References
- Mohammadi H, Mequanint K. Prosthetic aortic heart valves: modeling and design. Med Eng Phys. 2011;33(2):131–147.
- Mohammadi H, Fradet G. Prosthetic aortic heart valves. Cardio Vasc Syst. 2017;5:2. DOI: 10.7243/2052-4358-5-2
- Mohammadi H, Jahandardoost M, Fradet G. Elliptic St. Jude bileaflet mechanical heart valves. Cardio Vasc Syst. 2015;3(1):1–6.
- Jahandardoost M, Fradet G, Mohammadi H. Hemodynamic study of the elliptic St. Jude Medical valve: a computational study. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2016;230(2):85–96.
- Jahandardoost M, Fradet G, Mohammadi H. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: a computational study. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H. 2016;230:1–16.
- Jahandardoost M, Fradet G, Mohammadi H. A novel computational model for the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical valves in the opening phase. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2015;229(3):232–244.
- Jahandardoost M, Ohlmann L, Fradet G, et al. Proposed oval St. Jude medical valve, effect of heart rate. J Mech Med Biol. 2018;18(2):1850014.
- Rahimtoola SH. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(22):2413–2426.
- Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WRE, et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(3):783–796.
- Milano AD, De Carlo M, Mecozzi G, et al. Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses, comparison at long-term follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(1):37–43.
- Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. Influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(1):39–47.
- Weber A, Noureddine H, Englberger L, et al. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(5):1075–1083.
- Blanke P, Russe M, Leipsic J, et al. Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(9):984–994.
- Murphy DT, Blanke P, Alaamri S, et al. Dynamism of the aortic annulus: effect of diastolic versus systolic CT annular measurements on device selection in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(1):37–43.
- Suchá D, Tuncay V, Prakken NHJ, et al. Does the aortic annulus undergo conformational change throughout the cardiac cycle? A systematic review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(12):1307–1317.
- Mohammadi H, Boughner D, Millon LE, et al. Design and simulation of a poly(vinyl alcohol)—bacterial cellulose nanocomposite mechanical aortic heart valve prosthesis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009;223(6):697–711.
- Mohammadi H. Nanocomposite biomaterial mimicking aortic heart valve leaflet mechanical behaviour. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2011;225(7):718–722.
- Mosadegh B, Polygerinos P, Keplinger C, et al. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24(15):2163–2170.