In vitro four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance analysis of the effect of pericardial valve design on aortic flow

References

• Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1034–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(2):505–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Mhagna Z, Perotti S, et al. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113(4):570–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(1):149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108(8):983–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Lucherini F, Romagnoni C, et al. Effect of the valve design on pressure drop, pressure recovery, and spatial positioning of vena contracta. Int J Artif Organs. 2020;43(7):468–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Vismara R, Fiore GB, et al. A comprehensive fluid dynamic and geometric study for an "in-Vitro" comparison of four surgically implanted pericardial stented valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 2015;24(5):596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Vismara R, Fiore GB, et al. Does the type of suture technique affect the fluid-dynamic performance of bioprostheses implanted in small aortic roots? Results from an in vitro study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(3):912–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia D, Pibarot P, Landry C, et al. Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17(7):756–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturla F, Piatti F, Jaworek M, et al. 4D flow MRI hemodynamic benchmarking of surgical bioprosthetic valves. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020; 68:18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia J, Barker AJ, Markl M. The role of imaging of flow patterns by 4D flow MRI in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(2):252–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyverfeldt P, Bissell M, Barker AJ, et al. 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(1):72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Dieringer MA, Greiser A, et al. In vitro assessment of heart valve bioprostheses by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: four-dimensional mapping of flow patterns and orifice area planimetry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(3):736–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese D, Weiss K, Baeßler B, et al. In vitro evaluation of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy in trans-catheter aortic valve prostheses. MAGMA. 2018;31(1):165–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ha H, Kvitting JP, Dyverfeldt P, et al. 4D flow MRI quantification of blood flow patterns, turbulence and pressure drop in normal and stenotic prosthetic heart valves. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;55:118–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Kang J, Adeeb E, et al. Comparison of four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging and particle image velocimetry to quantify velocity and turbulence parameters. Fluids. 2021;6(8):277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvitting JP, Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, et al. In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31(5):1075–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durko AP, Pibarot P, Atluri P, et al. Essential information on surgical heart valve characteristics for optimal valve prosthesis selection: expert consensus document from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS)-the society of thoracic surgeons (STS)-American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) valve labelling task force. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;59(1):54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapat VN, Attia R, Thomas M. Effect of valve design on the stent internal diameter of a bioprosthetic valve: a concept of true internal diameter and its implications for the valve-in-valve procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(2):115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatti F, Sturla F, Bissell MM, et al. 4D flow analysis of BAV-related Fluid-dynamic alterations: evidences of wall shear stress alterations in absence of clinically-relevant aortic anatomical remodeling [original research]. Front Physiol. 2017;8(441):441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaudino M, Piatti F, Lau C, et al. Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(2):455–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia J, Marrufo OR, Rodriguez AO, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadri V, Bloodworth CHt, Madukauwa-David ID, et al. A mechanistic investigation of the EDWARDS INTUITY elite valve's hemodynamic performance. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasca G, Beniamino Fiore G, Redaelli P, et al. Hydrodynamic and geometric behavior of two pericardial prostheses implanted in small aortic roots. Asaio J. 2018;64(1):86–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler D, Obrist D. Three-dimensional flow structures past a bio-prosthetic valve in an in-vitro model of the aortic root. Plos One. 2018;13(3):e0194384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo HL, Dasi LP, Carberry J, et al. Fluid dynamic assessment of three polymeric heart valves using particle image velocimetry. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(6):936–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barannyk O, Oshkai P. The influence of the aortic root geometry on flow characteristics of a prosthetic heart valve. J Biomech Eng. 2015; 137(5):051005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toninato R, Salmon J, Susin FM, et al. Physiological vortices in the sinuses of valsalva: an in vitro approach for bio-prosthetic valves. J Biomech. 2016;49(13):2635–2643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasi LP, Simon HA, Sucosky P, et al. Fluid mechanics of artificial heart valves. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;36(2):225–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vismara R, Fiore GB, Mangini A, et al. A novel approach to the in vitro hydrodynamic study of the aortic valve: mock loop development and test. Asaio J. 2010;56(4):279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piola M, Vismara R, Tasca G, et al. Design of a simple coronary impedance simulator for the in vitro study of the complex coronary hemodynamics. Physiol Meas. 2016;37(12):2274–2285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar