Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses

References

• Sethi A, Kaus T, Sochor P, et al. Evolution of the concept of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: 14-year clinical data. Implant Dent. 2002;11:41–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, et al. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annunziata M, Guida L. The effect of titanium surface modifications on dental implant osseointegration. Front Oral Biol. 2015;17:62–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aljateeli M, Wang HL. Implant microdesigns and their impact on osseointegration. Implant Dent. 2013;22:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:76–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho PG, Sudack P, Suzuki M, et al. In vitro evaluation of the implant abutment connection sealing capability of different implant systems. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:917–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:85–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• das Neves FD, Verissimo AG, da Silva Neto JP, et al. Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading. JOMI. 2013;28:e38–e44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Prado Ribeiro P, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, et al. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:797–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Prado Ribeiro P, Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, et al. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:523–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goiato MC, Arsufi GS, de Medeiros RA, et al. Stress distribution in bone simulation model with pre-angled implants. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39:322–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goiato MC, Shibayama R, Filho HG, et al. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity. J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40:35–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellizzer EP, Carli RI, Falcon-Antenucci RM, et al. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems. J Oral Implantol. 2014;40:117–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Ferraco R, et al. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonella BP, Pellizzer EP, Falcon-Antenucci RM, et al. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:2060–2063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho Goiato M, Pesqueira AA, Falcon-Antenucci RM, et al. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, et al. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:106009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesqueira AA, Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, et al. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic. J Biomed Opt. 2012;18:061203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojic LT, Milic Lemic A, Tanasic I, et al. Compressive strains and displacement in a partially dentate lower jaw rehabilitated with two different treatment modalities. Gerodontology. 2012;29:e851–e857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses: a review. J Dent. 2002;30:271–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Medeiros RA, Pellizzer EP, Vechiato Filho AJ, et al. Evaluation of marginal bone loss of dental implants with internal or external connections and its association with other variables: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:501–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covani U, Ricci M, Tonelli P, et al. An evaluation of new designs in implant–abutment connections. A finite element method assessment. Implant Dent. 2013;22:263–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anami L, Costa Lima J, Takahashi F, et al. Stress distribution around osseointegrated implants with different internal-cone connections: photoelastic and finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2013;41:155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andrade CL, Carvalho MA, Del Bel Cury AA, et al. Biomechanical effect of prosthetic connection and implant body shape in low-quality bone of maxillary posterior single implant-supported restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:e92–e97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Faria Almeida DA, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, et al. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis. J Periodontol. 2014;85:261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes SR, de Araujo CA, Neto AJ, et al. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant–abutment interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:781–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanaoka M, Gehrke SA, Mardegan F, et al. Influence of implant/abutment connection on stress distribution to implant-surrounding bone: a finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2014;23:565–571.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar