, Heidari-keshel S. Cellular response of stem cells on nanofibrous scaffold for ocular surface bioengineering. ASAIO J. 2015;61:605–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baradaran-Rafii A, Biazar E, Heidari-keshel S. Cellular response of Limbal stem cells on polycaprolactone nanofibrous scaffolds for ocular epithelial regeneration. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41:326–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baradaran-Rafii A, Biazar E, Heidari-keshel S. Cellular response of Limbal stem cells on poly(hydroxybuthyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) porous scaffolds for ocular surface bioengineering. Int J Polym Mater Po. 2015;64:815–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S, Sahebalzamani A, et al. The healing effect of unrestricted somatic stem cells loaded in nanofibrous Polyhydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate scaffold on full-thickness skin defects. J Biomat Tissue Eng. 2014;4:20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari S, Biazar E, Rezaei M, et al. The healing effect of unrestricted somatic stem cells loaded in collagen-modified nanofibrous PHBV scaffold on full-thickness skin defects. Artif Cell Nanomed B. 2014;42:210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S. Effects of chitosan cross linked nanofibrous PHBV scaffold combined with mesenchymal stem cells on healing of full-thickness skin defects. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9:1471–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamuditha NS, Green BJ, Altamentova SM, et al. A microfluidic device designed to induce media flow throughout pancreatic islets while limiting shear-induced damage. Lab Chip. 2013;13:4374–4384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh D, Torisawa YS, Hamilton GA, et al. Microengineered physiological biomimicry: organs-on-chips. Lab Chip. 2012;12:2156–2164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:773–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther A, Yasotharan S, Vagaon A, et al. A microfluidic platform for probing small artery structure and function. Lab Chip. 2010;10:2341–2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mironov V, Reis N, Derby B. Review: bioprinting: a beginning. Tissue Eng. 2006;12:631–634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rezende RA, Selishchev SV, Kasyanov VA, et al. An organ biofabrication line: enabling technology for organ printing. Part 2: from encapsulator to biofabrication line. Biomed Eng. 2013;47:213–218.
   Google Scholar
• Lee VK, Dai G. Three-dimensional bioprinting and tissue fabrication: prospects for drug discovery and regenerative medicine. Adv Health Care Technol. 2015;1:23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbolat I, Yu Y. Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013;60:691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudapati H, Yan J, Huang Y, et al. Alginate gelation-induced cell death during laser-assisted cell printing. Biofabrication. 2014;6:035022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Mochalin VN, Neitzel I, et al. Fluorescent PLLA-nanodiamond composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32:87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schantz JT, Brandwood A, Hutmacher DW, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells in computer designed fibrin–polymer–ceramic scaffolds manufactured by fused deposition modeling. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2005;16:807–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel LA, Rath SN, Maier AK, et al. Induction of bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and primary osteoblasts. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014;8:176–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinand C, Gupta R, Weinberg E. Toward regenerating. A Human Thumb in Situ. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:2605–2615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple JP, Hutton DL, Hung BP. Engineering anatomically shaped vascularized bone grafts with hASCs and 3D-printed PCL scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:4317–4325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16:496–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Buchanan F, Mitchell C, et al. Printability of calcium phosphate: calcium sulfate powders for the application of tissue engineered bone scaffolds using the 3D printing technique. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;38:1e10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann M, Lindner W, Zhang K, et al. 3D printing of bone substitute implants using calcium phosphate and bioactive glasses. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2010;30:2563–2567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM, et al. 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4026–4034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao CT, Lin CC, Chen YW, et al. Poly(dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;56:165–e173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao G, Schilling AF, Yonezawa T, et al. Bioactive nanoparticles stimulate bone tissue formation in bioprinted three-dimensional scaffold and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biotechnol J. 2014;9:1304–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keriquel V, Guillemot F, Arnault I, et al. In vivo bioprinting for computer- and robotic-assisted medical intervention: preliminary study in mice. Biofabrication. 2010;2:14101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorovich NE, De Wijn JR, Verbout AJ, et al. Three-dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng A. 2008;14:127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippi JA, Miller E, Weiss L, et al. Microenvironments engineered by inkjet bioprinting spatially direct adult stem cells toward muscle- and bone-like subpopulations. Stem Cells. 2008;26:127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlfeld T, Cidonio G, Kilian D, et al. Development of a clay based bioink for 3D cell printing for skeletal application. Biofabrication. 2017;9:034103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenholm P, Martinez H, Karabulut E, et al. Development of nanocellulose-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting of soft tissue. In: Ovsianikov A, Yoo J, Mironov V, editors. 3D printing and biofabrication. New York (NY): Springer; 2016. p. 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lee VK, Trasatti J, Bjornsson C, et al. Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014;20:473–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan R, Ryan A, David T, et al. Laser direct writing of combinatorial libraries of idealized cellular constructs. Biomedical applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255:5444–5447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allain LR, Askari M, Stokes DL, et al. Microarray sampling-platform fabrication using bubble-jet technology for a biochip system. Fresen J Anal Chem. 2001;371:146–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binder KW, Allen AJ, Yoo JJ, et al. Drop-on-demand inkjet bioprinting: a primer. Gene Ther Regul. 2011;11:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee W, Debasitis JC, Lee VK, et al. Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1587–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A. Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;101:272–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael S, Sorg H, Peck CT, et al. Tissue engineered skin substitutes created by laser-assisted bioprinting form skin-like structures in the dorsal skin fold chamberin mice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch L, Kuhn S, Sorg H, et al. Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16:847–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremias TS, Machado RG, Silvia JP, et al. Dermal substitutes support the growth of human skin-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: potential tool for skin regeneration. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skardal A, Mack D, Kapetanovic E, et al. Bioprinted amniotic fluid-derived stem cells accelerate healing of large skin wounds. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:792–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins CA, Chen JC, Cerise JE, et al. Microenvironmental reprogramming by three-dimensional culture enables dermal papilla cells to induce de novo human hair-follicle growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:19679–19688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BS, Lee J, Gao G, et al. Direct 3D cell-printing of human skin with functional transwell system. Biofabrication. 2017;9:025034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourchet LJ, Thepot A, Albouy M, et al. Human skin 3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6. DOI:10.1002/adhm.201601101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu LN, Zhou P, Zhang SM, et al. Evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose-based uniform wound dressing for large area skin transplantation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33:2995–3000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorovich NE, Schuurman W, Wijnberg HM, et al. Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2012;18:33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Finn MG, et al. Direct human cartilage repair using three-dimensional bioprinting technology. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18:1304–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes B, Zhu W, Li J, et al. Development of novel three-dimensional printed scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21:403–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Binder KW, Albanna MZ, et al. Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication. 2013;5:015001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Rhie JW, Cho DW. Development of three-dimensional alginate encapsulated chondrocyte hybrid scaffold using microstereolithography. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2008;130:021007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SJ, Kang T, Rhie JW, et al. Development of three-dimensional hybrid scaffold using chondrocyte-encapsulated alginate hydrogel. Sens Mater. 2007;19:445e451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim JH, Lee JS, Kim JY, et al. Bioprinting of a mechanically enhanced three-dimensional dual cell-laden construct for osteochondraltissue engineering using a multi-head tissue/organ building system. J Micromech Microeng. 2012;22:085014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood JK, Riley SL, Palazzolo R, et al. A three-dimensional osteochondral composite scaffold for articularcartilage repair. Biomaterials. 2002;23:4739–4751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruene M, Deiwick A, Koch L, et al. Laser printing of stem cells for biofabrication of scaffold-free autologous grafts. Tissue Eng C: Methods. 2011;17:79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Breitenkamp K, Lotz M, et al. Synergistic action of fibroblast growth factor-2 and transforming growth factor-beta1 enhances bioprinted human neocartilage formation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109: 2357–2368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbolat IT, Chen H, Yu Y. Development of ‘Multi-arm Bioprinter’ for hybrid biofabrication of tissue engineering constructs. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2014;30:295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannoor MS, Jiang Z, James T, et al. 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett. 2013;13:2634–2639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markstedt K, Mantas A, Tournier I, et al. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose–alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16:1489–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen D, Hägg DA, Forsman A, et al. Cartilage tissue engineering by the 3D bioprinting of iPS cells in a nanocellulose/alginate bioink. Sci Rep. 2017;7:658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller T, Amoroso M, Hägg D, et al. In vivo chondrogenesis in 3D bioprinted human cell-laden hydrogel constructs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park JH, Park JY, Nam IC, et al. Huma6n turbinate mesenchymal stromal cell sheets with bellows graft for rapid tracheal epithelial regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2015;25:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopf DA, Flanagan CL, Wheeler M, et al. Treatment of severe porcine tracheomalacia with a dimensionally printed, bioresorbable, external airway splint. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein TA, Smith BD, Zeltsman D, et al. Introducing a 3-dimensionally printed, tissue-engineered graft for airway reconstruction: a pilot study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153:1001–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JW, Park SA, Park JK, et al. Tissue-engineered tracheal reconstruction using three-dimensionally printed artificial tracheal graft: preliminary report. Artif Organs. 2014;38:95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung SY, Lee SJ, Kim HY, et al. 3D printed polyurethane prosthesis for partial tracheal reconstruction: a pilot animal study. Biofabrication. 2016;8:045015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao M, Zhang H, Dong W, et al. Tissue-engineered trachea from a 3D-printed scaffold enhances whole-segment tracheal repair. Sci Rep. 2017;7:5246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Khorasani MT, Montazeri N, et al. Types of neural guides and using nanotechnology for peripheral nerve reconstruction. Int J Nanomed. 2010;5:839–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri R, Biazar E. Development of oriented nanofibrous silk guide for repair of nerve defects. Int J Polym Mater Po. 2016;65:91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari SK. Chitosan–cross-linked nanofibrous PHBV nerve guide for rat for sciatic nerve regeneration across a defect bridge. ASAIO J. 2013;59:651–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S. Gelatin-modified nanofibrous PHBV tube as artificial nerve graft for rat sciatic nerve regeneration. Int J Polym Mater Po. 2014;63:330–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S. Design of an oriented porous polymeric guide for neural regeneration. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2014;63:753–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S. Behavioral evaluation of regenerated rat sciatic nerve by a nanofibrous PHBV conduit filled with Schwann cell as artificial nerve graft. Cell Commun Adhes. 2013;20:93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S. Rat sciatic nerve regeneration across a 30-mm defect bridged by a nanofibrous PHBV and Schwann cell as artificial nerve graft. Cell Commun Adhes. 2013;20:41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S. Rat sciatic nerve reconstruction across a 30 mm defect bridged by an oriented porous PHBV tube with Schwann cell as artificial nerve graft. ASAIO J. 2014;60:224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S, Pouya M, et al. Nanofibrous nerve conduits for repair of 30-mm-long sciatic nerve defects. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8:2266–2274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biazar E, Heidari S, Pouya M. Efficacy of nanofibrous conduits in repair of long-segment sciatic nerve defects. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8:2501–2509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Gregory CA, Molnar P, et al. Viability and electrophysiology of neural cell structures generated by the inkjet printing method. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3580–3588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri S, Han LH, Zhang W, et al. Solid freeform fabrication of designer scaffolds of hyaluronic acid for nerve tissue engineering. Biomed Microdevices. 2011;13:983–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley JL, Jennings SR, Moore MJ. Fabrication of micropatterned hydrogels for neural culture systems using dynamic mask projection photolithography. J Vis Exp. 2011;48:2636.
   Google Scholar
• Lee YB, Polio S, Lee W, et al. Bio-printing of collagen and VEGF-releasing fibrin gel scaffolds for neural stem cell culture. Exp Neurol. 2010;223:645–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh FY, Lin HH, Hsu SH. 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials. 2015;71:48–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens CM, Marga F, Forgacs G, et al. Biofabrication and testing of a fully cellular nerve graft. Biofabrication. 2013;5:045007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Zhu Q, Liu X, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the microstructure of human acellular nerve allograft. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Wu Y, Gou Z, et al. 3D-engineering of cellularized conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32184. DOI: 10.1038/srep32184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BN, McAlpine C. ‘From print to patient: 3D-printed personalized nerve regeneration’. Biochemist. 2016;38:28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Yurie H, Ikeguchi R, Aoyama T, et al. The efficacy of a scaffold-free Bio 3D conduit developed from human fibroblasts on peripheral nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve model. PLoS One. 2017;12: e0171448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Lee V, Polio S, et al. On-demand three-dimensional freeform fabrication of multi-layered hydrogel scaffold with fluidic channels. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010;105:1178–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Haverinen HM, Dhagat P, et al. Inkjet printing-process and its applications. Adv Mater Weinheim. 2010;22:673–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norotte C, Marga FS, Niklason LE, et al. Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5910–5917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skardal A, Zhang J, McCoard L, et al. Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16:2675–2685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman AS, et al. 3D bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue constructs. Adv Mater Weinheim. 2014;26:3124–3130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertassoni LE, Cecconi M, Manoharan V. Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab Chip. 2014;14:2202–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Zhao W, Zhu JM, et al. Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials. 2013;34:130–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JS, Stevens KR, Yang MT. Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nature Mater. 2012;11:768–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieber L, Or S, Ruvinov E, et al. Microfabrication of channel arrays promotes vessel-like network formation in cardiac cell construct and vascularization in vivo. Biofabrication. 2014;6:024102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee VK, Kim DY, Ngo H, et al. Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8092–8102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Chen S. Projection printing of 3-dimensional tissue scaffolds. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;868:289–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2016;76:321–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaeser A, Duarte Campos DF, Weber M, et al. Biofabrication under fluorocarbon: a novel freeform fabrication technique to generate high aspect ratio tissue-engineered constructs. Biores. 2013;2:374–384.
   Google Scholar
• Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, et al. Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6. DOI:10.1002/adhm.201700015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar