Three-dimensional (3D) synthetic printing for the manufacture of non-biodegradable models, tools and implants used in surgery: a review of current methods

References

• Stratasys. 3D printing vs. CNC machining: comparing two rapid prototyping alternatives. White Papers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Largo RD, Garvey PB. Updates in head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(2):271e–285e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(2):159–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T. 2014;39(10):704–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoy MB. 3D printing: making things at the library. Med Ref Serv Q. 2013;32(1):94–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pham DT, Gault RS. A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 1998;38(10–11):1257–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping and direct digital manufacturing. 2nd ed. New York (London): Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chae MP, Rozen WM, McMenamin PG, et al. Emerging applications of bedside 3D printing in plastic surgery. Front Surg. 2015;2:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marine Core-Baillais HB, Richardot A, Kusnadi H. The state of 3D printing: the data you need to understand the 3D printing world and build your 3D printing strategy. Sculpteo; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212–10290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler A, Hickel R, Reymus M. 3D printing in dentistry—state of the art. Oper Dent. 2019;45(1):30–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z-c, P-L L, Chu F-t, et al. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy. J Orofac Orthoped/Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopäd. 2019;80(4):194–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrello J, Nasser P, Iatridis J, et al. 3D printing a mechanically-tunable acrylate resin on a commercial DLP-SLA printer. Addit Manuf. 2018;23:374–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang X, Wu J, Chen K, et al. Grayscale digital light processing 3D printing for highly functionally graded materials. Sci Adv. 2019;5(5):eaav5790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbon. Our technology [webpage]; 2019; [cited 2019 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.carbon3d.com/our-technology/
   Google Scholar
• Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N, et al. Additive manufacturing. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science. 2015;347(6228):1349–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna B. Printer subscription-pricing model is a brilliant move: motley fool; 2016; [cited 2019 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2016/04/09/why-carbons-m1-3d-printer-subscription-pricing-mod.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Zenha H, Azevedo L, Rios L, et al. The application of 3-D biomodeling technology in complex mandibular reconstruction—experience of 47 clinical cases. Eur J Plast Surg. 2011;34(4):257–265.
   Google Scholar
• Schepers RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: a new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(5):649–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winder J, Bibb R. Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(7):1006–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JW, Kim N. Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):267–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tröger C, Bens AT, Bermes G, et al. Ageing of acrylate-based resins for stereolithography: thermal and humidity ageing behaviour studies. Rapid Prototyp J. 2008;14(5):305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaus B, Bloebaum M, Koper D, et al. Interval cranioplasty with patient-specific implants and autogenous bone grafts—success and cost analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(8):1948–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaus B, Bloebaum M, Essers B, et al. Patient-specific implants compared with stored bone grafts for patients with interval cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(1):206–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaezi M, Yang S. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2015;10(3):123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Pohle D, Rechtenwald T. Selective laser sintering of PEEK. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol. 2007;56(1):205–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, et al. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(1):12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury J, Kirkpatrick SR, Maxwell M, et al. Neutral atom beam technique enhances bioactivity of PEEK. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;307:630–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhary KE, Thakker JS. Emerging biomaterials in trauma. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2017;29(1):51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaus B, Safi Y, ter Laak-Poort M, et al. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(6):1077–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolozzi P, Martinez A, Jaques B. Complex orbito-fronto-temporal reconstruction using computer-designed PEEK implant. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18(1):224–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brie J, Chartier T, Chaput C, et al. A new custom made bioceramic implant for the repair of large and complex craniofacial bone defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41(5):403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creighton M. Everything you need to know about polystyrene (PS) [Blog]. Creative mechanisms Blog2016; [cited 2018 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.creativemechanisms.com/blog/polystyrene-ps-plastic
   Google Scholar
• Systems D. Material selection guide for selective laser sintering. 3D Systems Inc.; 2018. Available from: https://realizeinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/3D-Systems-Duraform-SLS-Material-Selection-Guide-0315-USEN-WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Wang Y, Chen J, et al. Experimental investigation into the selective laser sintering of high-impact polystyrene. J Appl Polym Sci. 2008;108(1):535–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigwada G, Kandare E, Wang D, et al. Thermal stability and degradation kinetics of polystyrene/organically-modified montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2008;8(4):1927–1936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusheng S, Zhichong L, Haixiao S, et al. Development of a polymer alloy of polystyrene (PS) and polyamide (PA) for building functional part based on selective laser sintering (SLS). Proc IMechE. 2004;218(4):299–306.
   Google Scholar
• Griehl W, Ruestem D. Nylon-12—preparation, properties, and applications. Ind Eng Chem. 1970;62(3):16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlin C, Koppe M, Beziat JL, et al. Rapid prototyping in craniofacial surgery: using a positioning guide after zygomatic osteotomy – a case report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011;39(5):376–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiggener C, Messo E, Thor A, et al. A selective laser sintering guide for transferring a virtual plan to real time surgery in composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula osseous flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(2):187–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai MJ, Wu CT. Study of mandible reconstruction using a fibula flap with application of additive manufacturing technology. Biomed Eng Online. 2014;13:57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foundation BP. Nylons (polyamide) [Encyclopedia]; 2018; [cited 2018 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.bpf.co.uk/plastipedia/polymers/Polyamides.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Saini M, Singh Y, Arora P, et al. Implant biomaterials: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(1):52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des. 2014;58:242–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 3D A. 3D printer filament [Webpage]; 2018; [cited 2018 Mar 16]. Available from: https://airwolf3d.com/product-category/filament/
   Google Scholar
• 3ders.org. Price compare 3D printing materials. Available from: http://www.3ders.org/pricecompare/
   Google Scholar
• Plastics compatibility with sterilization methods web: industrial specialties manufacturing; 2019; [updated 2019 Jan 23; cited 2020]. Available from: http://www.industrialspec.com/images/files/Plastics-Compatibility-with-Sterilization-Methods-from-ISM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Proto3000. PLA vs ABS: what's the difference for 3D printing? [Youtube Video]; 2016; [cited 2016 October 2]. Available from: https://youtu.be/tC_z6jznFPY
   Google Scholar
• Goth S, Sawatari Y, Peleg M. Management of pediatric mandible fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen DC. Metal corrosion in the human body: the ultimate bio-corrosion scenario. Electrochem Soc Interface. 2008;17:31.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde F, Hanken H, Probst F, et al. Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10(12):2035–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotaru H, Schumacher R, Kim SG, et al. Selective laser melted titanium implants: a new technique for the reconstruction of extensive zygomatic complex defects. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;37(1):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoor P, Suomalainen A, Lindqvist C, et al. Rapid prototyped patient specific implants for reconstruction of orbital wall defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42(8):1644–1649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann A, Sinko K, Dorner G. Late reconstruction of the orbit with patient-specific implants using computer-aided planning and navigation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(12 Suppl.):S101–S106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozakiewicz M, Elgalal M, Loba P, et al. Clinical application of 3D pre-bent titanium implants for orbital floor fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37(4):229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klammert U, Gbureck U, Vorndran E, et al. 3D powder printed calcium phosphate implants for reconstruction of cranial and maxillofacial defects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38(8):565–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorri M, Nasser M, Oliver R. Resorbable versus titanium plates for facial fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;21(1):CD007158.
   Google Scholar
• Kontio R, Björkstrand R, Salmi M, et al. Designing and additive manufacturing a prototype for a novel instrument for mandible fracture reduction. Surgery. 2012;S1:002. doi:10.4172/2161-1076.S1-002
   Google Scholar
• Yim HW, Nguyen A, Kim YK. Facial contouring surgery with custom silicone implants based on a 3D prototype model and CT-scan: a preliminary study. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015;39(3):418–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra P, Miner J, D'Innocenzo R, et al. Use of 3-D stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011;10(1):6–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi-Kanno N, et al. Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med. 2014;10:45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao Y-T, Dressen T, Kim DSD, et al., editors. Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of 3D-printing built composite material. SFF Symposium; Austin, TX; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Galeta T, Raos P, Stojšić J, et al. Influence of structure on mechanical properties of 3D printed objects. Proc Eng. 2016;149:100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM, et al. 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35(13):4026–4034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorndran E, Klammert U, Ewald A, et al. Simultaneous immobilization of bioactives during 3D powder printing of bioceramic drug‐release matrices. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20(10):1585–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar