Fatigue and microgap behaviour of a three-unit implant-fixed dental prosthesis combining conventional and dynamic abutments

References

• Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, et al. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:268–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berroeta E, Zabalegui I, Donovan T, et al. Dynamic abutment: a method of redirecting screw access for implant-supported restorations: technical details and a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113:516–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb G, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prostheses osseointegration in clinical dentistry: quintessence. 1985. p. 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli D, Ottria L, De Vico G, et al. Full rehabilitation with nobel clinician(®) and procera implant bridge(®): case report. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2013;6:25–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenfeld A, Mandelaris G, Tardieu P. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modelling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban I, Jovanovic S, Lozada J. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (gbr) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:502–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban I, Nagursky H, Lozada J. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a resorbable membrane and particulated autogenous bone with or without anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 22 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:404–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban I, Lozada JL, Jovanovic SA, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation with titanium-reinforced, dense-ptfe membranes and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 19 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, et al. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:167–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti MS, Hämmerle CHF. On behalf of the European workshop on periodontology group C. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:168–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:237–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, et al. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:163–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotfredsen K, Wiskott A, Working G. Consensus report - reconstructions on implants. The third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:238–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bössmann K, et al. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:875–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motegi E, Nomura M, Tachiki C, et al. Occlusal force in people in their sixties attending college for elderly. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2009;50:135–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1977;35:297–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikebe K, Nokubi T, Morii K, et al. Association of bite force with ageing and occlusal support in older adults. J Dent. 2005;33:131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathyanarayana HP, Premkumar S, Manjula W. Assessment of maximum voluntary bite force in adults with normal occlusion and different types of malocclusions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:534–538.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnsen SE, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Forces applied by anterior and posterior teeth and roles of periodontal afferents during hold-and-split tasks in human subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2007;178:126–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baca E, Yengin E, Gökçen-Röhlig B, et al. In vivo evaluation of occlusal contact area and maximum bite force in patients with various types of implant-supported prostheses. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:1181–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE. Long-term effects on chewing with mandibular fixed prostheses on osseointegrated implants. Acta Odontol Scand. 1985;43:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltimo A, Könönen M. Maximal bite force and its association with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53:254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor B, Suleiman M, Palmer RM. The effects of simulated bone loss on the implant-abutment assembly and likelihood of fracture: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:729–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, et al. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-abutment connections. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1146–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento C, Miani P, Vinícius P, et al. Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer S, Stanford C, Buranadham S, et al. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant–abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke S, Pereira A. Changes in the abutment-implant interface in morse taper implant connections after mechanical cycling: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:791–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, et al. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31:269–275.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dias E, Bisognin E, Harari N, et al. Evaluation of implant-abutment microgap and bacterial leakage in five external-hex implant systems: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:346–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanishi Y, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S, et al. Influences of implant neck design and implant–abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater. 2012;28:1126–1133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitosa P, de Lima A, Silva-Concílio L, et al. Stability of external and internal implant connections after a fatigue test. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:267–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometr Bullet. 1945;1:80–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann HB, Whitney DR. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Statist. 1947;18:50–60.
   Google Scholar
• The R project for statistical computing [internet]. Vienna: GNU project. Available from: https://www.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• The international organization for standardization (ISO). Dentistry. Fatigue test for endosseous dental implants. Geneva: ISO; 2007. Standard nr 14801-2007(E).
   Google Scholar
• Ortorp A, Jemt T, Bäck T, et al. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and cnc-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierraalta M, Vivas J, Razzoog M, et al. Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1.
   Google Scholar
• Karl M, Holst S. Strain developments of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25:166–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasri R, Drago C, Siegel S, et al. Volumetric misfit in CAD/CAM and cast implant frameworks: a university laboratory study. J Prosthond. 2011;20:267–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar