Factors associated with validity of consumer-oriented wearable physical activity trackers: a meta-analysis

References

• 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee scientific report. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health and Huan Services; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Agiovlasitis S, Yun J. Predictors of perceived health in adults with an intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;101:103642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alley S, Schoeppe S, Guertler D, et al. Interest and preferences for using advanced physical activity tracking devices: results of a national cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e011243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung W, Siebert EA, Yun J. Measuring physical activity with accelerometers for individuals with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;67:60–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Ryan J, Ambrosi C, et al. Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis JF. Measuring physical activity environments: a brief history. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(4 Suppl):S86–S92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CA, Yun J. Psychometric properties of two systematic observation techniques for assessing physical activity levels in children with mental retardation. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2006;18(4):446–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Future Market Insights. Global Wearable Fitness Trackers Market to Reach an Exponential Market Value of 93.69 Bn by 2027 End; 2017 [Accessed 2018 July 4]. Available from https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/press-release/wearable-fitness-trackers-market.
   Google Scholar
• Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for health. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech; 2013 [accessed 2017 Nov 5]. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons EJ, Lewis ZH, Mayrsohn BG, Rowland JL. Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(8):e192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperlich B, Holmberg H-C. Wearable, yes, but able…?: it is time for evidence-based marketing claims!. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(16):1240–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2020;23(6):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencell T. Valencell | National wearables survey reveals accuracy is top priority among consumers; lack of continually interesting insights among top reasons for discontinued use. valencell; 2016 [Accessed 2017 Oct 22]. Available from: https://valencell.com/press/2016/06/national-wearables-survey-reveals-accuracy-is-top-priority-among-consumers-lack-of-continually-interesting-insights-among-top-reasons-for-discontinued-use/.
   Google Scholar
• Aroganam G, Manivannan N, Harrison D. Review on wearable technology sensors used in consumer sport applications. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(9):1983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plasqui G, Bonomi AG, Westerterp KR. Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies. Obes Rev. 2013;14(6):451–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovich RA, Louvaris Z, Raste Y, et al. Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(5):1205–1215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn JA, Navalta JW, Fountaine CJ. Current state of commercial wearable technology in physical activity monitoring. Int J Exerc Sci. 2015;2018(13):2017.
   Google Scholar
• Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun J, Case L. Measurement in adapted physical education research. In: Routledge handbook of adapted physical education. 1st ed. New York (NY): Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2020. p. 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Yun J, Ulrich DA. Estimating measurement validity: a tutorial. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2002;19(1):32–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yngve A, Nilsson A, Sjostrom MM, et al. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the mti accelerometer output. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(2):320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Schumann M, Le S, et al. Reliability and validity of a new accelerometer-based device for detecting physical activities and energy expenditure. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agiovlasitis S, Motl RW, Fahs CA, et al. Metabolic rate and accelerometer output during walking in people with down syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1322–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1–1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoye AHK, Vusich J, Mitrzyk J, et al. Heart rate alters, but does not improve, calorie predictions in fitbit activity monitors. J Meas Phys Behav. 2018;1(1):9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Adam Noah J, Spierer DK, Gu J, et al. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. J Med Eng Technol. 2013;37(7):456–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris CE, Wessel PA, Tinius RA, et al. Validity of activity trackers in estimating energy expenditure during high-intensity functional training. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019;90(3):377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imboden MT, Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, et al. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(13):844–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Behrens TK, et al. Important differences in accelerometer cut points for quantifying physical activity in a nested occupational cohort. J Exerc Sports Orthop. 2014;1(1):12.
   Google Scholar
• Montoye AHK, Pivarnik JM, Mudd LM, et al. Comparison of activity type classification accuracy from accelerometers worn on the hip, wrists, and thigh in young, apparently healthy adults. Mea Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2016;20(3):173–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Mondwurf C, et al. Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105(6):490–497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazzoni P, Shabbott B, Cortés JC. Motor control abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(6):a009282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błaszczyk JW. Motor deficiency in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1998;58(1):79–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, et al. Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Post MW. What to do with “moderate. Reliability and validity coefficients? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(7):1051–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley EE, Golaszewski NM, Bartholomew JB. Estimating accuracy at exercise intensities: a comparative study of self-monitoring heart rate and physical activity wearable devices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(3):e34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, Dickin DC, et al. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors for specific activity types. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(8):1619–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman JA, Crouter SE, Bassett DR, et al. Accuracy of consumer monitors for estimating energy expenditure and activity type. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(2):371–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Wen D, Liang L, et al. Evaluating the validity of current mainstream wearable devices in fitness tracking under various physical activities: comparative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(4):e94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes J, Young JC, Tandy R, et al. Fitbit flex: energy expenditure and step count evaluation. J Exerc Physiol Online. 20(5):152–158.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby CA, Hanzel O, Patterson J, et al. Comparison of exercise energy expenditure values obtained from the garmin forerunner 230 and 235. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2018;50:661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price K, Bird SR, Lythgo N, et al. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running. J Med Eng Technol. 2017;41(3):208–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirard JR, Masteller B, Freedson PS, et al. Youth oriented activity trackers: comprehensive laboratory- and field-based validation. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(7):e250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, et al. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamont RM, Daniel HL, Payne CL, et al. Accuracy of wearable physical activity trackers in people with Parkinson’s disease. Gait Posture. 2018;63:104–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami H, Kawakami R, Nakae S, et al. Accuracy of wearable devices for estimating total energy expenditure: comparison with metabolic chamber and doubly labeled water method. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(5):702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki JE, Hickey A, Mavilia M, et al. Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(2):149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreaux BD, Hebert EP, Hollander DB, et al. Validity of wearable activity monitors during cycling and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(3):624–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootmaker SM, Chin A Paw MJM, Schuit AJ, et al. Concurrent validity of the PAM accelerometer relative to the MTI Actigraph using oxygen consumption as a reference: concurrent validity of the PAM accelerometer. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Turek J, Dornfeld C, et al. Validity of the Samsung Phone S Health application for assessing steps and energy expenditure during walking and running: does phone placement matter? Digital Health. 2016;2:205520761665274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stackpool CM, Porcari JP, Mikat RP, et al. The accuracy of various activity trackers in estimating steps taken and energy expenditure. J Fit Res. 2014;3(3):17.
