Meaningful involvement of children and young people in health technology development

References

• UNICEF. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Powell P, Wheeler G, Redford C, et al. The suitability and acceptability of a co-designed prototype psychoeducational activity book for seven- to eleven-year-olds with ADHD. Design for Health. 2021;5(1):4–25.
   Google Scholar
• Brady L-M, Graham B. Social research with children and young people a practical guide. Bristol: Policy Press Shorts; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fahey RA, Hino A. COVID-19, digital privacy, and the social limits on data-focused public health responses. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;55:102181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De’ R, Pandey N, Pal A. Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: a viewpoint on research and practice. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;55:102171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A, Gwilt I, Wallace N, et al. Low-contact co-design: considering more flexible spatiotemporal models for the co-design workshop. Strateg Des Res J. 2021;14(1):124–137.
   Google Scholar
• Blower S, Swallow V, Maturana C, et al. Children and young people’s concerns and needs relating to their use of health technology to self-manage long-term conditions: a scoping review. Arch Dis Child. 2020;105(11):1093–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIHR Oxford BRC: a researchers guide to PPI [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://oxfordbrc.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/A-Researchers-Guide-to-PPI.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NIHR INVOLVE: What is public involvement in research? [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient-focused interventions: a review of the evidence. London: The Health Foundation; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• NIHR INVOLVE: UK standards for Public Involvement in Research: better public involvement for better health and social care research. [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/UK-standards-for-public-involvement-v6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NIHR: Briefing notes for researchers – public involvement in NHS, health and social care research [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09] Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/briefing-notes-for-researchers-public-involvement-in-nhs-health-and-social-care-research/27371.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis L, Wykes T. Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203(5):381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouncefield-Swales A, Harris J, Carter B, et al. Children and young people’s contributions to public involvement and engagement activities in health-related research: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price A, Schroter S, Snow R, et al. Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders E, Stappers P. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008;4(1):5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen J, Robertson T. Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York, Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders E, Stappers P. Convivial toolbox: generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam, BIS Publishers; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. Design methods for developing services; 2015; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/guide/design-methods-developing-services.
   Google Scholar
• Langley J, Wheeler G, Partridge R, et al. Designing with and for older people. In: Woodcock A, Moody L, McDonagh D editors. Design of assistive technology for ageing populations. Cham: Springer; 2020. p 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree B, Erickson ME, Joseph-McCullough J, et al. Finding synergies between indigenous and designerly ways of knowing. Design 4 health. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University; 2020. p. 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Langley J, Ankeny U, Partridge R, et al. Co-designing resources for knowledge based self-reflection for people living with Parkinson’s disease to better enable independent living. IADE/UNIDCOM’s 10th International Conference Sense & Sensibility. 2019. Lost in (G)localization. Lisbon; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• NESTA. By Us, For Us: the power of co-design and co-delivery [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/by-us-for-us-the-power-of-co-design-and-co-delivery/.
   Google Scholar
• Bradwell P, Marr S. Making the most of collaboration: an international survey of public service co-design. London: Demos in Association with PwC’s Public Sector Research Centre; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bate P, Robert G. Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: the concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Donetto S, Pierri P, Tsianakas V, et al. Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: realizing participatory design in the public sector. Design J. 2015;18(2):227–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert G, Cornwell J, Locock L, et al. Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services. BMJ. 2015;350:g7714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Point of Care Foundation: EBCD: experience-based co-design toolkit [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://www.pointofcarefoundation.org.uk/resource/experience-based-co-design-ebcd-toolkit/.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen S, Dearden P, Wright D, et al. Participatory healthcare service design and innovation. In: proceedings of the participatory design conference. New York, NY: ACM Press; 2010. p. 155–158.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen S, McSeveny KM, Lockley E, et al. How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. CoDesign. 2013;9(4):230–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert G, MacDonald AS. Infrastructuring for organisational creativity and quality improvement in the healthcare sector: ‘designerly’ or ‘design-like? In: Sangiorgi D, Prendiville A, editors. Designing for service: contemporary issues and novel spaces. London: Bloomsbury; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Versus Arthritis: State of Musculoskeletal Health [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://www.versusarthritis.org/media/14594/state-of-musculoskeletal-health-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• JIA at NRAS: Sobi support #WearPurpleforJIA. [Internet]; [cited 2021 Nov 09]. Available from: https://jia.org.uk/2018/06/08/sobi-support-wearpurpleforjia/.
   Google Scholar
• Ankeny U. Using a co-design approach to develop technological interventions to help children with Arthritis to be more active and independent In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design4Health, Amsterdam; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Plazzi G, Clawges HM, Owens JA. Clinical characteristics and burden of illness in pediatric patients with narcolepsy. Pediatr Neurol. 2018;85:21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler G, Elphick H, Langley J, et al. Co-designing a neck stabilising aid for children with narcolepsy In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design4Health. Lab 4 Living, Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci. 2011;6(1):1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Showalter CD, Kerrey B, Spellman-Kennebeck S, et al. Gastrostomy tube replacement in a pediatric ED: frequency of complications and impact of confirmatory imaging. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(8):1501–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley J, Wheeler G, Mills N, et al. Starworks: politics, power and expertise in co-producing a research, patient, practice and industry partnership for child prosthetics. In Christer K, Craig C, & Chamberlain P, editors. Design 4 Health. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University; 2020. p. 314–322.
   Google Scholar
• Sproson L, Mills N, Pryde L. PPIE Methodology and Adaptations due to Covid-19. 2022. [submitted].
   Google Scholar