Low-cost multifrequency electrical impedance-based system (MFEIBS) for clinical imaging: design and performance evaluation

References

• Kerner TE, Williams DB, Osterman KS, et al. Electrical impedance imaging at multiple frequencies in phantoms. Physiol Meas. 2000;21:67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malich A, Böhm T, Facius M, et al. Electrical impedance scanning as a new imaging modality in breast cancer detection—a short review of clinical value on breast application, limitations and perspectives. Nuclear Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A: Accelerat Spectromet Detect Assoc Equip. 2003;497:xv–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojadinovic A, Nissan A, Gallimidi Z, et al. Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2703–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assenheimer M, Laver-Moskovitz O, Malonek D, et al. The T-SCANTM technology: electrical impedance as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer detection. Physiol Meas. 2001;22:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jossinet J, Marry E, Montalibet A. Electrical impedance endo-tomography: imaging tissue from inside. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:560–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazebnik M, Popovic D, McCartney L, et al. A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal, benign and malignant breast tissues obtained from cancer surgeries. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:6093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherepenin VA, Karpov AY, Korjenevsky AV, et al. Three-dimensional EIT imaging of breast tissues: system design and clinical testing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:662–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer S, Ivorra A, Reuter VE, et al. Electrical impedance characterization of normal and cancerous human hepatic tissue. Physiol Meas. 2010;31:995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faes TJ, Van der Meij HA, De, et al. The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. Physiol Meas. 1999;20:R1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash S, Karnes MP, Sequin EK, et al. Ex vivo electrical impedance measurements on excised hepatic tissue from human patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Physiol Meas. 2015;36:315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halter RJ, Hartov A, Heaney JA, et al. Electrical impedance spectroscopy of the human prostate. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:2303–2307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meaney PM, Fanning MW, Li D, et al. A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Techn. 2000;48: 1841;53.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell AM, Land DV. Dielectric properties of female human breast tissue measured in vitro at 3.2 GHz. Phys Med Biol. 1992;37:193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel C, Peyman A, Grant EH. Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:4863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—Part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1226–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone E, dos Santos GS, et al. Multifrequency electrical impedance tomography using spectral constraints. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33:340–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halter RJ, Zhou T, Meaney PM, et al. The correlation of in vivo and ex vivo tissue dielectric properties to validate electromagnetic breast imaging: initial clinical experience. Physiol Meas. 2009;30:6–S121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys Med Biol. 1996;41:2251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan AM, El-Shenawee M. Review of electromagnetic techniques for breast cancer detection. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;4: 103–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang W, Sze G, et al. An image reconstruction algorithm for 3-D electrical impedance mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33:2223–2241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halter R, Hartov A, Paulsen KD. Design and implementation of a high frequency electrical impedance tomography system. Physiol Meas. 2004;25:379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halter RJ, Hartov A, Paulsen KD. A broadband high-frequency electrical impedance tomography system for breast imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:650–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo JK, Kwon O, Ammari H, et al. A mathematical model for breast cancer lesion estimation: electrical impedance technique using TS2000 commercial system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:1898–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemm M, Leendertz JA, Gibbins D, et al. Microwave radar-based differential breast cancer imaging: Imaging in homogeneous breast phantoms and low contrast scenarios. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2010;58:2337–2344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fear EC, Stuchly MA. Microwave detection of breast cancer. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Techn. 2000;48:1854–1863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Anand S, Lall B, IEEE, et al. Practical phantom study of low cost portable EIT based cancer screening device. In Long Island Systems. Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT) 2016 April 29, p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Singh G, Anand S, Lall B, et al. Development of a microcontroller based electrical impedance tomography system. In Long Island Systems. Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT) 2015 May 1; p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle A, Adler A. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images. Physiol Meas. 2011;32:745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador SM, Vecchi G. Experimental tests of microwave breast cancer detection on phantoms. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2009;57:4019–4012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao TJ, Saulnier GJ, Isaacson D, et al. A versatile high-permittivity phantom for EIT. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55:2601–2607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenmaier JF, McCarthy CJ, Brophy DP, et al. Evaluation of the particulate concentration in a gelatin‐based phantom for sonographically guided lesion biopsy. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1471–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal PK, Shokoufi M, Liu J, et al. Electrical characterization of bolus material as phantom for use in electrical impedance and computed tomography fusion imaging. J Electrical Bioimpedance. 2014;5:34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon H, Cousineau M, Adler A, et al. A resistive mesh phantom for assessing the performance of EIT systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:2257–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazebnik M, Madsen EL, Frank GR, et al. Tissue-mimicking phantom materials for narrowband and ultrawideband microwave applications. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:4245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bera TK, Nagaraju J. Electrical impedance spectroscopic studies on broiler chicken tissue suitable for the development of practical phantoms in multifrequency EIT. Chinese Sci Bull. 2003;48:1728–1763.
   Google Scholar
• Kim M, Jang J, Kim H, et al. A 1.4-mΩ sensitivity 94-dB dynamic-range electrical impedance tomography SoC and 48-channel Hub-SoC for 3-D lung ventilation monitoring system. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits. 2017;52:2829–2842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerworth RJ, Bayford RH, Brown B, et al. Electrical impedance tomography spectroscopy (EITS) For human head imaging. Physiol Meas. 2003;24:477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerworth RJ, Bayford RH, Cusick G, et al. Design and performance of the UCLH Mark 1b 64 Channel electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system, optimized for imaging brain function. Physiol Meas. 2002;23:771–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RW, Freeston IL, Brown BH. A real-time electrical impedance tomography system for clinical use-design and preliminary results. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995;42:133–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Lee K, Ha U, et al. A 4.9 mΩ-sensitivity mobile electrical impedance tomography IC for early breast-cancer detection system. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits. 2015;50:245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh TI, Woo EJ, Holder D. Multi-frequency EIT system with radially symmetric architecture: KHU Mark1. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:S183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Yin W, Holliday N. A highly adaptive electrical impedance sensing system for flow measurement. Meas Sci Technol. 2002;13:1884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizi L, McEwan A, Oh T, et al. A comparison of two EIT systems suitable for imaging impedance changes in epilepsy. Physiol Meas. 2009;30:S103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Lee J, Bae J, et al. A 10.4 mW electrical impedance tomography SoC for portable real-time lung ventilation monitoring system. Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC) 2014. New York: IEEE Asian 2014, p. 193–196.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Polito S, Agell C, et al. A low-power and compact-sized wearable bio-impedance monitor with wireless connectivity. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2013;434:012013.
   Google Scholar