Medical device development, from technical design to integrated product development

References

• Heron NM, Tindale WB. Healthcare technology co-operatives: innovative about innovation. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39:378–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moody L. User-centred health design: reflections on D4D’s experiences and challenges. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39:395–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cummins G, Cox BF, Walker JD, et al. Challenges in developing collaborative interdisciplinary research between gastroenterologists and engineers. J Med Eng Technol. 2018;42:435–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu B, Luo M, Li M, et al. Medical colleges summary of biomedical engineering profession. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2013;06:277–279.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenfeld H, Forcellini FA, Amaral DC, et al. Gestão de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma referência para melhoria do processo [Product development management: a benchmark for process improvement]. Brasil (SP): Saraiva; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• International Standard. Medical devices quality management systems requirements for regulatory purposes. 2nd ed. Switzerland: ISO 13485 ISO; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pietzsch JB, Aquino L, Yock P, et al. Review of U.S. medical device regulation. J Med Devices. 2007;1:283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Santos I, Gazelle S, Rocha LA, et al. Medical device specificities: opportunities for a dedicated product development methodology. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012;9:299–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SGS Group Management. Medical device regulations in the main global markets. Geneva: SGS Group Management; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pietzsch JB, Zanchi MG, Linehan JH. Medical device innovators and the 510(k) regulatory pathway: implications of a survey-based assessment of industry experience. J Med Devices. 2012;6:021015–021018.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Classification of medical devices, medical devices: guidance document. Brussels: European Commission; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Koivukangas T, Haapola J. Streamlining medical device design development process from research laboratory to the market. 9th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology; 2015 Mar 24–26; Kamakura, Japan. IEEE; 2015. p. 98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Echeveste ME, Ribeiro JL. Diagnóstico e intervenção em empresas médias: uma proposta de (re)organização das atividades do Processo de Desenvolvimento de Produtos. Produção. 2010;20:378–391.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes GH, Toledo JC. Explorando práticas do desenvolvimento de produtos em pequenas e médias empresas do setor de equipamentos médico-hospitalares [Exploring product development practices in small and medium-sized companies in the medical-hospital equipment sector]. Gest Prod. 2012;19:103–117.
   Google Scholar
• Millward H, Lewis A. Barriers to successful new product development within small manufacturing companies. J Small Bus Enter Dev. 2005;12:379–394.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira ACD, Kaminski PC. A reference model to determine the degree of maturity in the product development process of industrial SMEs. Technovation. 2012;32:671–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown A, Dixon D, Eatock J, et al. A survey of success factors in new product. 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference; 2008 Jun 28–30; Estoril, Portugal: IEEE. DOI:10.1109/IEMCE.2008.4617987
   Google Scholar
• Evanschitzky H, Eisend M, Calantone R, et al. Success factors of product innovation: an updated meta-analysis. J Prod Innov Manag. 2012;29:21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SB, Kirkire MS. Analysis of barriers to medical device development in India: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2016;7:356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkire MS, Rane SB. Evaluation of success factors for medical device development using grey DEMATEL approach. J Modell Manage. 2017;12:204–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SB, Kirkire MS. Interpretive structural modelling of risk sources in medical device development process. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. 2017;8:451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alliprandini DH, Toledo JC. Modelo para gestão do processo de desenvolvimento de produtos: uma proposta baseada em dimensões críticas. IV Congresso Brasileiro de Gestão e Desenvolvimento de Produtos [Product development process management model: a proposal based on critical dimensions. IV Brazilian Congress of Product Management and Development]. Gramado, RS, Brazil; 2003 OCT 6–8. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng LC. Caracterização da Gestão de Desenvolvimento do Produto: Delineando o seu Contorno e Dimensões Básicas [Characterization of product development management: outlining your outline and basic dimensions]. Congresso Brasileiro De Gestão De Desenvolvimento De Produto II Brazilian Congress of Product Management and Development. São Carlos-SP, Brazil; 2000 Jun. p. 1–9. II Brazilian Congress of Product Management and Development. conference date: 2000 June location: São Carlos-SP, Brazil
   Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Wheelwright SC. Managing new product and process development. New York: Free Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes GH. O processo de desenvolvimento de produto em empresas de base tecnológica: caracterização da gestão e proposta de modelo de referência [The process of product development in technology-based companies: management characterization and reference model proposal] [thesis]. Brazil (SP): Universidad Federal de São Carlos; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn KB, Barczak G, Nicholas J, et al. An examination of new product development best practice. J Prod Innov Manag. 2012;29:180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asimow M. Introduction to design. USA: Prentice Hall; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper R. Perspective: the stage-gate idea-to-launch process – update, what’s new and NexGen systems. J Product Innovation Man. 2008;25:213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich K, Eppinger SD. Product design and development. 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski P. Desenvolvendo Produtos com Planejamento Criatividade e Qualidade [Developing products with planning creativity and quality]. Brasil (SP): LTC; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Silva G, Kaminski PC. Proposal of framework to managing the automotive product development process. Cogent Eng. 2017;4:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander K, Clarkson P. Good design practice for medial devise and equipment, part I: a review of current literature. J Med Eng Technol. 2000;24:5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander K, Clarkson P, Bishop D, et al. Good design practice for medical devices and equipment a framework. UK: University of Cambridge; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Pietzsch JB, Shluzas LA, Paté-Cornell ME, et al. Stage-gate process for the development of medical devices. J Med Devices. 2009;3:021004–021015.
   Google Scholar
• Medina LA, Okudan GE, Wysk RA. Supporting medical device development: a standard product design process model. J Eng Des. 2012;24:1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert A, Roth S, Chamoret D, et al. Functional design method for improving safety and ergonomics of mechanical products. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2012;05:457–468.
   Google Scholar
• Santos I, Gazelle S, Rocha L, et al. A dedicated methodology for the development of new medical technologies. International Conference on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering; 2012. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Santos I. Product development methodologies: the case of medical device [thesis]. Porto: Universidade Do Porto; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Evans JH. Basic design concepts. J Am Soc Naval Eng. 1959;71:671–678.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm BW. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer. 1988;21:61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard. Medical electrical equipment – Part 1: general requirements for basic safety and essential performance. Switzerland: IEC 60601-1, ISO; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• International Standard. Medical electrical equipment. Switzerland: IEC 60601-2-52; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR 820 – quality system regulation. Rockville (MD): FDA; 2011. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title21-vol8/pdf/CFR-2011-title21-vol8-part820.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Standard. Quality management systems. Switzerland: ISO 9001; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• International Standard. Medical devices application of risk management to medical devices. Switzerland: ISO 14971; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical devices – part 1: application of usability engineering to medical devices. Switzerland: IEC 62366-1; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical devices – part 2: guidance on the application of usability engineering to medical devices. Switzerland: IEC/TR 62366-2; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices. Rockville (MD): FDA; 2016. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/applying-human-factors-and-usability-engineering-medical-devices
   Google Scholar
• International Standard. Medical devices – recognized essential principles of safety and performance of medical devices – part 1. Switzerland: ISO 16142-1; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• International Standard. Medical devices – recognized essential principles of safety and performance of medical devices – part 2. Switzerland: ISO 16142-2; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes GH, Toledo JC. The fuzzy front end of new product development for Brazilian technology-based companies in the medical device industry: a causal model. Braz J Oper Prod Manage. 2011;8:83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Turner R, Ledwith A, Kelly J. Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: matching processes to the nature of the firm. Int J Project Manage. 2010;28:744–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar