References
- Cicione A, Autorino R, Laguna MP, et al. Three-dimensional technology facilitates surgical performance of novice laparoscopy surgeons: a quantitative assessment on a porcine kidney model. Urology. 2015;85(6):1252–1256.
- Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, et al. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1454–1460.
- Cheng J, Gao J, Shuai X, et al. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(43):70979–70990.
- Fergo C, Burcharth J, Pommergaard H-C, et al. Three-dimensional laparoscopy vs 2-dimensional laparoscopy with high-definition technology for abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2017;213(1):159–170.
- Komaei I, Navarra G, Curro G. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(8):790–794.
- Li C, Aivar M, Kit D, et al. Memory and visual search in naturalistic 2D and 3D environments. J Vis. 2016;16(8):9.
- Tien G, Zheng B, Atkins MS. Quantifying surgeons’ vigilance during laparoscopic operations using eyegaze tracking. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:658–662.
- Chetwood ASA, Kwok K-W, Sun L-W, et al. Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2003–2009.
- Zhang J-Y, Liu S-L, Feng Q-M, et al. Correlative evaluation of mental and physical workload of laparoscopic surgeons based on surface electromyography and eye-tracking signals. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11095.
- Eivazi S, Bednarik R, Leinonen V, et al. Embedding an eye tracker into a surgical microscope: requirements, design, and implementation. IEEE Sensors J. 2016;16(7):2070–2078.
- Heo H, Lee WO, Shin KY, et al. Quantitative measurement of eyestrain on 3D stereoscopic display considering the eye foveation model and edge information. Sensors. 2014;14(5):8577–8604.
- Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, et al. Methodological infrastructure in surgical ergonomics: a review of tasks, models, and measurement systems. Surg Innov. 2007;14(3):153–167.
- Granholm E, Steinhauer SR. Pupillometric measures of cognitive and emotional processes. Int J Psychophysiol. 2004;52(1):1–6.
- Erol Barkana D, Acik A, Duru DG, et al. Improvement of design of a surgical interface using an eye tracking device. Theor Biol Med Model. 2014;11(1):S4.
- Smink DS, Peyre SE, Soybel DI, et al. Utilization of a cognitive task analysis for laparoscopic appendectomy to identify differentiated intraoperative teaching objectives. Am J Surg. 2012;203(4):540–545.
- Anschuetz L, Niederhauser L, Wimmer W, et al. Comparison of 3-vs 2-dimensional endoscopy using eye tracking and assessment of cognitive load among surgeons performing endoscopic ear surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(9):838–845.
- Helbren E, Halligan S, Phillips P, et al. Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: a study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1037):20130614.
- Cowen L, Ball LJS, Delin J. An eye movement analysis of web page usability. London: Springer; 2001.
- Goldberg JH, Kotval XP. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;24(6):631–645.
- Goldberg JH, Stimson MJ, Lewenstein M, et al. Eye tracking in web search tasks:design implications. Paper presented at the Eye Tracking Research & Application Symposium, ETRA 2002; 2002 March 25–27; New Orleans, LA.