   Google Scholar
• The All of Us Research Program Investigators. The “all of us” research program. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):668–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block VJ, Lizée A, Crabtree-Hartman E, et al. Continuous daily assessment of multiple sclerosis disability using remote step count monitoring. J Neurol. 2017;264(2):316–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausdorff JM. Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: common and distinct behavior among stride length, gait variability, and fractal-like scaling. Chaos. 2009;19(2):026113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaliot Kalifa T, Ziv N, Bergman H, et al. Increased energy expenditure during posture maintenance and exercise in early Parkinson disease. Health Sci Rep. 2018;1(1):e14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulrich BD, Haehl V, Buzzi UH, et al. Modeling dynamic resource utilization in populations with unique constraints: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome. Hum Mov Sci. 2004;23(2):133–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon NW, Baker PM, Goughnour K. Designing wearable technologies for users with disabilities: accessibility, usability, and connectivity factors. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:205566831986213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allahbakhshi H, Conrow L, Naimi B, et al. Using accelerometer and GPS data for real-life physical activity type detection. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(3):588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troped PJ, Oliveira MS, Matthews CE, et al. Prediction of activity mode with global positioning system and accelerometer data. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(5):972–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnunen H, Häkkinen K, Schumann M, et al. Training-induced changes in daily energy expenditure: methodological evaluation using wrist-worn accelerometer, heart rate monitor, and doubly labeled water technique. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabandere AD, Beéck TOD, Schütte KH, et al. Data fusion of body-worn accelerometers and heart rate to predict VO2max during submaximal running. PLOS One. 2018;13(6):e0199509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland I, Kikhia B, Nugent C, et al. Optimal placement of accelerometers for the detection of everyday activities. Sensors (Basel). 2013;13(7):9183–9200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch BA, Kaufman TK, Rajjo TI, et al. Accuracy of accelerometers for measuring physical activity and levels of sedentary behavior in children: a systematic review. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019;10:2150132719874252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough SJ, Noonan R, Rowlands AV, et al. Wear compliance and activity in children wearing wrist- and hip-mounted accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2016;48(2):245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLellan G, Arthur R, Buchan DS. Wear compliance, sedentary behaviour and activity in free-living children from hip-and wrist-mounted ActiGraph GT3X + accelerometers. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(21):2424–2430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirard JR, Slater ME. Compliance with wearing physical activity accelerometers in high school students. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6(s1):S148–S155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robertson W, Stewart-Brown S, Wilcock E, et al. Utility of accelerometers to measure physical activity in children attending an obesity treatment intervention. J Obes. 2011;2011:e398918–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crouter SE, Bassett DR. A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(3):217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Welk GJ, Nam YH, et al. Comparison of consumer and research monitors under semistructured settings. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(1):151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Hibbing P, Mantis C, et al. Comparative evaluation of heart rate-based monitors: Apple Watch vs Fitbit Charge HR. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(15):1734–1741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury EA, Western MJ, Nightingale TE, et al. Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, et al. Fitbit®: an accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:138–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusmer RJ, Bosch TA, Watkins AN, et al. Comparison of FitBit® Ultra to ActiGraphTM GT1M for assessment of physical activity in young adults during treadmill walking. TOSMJ. 2014;8(1):11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall B, Bellovary B, Gothe NP. Validity of wearable activity monitors for tracking steps and estimating energy expenditure during a graded maximal treadmill test. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(1):42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-M, Kim Y, Welk GJ. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1840–1848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Nuss K, Thomson EA, et al. Validation of overall energy expenditure measurements in the Fitbit Charge HR 2 and Apple Watch. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2018;50(5S):661.
   Google Scholar
• Nuss KJ, Thomson EA, Courtney JB, et al. Assessment of accuracy of overall energy expenditure measurements for the Fitbit Charge HR 2 and Apple Watch. Am J Health Behav. 2019;43(3):498–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieverdes J, Wickel E, Hand Bergamin Moran, Blair S. Reliability and validity of the Mywellness Key physical activity monitor. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahl Y, Düking P, Droszez A, et al. Criterion-validity of commercially available physical activity tracker to estimate step count, covered distance and energy expenditure during sports conditions. Front Physiol. 2017;8:725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen MP, Gomersall SR, Keating SE, et al. Accuracy of heart rate watches: implications for weight management. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Godin SD, Owens MV. Measuring the validity and reliability of the Apple Watch as a physical activity monitor. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019;59(5):784–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoye AHK, Mitrzyk JR, Molesky MJ. Comparative accuracy of a wrist-worn activity tracker and a smart shirt for physical activity assessment. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2017;21(4):201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker WJ, Bhammar DM, Sawyer BJ, et al. Validity and reliability of Nike + Fuelband for estimating physical activity energy expenditure. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015;7(1):14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar