Identifying individual enablers and barriers to the use of digital technology for the self-management of long-term conditions by older adults

References

• Chalfont G, Mateus C, Varey S, et al. Self-Efficacy of older people using technology to Self-Manage COPD, hypertension, heart failure, or dementia at home: an overview of systematic reviews. Gerontologist. 2021;1(6):e318–e334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirakawa K, Umemuro H. Technology acceptance model with social factors for older people. Gerontechnology. 2010;9(2):214–214.
   Google Scholar
• Stellefson M, Chaney B, Barry AE, et al. Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander S. MHealth technologies for the self-management of diabetes in the older population. SIGACCESS Access Comput. 2015;111(111):14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Goodacre K, McCreadie C, Flanagan S, et al. Enabling older people to stay at home: the costs of substituting and supplementing care with assistive technology. Br J Occup Therapy. 2008;71(4):130–140.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(11):e367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens KK, O’Regan N, Rhee JJ. Diabetes management in older adults with chronic kidney disease. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(3):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston HR, Smith ST. Interactive videogame technologies to support independence in the elderly: a narrative Review. Games Health J. 2012;1(2):139–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker L, Moran GM, Roberts LM, et al. The burden of common chronic disease on health-related quality of life in an elderly community-dwelling population in the UK. Family Practice. 2014;31(5):557–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taymoori P, Khazaee-Pool M, Pashaei T, et al. Design and development of a mobile app framework to facilitate breast Cancer-Preventive behaviors (m-BCPB) in the at-Risk women: Qualitative study. PREPRINT (Version 1) Available at Research Square.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming K, Closs SJ, Hughes ND, et al. Using qualitative research to overcome the shortcomings of systematic reviews when designing of a self-management intervention for advanced cancer pain. Int J Qual Methods. 2016;15(1):160940691667065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth A, Carroll C. How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(11):700–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Booth A, Leaviss J, et al. Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the method. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):37–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks L, Eshun-Wilson I, Rohwer A. A mega-aggregation framework synthesis of the barriers and facilitators to linkage, adherence to ART and retention in care among people living with HIV. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud K, Van Biljon J. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study In Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology 2008. New York, NY, USA, 2008, p. 210–219.
   Google Scholar
• Choi HW, DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Kelly M, et al. Older adults and technology use: a systematic literature review. Innovation in Aging. 2020;4(Supplement_1):823–823.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsson E, Nygård L, Kottorp A, et al. Experiences from using eHealth in contact with health care among older adults with cognitive impairment. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019;33(2):380–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers WA, Meyer B, Walker N, et al. Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: a focus group analysis. Hum Factors. 1998;40(1):111–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong DG, Najafi B, Shahinpoor M. Potential applications of smart multifunctional wearable materials to gerontology. Gerontology. 2017;63(3):287–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BY, Lee J. Smart devices for older adults managing chronic disease: a scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(5):e7141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald EM, Perrin BM, Kingsley MI. Enablers and barriers to using two-way information technology in the management of adults with diabetes: a descriptive systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):319–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite M, Martin C, Franklin R, et al. Human factors and data logging processes with the use of advanced technology for adults with type 1 diabetes: systematic integrative review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2018;5(1):e9049.
   Google Scholar
• Shang L, Zhou J, Zuo M. Understanding older adults' intention to share health information on social media: the role of health belief and information processing. INTR. 2020;31(1):100–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis K, Price K. Factors that influence older people's engagement with digital health technology. Nurs Older People. 2017;29(10):27–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahler AM, Rasmussen DM, Andersen PT. Meanings and experiences of assistive technologies in everyday lives of older citizens: a Meta-interpretive review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(8):619–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberti J, Cummings A, Myall M, et al. Work of being an adult patient with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8(9):e023507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucca DC, Hammerschmidt KS, Girondi JB, et al. Game of attitudes: educational gerontotechnology for the elderly undergoing haemodialysis. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(suppl 3):e20180694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dipten C, de Grauw WJ, Wetzels JF, et al. What patients with mild-to-moderate kidney disease know, think, and feel about their disease: an in-depth interview study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(4):570–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linner T, Seeliger A, Vogt L, et al. REACH: Solutions for Technology-Based prevention and empowerment for older people and their caregivers. Population Ageing. 2020;13(2):131–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez VG, Anker-Hansen C, Taylor I, et al. Older People's Attitudes And Perspectives Of Welfare Technology In Norway. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019;12:841–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay EYJ, Massaro S. Planning and shared decision making in elderly care. PsyArXiv: 2018. DOI:10.31234/osf.io/5svtn.
   Google Scholar
• Imbeault H, Langlois F, Bocti C, et al. Can people with Alzheimer's disease improve their day-to-day functioning with a tablet computer? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(5):779–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling CB, Vandenberg AE, Phillips LS, et al. Older patients' perspectives on managing complexity in CKD Self-Management. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(4):635–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G, Nyman E, Fitz-Randolph M, et al. Characteristics, symptom severity, and experiences of patients reporting chronic kidney disease in the PatientsLikeMe online health community: Retrospective and qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e18548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert K, Mansfield K, Mullan J. How do patients and carers make sense of renal dietary advice? A qualitative exploration. J Ren Care. 2018;44(4):238–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stomer UE, Wahl AK, Goransson LG, et al. Exploring health literacy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson J, Tong A, Gutman T, et al. Experiences and perspectives of dietary management among patients on hemodialysis: an interview study. J Ren Nutr. 2018;28(6):411–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald M, Beanlands H, Straus SE, et al. A Web-Based Self-Management support prototype for adults with chronic kidney disease (My kidneys My health): Co-Design and usability testing. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(2):e22220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donald M, Beanlands H, Straus S, et al. Preferences for a self-management e-health tool for patients with chronic kidney disease: results of a patient-oriented consensus workshop. CMAJ Open. 2019;7(4):E713–e20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smekal M, Gil S, Donald M, et al. Content and quality of websites for patients with chronic kidney disease: an environmental scan. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019;6:2054358119863091.
   Google Scholar
• Donald M, Beanlands H, Straus S, et al. Identifying needs for self-management interventions for adults with CKD and their caregivers: a qualitative study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(4):474–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lariviere M, Poland F, Woolham J, et al. Placing assistive technology and telecare in everyday practices of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from an embedded ethnography of a national dementia trial. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crete-Nishihata M, Baecker RM, Massimi M, et al. Reconstructing the past: personal memory technologies are not just personal and not just for memory. Human–Computer Interaction. 2012;27(1-2):92–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters MM, Harbers M, Neerincx MA. Designing a personal music assistant that enhances the social, cognitive, and affective experiences of people with dementia. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;63:727–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamykina L, Heitkemper EM, Smaldone AM, et al. Personal discovery in diabetes self-management: discovering cause and effect using self-monitoring data. J Biomed Inform. 2017;76:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazian S, Crnosija N, Weinger K, et al. The self-management experience of patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2016;12(1):18–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iqbal S, Pipon-Young L. Methods-The delphi method–a guide from susanne iqbal and laura Pipon-Young. Psychologist. 2009;22(7):598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna HP. The delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994;19(6):1221–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney S, McKenna H, Hasson F. The delphi technique in nursing and health research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Synowiez BB, Synowiez PM. Delphi forecasting as a planning tool. Nurs Manage. 1990;21(4):18–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London, UK: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Astell A, Smith S, Joddrell P, editors. Using technology in dementia care: a guide to technology solutions for everyday living. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt CW. Technology and diabetes self-management: an integrative review. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(2):225–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood E, Ward G, Woolham J. The development of safer walking technology: a review. Journal of Assistive Technologies. 2015;9(2):100–115.
   Google Scholar