1,633
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Volumetric assessment of lower limb oedema using 3D laser scanning technique: a systematic review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 40-45 | Received 24 Jun 2021, Accepted 17 Aug 2021, Published online: 14 Oct 2021

References

  • Kerchner K, Fleischer A, Yosipovitch G. Lower extremity lymphedema update: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment guidelines. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(2):324–331.
  • Szuba A, Rockson SG. Lymphedema: classification, diagnosis and therapy. Vasc Med. 1998;3(2):145–156.
  • Do JH, Choi KH, Ahn JS, et al. Effects of a complex rehabilitation program on edema status, physical function, and quality of life in lower-limb lymphedema after gynecological cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147(2):450–455.
  • Pellecchia GL. Figure-of-eight method of measuring hand size: reliability and concurrent validity. J Hand Ther. 2003;16(4):300–304.
  • Thulesius O, Norgren L, Gjöres JE. Foot-volumetry, a new method for objective assessment of edema and venous function. Vasa. 1973;2(4):325–329.
  • Miller LK, Jerosch-Herold C, Shepstone L. Clinical assessment of hand oedema: a systematic review. Hand Ther. 2017;22(4):153–164.
  • Tierney S, Aslam M, Rennie K, et al. Infrared optoelectronic volumetry, the ideal way to measure limb volume. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;12(4):412–417.
  • Engelberger RP, Blazek C, Amsler F, et al. Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):138.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–341.
  • Mestre S, Veye F, Perez-Martin A, et al. Validation of lower limb segmental volumetry with hand-held, self-positioning three-dimensional laser scanner against water displacement. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2(1):39–45.
  • Hayn D, Fruhwald F, Riedel A, et al. Leg edema quantification for heart failure patients via 3D imaging. Sensors. 2013;13(8):10584–10598.
  • Cau N, Corna S, Aspesi V, et al. Circumferential versus hand-held laser scanner method for the evaluation of lower limb volumes in normal-weight and obese subjects. J Nov Physiother. 2016;6(4):2.
  • Hirai M, Iwata H, Niimi K, et al. Improvement of a three-dimensional measurement system for the evaluation of foot edema. Skin Res Technol. 2012;18(1):120–124.
  • Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
  • Zeraatkar M, Khalili K. A fast and low-cost human body 3D scanner using 100 cameras. J Imaging. 2020;6(4):21.
  • Rabe E, Stücker M, Ottillinger B. Water displacement leg volumetry in clinical studies – a discussion of error sources. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):5.
  • Kaulesar Sukul DM, den Hoed PT, Johannes EJ, et al. Direct and indirect methods for the quantification of leg volume: comparison between water displacement volumetry, the disk model method and the Frustum Sign Model method, using the correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement. J Biomed Eng. 1993;15(6):477–480.
  • Chromy A, Zalud L, Dobsak P, et al. Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods. Springerplus. 2015;4(1):707.
  • Eisenbeiss C, Welzel J, Eichler W, et al. Influence of body water distribution on skin thickness: measurements using high-frequency ultrasound. Br J Dermatol. 2001;144(5):947–951.
  • Pichonnaz C, Bassin J-P, Lécureux E, et al. Bioimpedance spectroscopy for swelling evaluation following total knee arthroplasty: a validation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):100.
  • Rutkove SBJM. Electrical impedance myography: background, current state, and future directions. Muscle Nerve. 2009;40(6):936–946.