In silico modelling of aortic valve implants – predicting in vitro performance using finite element analysis

References

• Adams HSL, Ashokkumar S, Newcomb A, et al. Contemporary review of severe aortic stenosis. Intern Med J. 2019;49(3):297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manji RA, Menkis AH, Ekser B, et al. The future of bioprosthetic heart valves. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135:150–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osnabrugge RLJ, Mylotte D, Head SJ, et al. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: Disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(11):1002–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daubert MA, Weissman NJ, Hahn RT, et al. Long-term valve performance of TAVR and SAVR: a report from the PARTNER I trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2017;10(1):15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedewald VE, Bonow RO, Borer JS, et al. The editor's roundtable: cardiac valve surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(9):1269–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley SM. Aortic valve insufficiency in the teenager and young adult: the role of prosthetic valve replacement. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2013;4(4):397–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kostyunin AE, Yuzhalin AE, Rezvova MA, et al. Degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valves: Update 2020. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020;9:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;63:e57–e185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotman OM, Kovarovic B, Chiu WC, et al. Novel polymeric valve for transcatheter aortic valve replacement applications: in vitro hemodynamic study. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47(1):113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claiborne TE, Sheriff J, Kuetting M, et al. In vitro evaluation of a novel hemodynamically optimized trileaflet polymeric prosthetic heart valve. J Biomech Eng. 2013;135(2):021021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation, ISO 5840:2021 Part 1: General requirements, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation, ISO 5840:2021 Part 2: Surgically implanted heart valve substitutes, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation, ISO 5840:2021 Part 3: Heart valve substitutes implanted by transcatheter techniques, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani B, Tzamtzis S, Sheridan R, et al. In vitro hydrodynamic assessment of a new transcatheter heart valve concept (the TRISKELE). J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2017;10(2):104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani B, Tzamtzis S, Ghanbari H, et al. Manufacturing and hydrodynamic assessment of a novel aortic valve made of a new nanocomposite polymer. J. Biomech. 2012;45(7):1205–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandail HS, Trivedi SD, Shaikh AC, et al. Impact of annular and supra-annular CoreValve deployment locations on aortic and coronary artery hemodynamics. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2018;86:131–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao W, Li K, Sun W. Fluid-structure interaction study of transcatheter aortic valve dynamics using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2016;7(4):374–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharaie SH, Morsi Y. A novel design of a polymeric aortic valve. Int J Artif Organs. 2015;38(5):259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claiborne TE, Xenos M, Sheriff J, et al. Toward optimization of a novel trileaflet polymeric prosthetic heart valve via device thrombogenicity emulation. Asaio J. 2013;59(3):275–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer HA, Matthews PB, Azadani A, et al. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration⋆⋆⋆. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(2):301–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ge L, Leo HL, Sotiropoulos F, et al. Flow in a mechanical bileaflet heart valve at laminar and near-peak systole flow rates: CFD simulations and experiments. J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):782–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluestein D, Rambod E, Gharib M. Vortex shedding as a mechanism for free emboli formation in mechanical heart valves. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122(2):125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono G, Corvi A, Severi T. Functional analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomech. 2005;38(7):1483–1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Sun W. Simulated thin pericardial bioprosthetic valve leaflet deformation under static pressure-only loading conditions: Implications for percutaneous valves. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(8):2690–2701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Lu J, Sacks MS, et al. Dynamic simulation of bioprosthetic heart valves using a stress resultant shell model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;36(2):262–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrani M, Brubert J, Stasiak J, et al. A computational tool for the microstructure optimization of a polymeric heart valve prosthesis. J. Biomech. Eng. 2016;138(6):061001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smuts AN, Blaine DC, Scheffer C, et al. Application of finite element analysis to the design of tissue leaflets for a percutaneous aortic valve. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011;4(1):85–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Sun W. Simulated transcatheter aortic valve deformation: a parametric study on the impact of leaflet geometry on valve peak stress. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2017;33:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burriesci G, Marincola FC, Zervides C. Design of a novel polymeric heart valve. J Med Eng Technol. 2010;34(1):7–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haj-Ali R, Dasi LP, Kim HS, et al. Structural simulations of prosthetic tri-leaflet aortic heart valves. J Biomech. 2008;41(7):1510–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• What do you mean by aortic valve area: Geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or Gorlin area?. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Akins CW, Travis B, Yoganathan AP. Energy loss for evaluating heart valve performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(4):820–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the Management of Valvular Heart Disease. 2017;38:2739–2791.
   Google Scholar
• Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and Central circulatory shunts. I. Am Heart J. 1951;41(1):1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, European Association of Echocardiography, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(1):1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting, ASTM International, ASTM D882-18, Stand. Test Method Tensile Prop. Thin Plast. Sheeting, ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org 2018. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong FL, Goetz WA, Chong CK, et al. Finite element investigation of stentless pericardial aortic valves: Relevance of leaflet geometry. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(5):1908–1918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard, Cardiovascular implants - cardiac valve prostheses. Part 2: Surgically implanted heart valve substitutes, 44 2015. 55p.
   Google Scholar
• Rotman OM, Bianchi M, Ghosh RP, et al. Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(11):771–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luraghi G, Wu W, Gaetano FD, et al. Evaluation of an aortic valve prosthesis: Fluid-structure interaction or structural simulation? J Biomech. 2017;58:45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar