References
- Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mélot C, et al. The aging of the population: a growing concern for spine care in the twenty-first century. Eur Spine J. 2003;12(Suppl. 2):S81–S83.
- Guyton SW. Robotic surgery: the computer-enhanced control of surgical instruments. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2002;35(6):1303–1316.
- Lee JYK, Bhowmick DA, Eun DD, et al. Minimally invasive, robot-assisted, anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2013;74(4):258–261.
- Staub BN, Sadrameli SS. The use of robotics in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(Suppl. 1):S31–S40.
- Bertelsen A, Melo J, Sánchez E, et al. A review of surgical robots for spinal interventions. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(4):407–422.
- Nathoo N, Cavuşoğlu MC, Vogelbaum MA, et al. In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):421–433.
- Kaushal M, Kurpad S, Choi H. Robotic-assisted systems for spinal surgery [online first]. IntechOpen; 2019. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/robotic-assisted-systems-for-spinal-surgery
- Sukovich W, Brink-Danan S, Hardenbrook M. Miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw placement in posterior spinal fusion: early clinical experience with the SpineAssist. Int J Med Robot. 2006;2(2):114–122.
- Shoham M, Lieberman IH, Benzel EC, et al. Robotic assisted spinal surgery-from concept to clinical practice. Comput Aided Surg. 2007;12(2):105–115.
- Pechlivanis I, Kiriyanthan G, Engelhardt M, et al. Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine using a bone mounted miniature robotic system: first experiences and accuracy of screw placement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(4):392–398.
- Devito DP, Kaplan L, Dietl R, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with SpineAssist surgical robot: retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(24):2109–2115.
- Barzilay Y, Liebergall M, Fridlander A, et al. Miniature robotic guidance for spine surgery-introduction of a novel system and analysis of challenges encountered during the clinical development phase at two spine centres. Int J Med Robot. 2006;2(2):146–153.
- Hu X, Lieberman IH. What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(6):1839–1844.
- Onen MR, Simsek M, Naderi S. Robotic spine surgery: a preliminary report. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24:512–518.
- Dreval ON, Rynkov IP, Kasparova KA, et al. Results of using Spine Assist Mazor in surgical treatment of spine disorders. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2014;78(3):14–20.
- van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(17):E986–E991.
- Schatlo B, Martinez R, Alaid A, et al. Unskilled unawareness and the learning curve in robotic spine surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(10):1819–1823.
- Macke JJ, Woo R, Varich L, et al. Accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the pediatric population. J Robot Surg. 2016;10(2):145–150.
- Tsai TH, Wu DS, Su YF, et al. A retrospective study to validate an intraoperative robotic classification system for assessing the accuracy of Kirschner wire (K-wire) placements with postoperative computed tomography classification system for assessing the accuracy of pedicle screw placements. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(38):e4834.
- Kuo KL, Su YF, Wu CH, et al. Assessing the intraoperative accuracy of pedicle screw placement by using a bone-mounted miniature robot system through secondary registration. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153235.
- Lefranc M, Peltier J. Evaluation of the ROSA™ Spine robot for minimally invasive surgical procedures. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13(10):899–906.
- Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, et al. Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus. 2017a;42(5):E11.
- Vardiman A, Wallace D, Crawford N, et al. Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery. J Robotic Surg. 2020;14(3):409–413.
- Bederman SS, Hahn P, Colin V, et al. Robotic guidance for S2-Alar-Iliac screws in spinal deformity correction. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E49–E53.
- Liu H, Chen W, Wang Z, et al. Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2016;11(12):2273–2281.
- Yu L, Chen X, Margalit A, et al. Robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery – a systematic review and a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Med Robot. 2018;14(3):e1892.
- Ringel F, Stüer C, Reinke A, et al. Accuracy of robot-assisted placement of lumbar and sacral pedicle screws. Spine. 2012; 37(8):E496–E501.
- Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G, et al. Spinal robotics. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:A12–A18.
- Hyun S-J, Kim K-J, Jahng T-A, et al. Minimally invasive robotic versus open fluoroscopic-guided spinal instrumented fusions. Spine. 2017;42(6):353–358.
- Wang JQ, Wang Y, Feng Y, et al. Percutaneous sacroiliac screw placement: a prospective randomized comparison of robot-assisted navigation procedures with a conventional technique. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130(21):2527–2534.
- Kim H-J, Jung W-I, Chang B-S, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2017;13(3):e1779.
- Han X, Tian W, Liu Y, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30:1–8.
- Schizas C, Thein E, Kwiatkowski B, et al. Pedicle screw insertion: robotic assistance versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78:240–245.
- Lonjon N, Chan-Seng E, Costalat V, et al. Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(3):947–955.
- Zhang Q, Han XG, Xu YF, et al. Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e429–e434.
- Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):860–868.
- Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(6):636–643.
- Solomiichuk V, Fleischhammer J, Molliqaj G, et al. Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison. J Neurosurg. 2017;42(5):E13–E20.
- Molliqaj G, Schatlo B, Alaid A, et al. Accuracy of robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(5):E14.
- Keric N, Eum DJ, Afghanyar F, et al. Evaluation of surgical strategy of conventional vs. percutaneous robot-assisted spinal trans-pedicular instrumentation in spondylodiscitis. J Robot Surg. 2017b;11(1):17–25.
- Le X, Tian W, Shi Z, et al. Robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw instrumentation in lumbar spinal surgery: a matched-cohort comparison. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e745–e751.
- Shillingford JN, Laratta JL, Park PJ, et al. Human versus robot. Spine. 2018;43(21):E1297–E1304.
- Marcus HJ, Cundy TP, Nandi D, et al. Robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(2):291–297.
- Staartjes VE, Klukowska AM, Schröder ML. Pedicle screw revision in robot-guided, navigated, and freehand thoracolumbar instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:433–443.e8.
- Kaoudi A, Capel C, Chenin L, et al. Robot-assisted radiofrequency ablation of a sacral s1–s2 aggressive hemangioma. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:226–229.